Quote:
Originally Posted by Giantone  PsyOps,I accept that but that does'nt have a thing to do with the fact Bush made up reasons to go to war.He lied,he was told there were no more weapons of MD and he ignored it. |
You accept what? That Saddam is the one that lied and misled us into believing he was still armed? No you don’t, otherwise you wouldn’t be calling Bush the liar.
The IAEA said there were no WMD were the inspectors; yet they were still demanding to go in for more inspections. Why would they feel a need to do this if there were none there? I’ll tell you why… No one believed them. Why? Because Saddam was still making himself look like he was armed.
The UNSC didn't still felt it was necessary to unanimously ratify UNR 1441. Who manipulated the facts to deceive the UNSC? Who deceived Congress when they had the same intel Bush had? Are you going to tell me Bush single-handedly duped everyone? There were some in the international intel community telling Bush Saddam was still armed and there were some that didn’t believe he was. Bush had to chose who to believe. Given world events he had to err on the side of caution. It turns out he was wrong. Not lied; WRONG! There’s a difference.