Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Midnightrider Nope, they sure are'nt. the members i am talking about just see you tilting at windmills that only you see.
Becky, the problem as i see it is everyone there is trying to rape us, the members, wether its the ones favoring a M&O fee increase or you trying to triple tax people. There is no reason that a person who holds a rental property should have to pay full fees and then the rents also have to pay again- its just rediculous.
As for multiple lot owners having to pay multiple M&O fees i dont get that either. MAYBE if you drop the tenent fees and only charged additional M&O fees to actual landlords, but what about the people who own two or three connected lots of which only one is developed? Why should they have to pay additional fees to use the facilities, or am i mistaking what this fee is for? |
If it's a triple lot and it could be deeded as one... then the owner would only have to pay one fee... one road fee... one Special Tax District....
If the owner chooses to pay the tenat fee that's on them....
I am not the one charging the tenant fee.... I am the one that wants the Landlord to pay an M&O on each house.... that's a horse of a different color
If you only have one rental... you pay one M&O.... it's the guy that owns 30 rentals that I want to pay 29 more M&O's get my drift... he pays the same as you the way it is now...