JPC, you've said you don't like it when I PM you, you want all people to be able to get the wisdom of your words. So, instead of responding to you in PM, I'll post here what my answer is to your last:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JPC sr Quote: |
Originally Posted by This_person Again, it's neither beliegerance nor badgering. I'm holding you to your statements. You say something is codependancy, back it up! Or, correct yourself. You imply people are asking the courts to decide their children's school status, I'm correcting your inaccuracy on this. Back up your statements, or stop making wrong ones. That's not beligerance nor badgering. If you can't stand having your words held up to scrutiny, stop talking. |  I stand by my comments and all my post.
If you have some thing to say then say it but I already said my piece.
Other posters were going 4 pages but you put your beligerant personal affronts and the thread comes to a stop.
It does not make you right, it makes so you shut out other posters and you stop any real communications from continuing.
I am asking that we keep our postings on a mature adult level and stop the personal attacks.
I stand by all that I wrote and I do not need any "back up" as you keep demanding. If you have some "back up" then you post it but quit badgering the dead questions as other people are trying to discuss the issue respectfully.  |
You do NOT stand by your posts, as you will not answer scrutiny to your statements. I am not badgering you, I am asking:
Why is it punishment, as you stated, to provide for your child? You've not answered that though you stated it.
What is the pathological condition you state that custodial parents who feel ill will towards their non-supporting co-parents have? You stated that they have it, explain what it is.
Why do you think your posts are accurate when people who have actual experiences and knowledge of which they speak disagree with you?
Why are you talking about courts deciding where children go to school when the discussion revolves around deciding how that question would be paid for, not whether it should happen?
These are just the most recent questions you refuse to answer as "badgering" and "beligerant". They are neither, they are actual questions relating to your statements.
Again, if you can't handle the heat of having your statements discussed, don't make inaccurate statements.