Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JPC sr  All this stuff about getting the Courts and the Judge to decide what school the kids will go to is exactly what "parenting police" and "big daddy gov" is talking about.
The choice of schools is a parenting decision and it is a wrong question for a Court of law. If one parent will not cooperate then that is normal life. It has to be worked out by the parents and giving the problem of which school over to the Courts is letting the big daddy gov do the deciding as the parenting police.
The entire concept of having the Courts to make parenting decisions is big time wrong and disfunctional.
Shall then we allow the Courts to decide if the children might watch violent progaming? or not? or have the Courts decide what shall be the children's bedtime?
We need to let the parents take care of their own parenting business and not the gov.  |
Still haven't passed that reading comprehension course, have you? No one is saying the courts will decide anything for the children's school. They're talking about dividing up the costs if the parents aren't already in agreement. Most of us don't think the custodial parent should just give up and leave it all up to the non-custodial to decide what should be provided, we use the millenium old court system to provide an objective "judge" (wonder where they got that word from) to decide that fair distribution of costs. Reader's Digest: Courts don't decide, parents do. Courts help when they can't decide together so a disloyal, dishonorable parent cannot saddle the other with all costs.