Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JPC sr  I never said it does. You are just taking us back to twisting again. I choose my words carefully.
I said that custody make a determination as to who provides for the child. If the parents get married and stay married then they both have custody. When the child(ren) are taken by one parent then they take the custody to provide onto themselves. |
Okay, read carefully. I'll type slowly so you can get the full effect of the quesiton
What is the reason that the parent living with the child is the only one responsible for that child's well being? Why doesn't the parent NOT living with the child bear legal, moral, ethical responsibility for the child? I know you've said you like them to, blah blah blah. You've said it is not the moral obligation of the separated parent, and here you're again saying basically the same thing. Why is it not that parent's obligation, responsibility, etc., to provide for that child? Why should the parent with physical placement have all of that placed on them? Regardless of marital status?