Quote:
Originally Posted by This_person  Wow, are you really comparing the life of a bacteria to that of your child? Are you serious?Again, corn is just as alive as the cow that I hope eats it before I have the steak from the cow. But, none of these things are humans. I really, really, really see a difference between corn, cows, and humans. I hope you do, too.
Who gets to decide? Society. After all, that's who makes the laws. And, we've decided murder is against the law. Again, if you kill a pregnant woman, you can be charged with TWO murders. So, why isn't it just as much murder to kill the child in a doctor's office?Because they know they can just kill it legally if they get pregnant accidentally? As shown above, information provided from pro-abortion sources show about 98% of abortions are unneeded for any other reason than convienience of the parent(s). That makes as much sense as being allowed to kill a one year old because the parent(s) didn't realize how much work and money they'd cost.That's quite a crystal ball you have. But, that's an interesting thought - the local government would have the control the tenth amendment says they have. Interesting thought. |
EEERRRRRRR!!!!!!! I do not know how to separate the quote thingys without messing up so bare with me.
Me personally, NO!!!! I love my children. BUT YES there are people out there who view a fetus as a alien parasite that is invading thier bodies.
As for the killing the pregnant woman and being charged with two muders or even just killing her fetus well again I am PRO CHOICE. By doing that you are taking her choice away.
Once a baby is born it hs legal rights. Before that it does not as two people cannot have the same legal rights over one body.
And my point is abortion still would be accessable if RvW was overturned. Heck conservative South Dakota voted down an abortion law because it failed to include the life of the mother.