View Single Post
Old 05-25-2006, 08:59 AM   #8 (permalink)
MMDad (Premo)
Deranged
 
MMDad's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsbob
Because it would probably be cheaper to build a second two lane span next to the one that is there, instead of building a four lane span upriver somewhere.. and when you suggest upriver, where exactly.. I thought they picked the spot that it is due to water depth, and the length of the span is much shorter there then it would be anywhere else.

Although, if they do build a second span OR a new four lane, I hope they think to build in break down lanes.
The current location is the deepest river in the U.S., so depth isn't the issue.

If you look at where the traffic is coming from and going to, the current location makes the most sense. I guess you could put a bridge in from Broome's Island to Sotterly, but you'd also have to build up the approach roads to handle the traffic.

If we just had two more lanes, a breakdown lane wouldn't be necessary as long as you have lane control like the Bay bridge does.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Biden
"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy ... I mean, that's a storybook, man."

"a one-term, a guy who has served for four years in the Senate. ... I don't recall hearing a word from Barack about a plan or a tactic."
MMDad is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]