| If they have so much evidence against this guy or any of the the rest, then they would have been convicted in a court of law 6 years ago instead of siting in limbo while the government tries to invent new rules where they dont have to present any evidence. When you have clear and convincing evidence, you go to trial and get it over with. When you have nothing, you screw around for as long as possible trying to dig something up. 6 years is well into screwing around.
Half the governments own lawyers have quit because they think the whole thing is a load of bs. If they wanted to convice anyone who is not an idiot that these people are guilty, then they should have went to trial years ago and presented the evidence. These days they just look like a bunch of incompetants trying to cover up their mistakes. |