[This_person]

Originally Posted by puggymom

I am currently suffering from mastitis. It is a clogged milk duct caused by a LIVING bacterial infection. It is VERY common in breastfeeding woman. Should I not be allowed to take the necessary antibiotics to make me feel better because after all using your logic I made the choice to breastfeed knowing mastitis could happen.

And on that note seeing as how this bacteria is a LIVING organism in my body what give me the right to decided I can rid myself of it purely for my convience?

Wow, are you really comparing the life of a bacteria to that of your child? Are you serious?

My point is who gets to decide the value of life for others? Does a vegan get to decide that you (general) should not be allowed to eat meat, hunt, or wear any animal products? Because to them animals are living beings that deserve life. How would you feel if they got to make the laws.

Again, corn is just as alive as the cow that I hope eats it before I have the steak from the cow. But, none of these things are humans. I really, really, really see a difference between corn, cows, and humans. I hope you do, too.

Who gets to decide? Society. After all, that's who makes the laws. And, we've decided murder is against the law. Again, if you kill a pregnant woman, you can be charged with TWO murders. So, why isn't it just as much murder to kill the child in a doctor's office?

I firmly believe that abortion should be safe, legal, and rare. Instead of putting all this effort into attacking the supply for abortion why don't we focus on the demand? Why are woman getting pregnant with babies they do not want? Are we not effectly teaching BC to our children?

Because they know they can just kill it legally if they get pregnant accidentally? As shown above, information provided from pro-abortion sources show about 98% of abortions are unneeded for any other reason than convienience of the parent(s). That makes as much sense as being allowed to kill a one year old because the parent(s) didn't realize how much work and money they'd cost.

And honestly what do you think will happen if RvW is overturned? All it does is protect abortion on a federal level. If overturned it is up to the states to make that decision. And blue states, like Maryland, will contine to provide access while red states will ban it then turn around and cut all funding to help the mom and baby out once the baby is born.

That's quite a crystal ball you have. But, that's an interesting thought - the local government would have the control the tenth amendment says they have. Interesting thought.