Quote:
Originally Posted by Dixie  Curiosity, but if the Washington Post is quoting what they were told by an Army representative how is it a lie conceived by the Washington Post? |
You don't find it interesting that a story about 3 US soldiers killed in a rocket attack segues into an unrelated story about an alleged and disputed US attack on innocent civilians?
And do you feel US newspapers have an obligation to report every bit of silly propaganda from our enemies, which is obviously designed to fuel anti-American and anti-military sentiments? At some point, don't you think there should be proof or at least corroboration before a story goes to print? Or should the WashPost just fill their paper with speculation and allegation?