Quote:
Originally Posted by wildsage  That is the whole point: scientific theories ARE testable or they wouldn't be theories. Theory doesn't mean "hunch" nor does it mean "a story I believe in" nor "an idea that I hope is true in the absence of anything tangible." |
So, again, show me the test for human and plant and insect "evolution" from a single life source.
What, there isn't one? Well, then certainly there's been a test that shows offspring species that are more advanced than the parent species, right?
What, no? Well, I guess evolution is just a "hunch", or "a story you believe in" or "an idea that you hope is true in the absence of anything tangible", since it meets none of your definitions of scientific theory!
Quote:
|
We're back to saying that religious beliefs should be taught in theology classes, especially if they all get equal time; specific religious beliefs belong in the institution that harbors the community of those believers; science is taught in school because the purpose of school is to engender knowledge.
|
Or, scientific myth/fantasy, in this case.