| Reply to julius
Julius...
(1) Would you try to sort out your arguments a little more clearly?
Where did you pull the triple cost from???thin air I assume.
Your statements are convoluted and confusing.
(1A) answer: If my statements are like tortuous windings to you or curves that you can't handle, which in turn causes confusion in the brain ... see a specialist Some people are naturely easy to befuddle. My apologies!!!
(2) (If) we were to cork the illegal immigration, restrain the legal immigration, our national growth rate would likely be less than 2% and actually slowing.
We have enough plotted land and potential lots already for the next generation without having to take more.
(2A) answer: Remember my friend, your family goes back to immigrants. This is another reason I refer to the use of COMMON SENSE before puting mouth in gear.
(3) (We are losing) over 2 square miles of valuable farmland every day to growth in this country.
(3A) answer: Once again, your above sentence is stated with negative thinking. Let me explain why I know you are a pessimistic person. I will print your above statement in a different way, but with the same meaning.
(Growth in this country is using 2 acres a day of our farmland).
This is not just in this country, it's world wide. There is no way to stop this growth unless you close all the borders and all foreign trade. One can not be done without doing the other. Meaning your solution is for the Untied States to be come isolated from the rest of the world. Think again ... and this time give it some thought before speaking.
(4) And with the world growing more hostile toward us,...we better preserve that which should feed us tomorrow.
(4A) answer: At present there are a lot of hostilies against us, but preservation of land isn't going to help that. Not allowing immigrants will cause more harm. Security world wide (including at home) must be in place for the best protection possible.
(5) Lets begin right here in Calvert county: keep this a green county.
(5A) answer: This is not a logical statement, thereby not deserving an answer. |