Southern Maryland Community Forums - View Single Post - 31,000 Scientist Say No To Global Warming

greg_the_great · 05-23-2008, 06:45 AM

Gotta love your theories... I have mine as well

I have not decided on evolution yet. One of the law of science is the law of conservation of energy. From that law alone put the universe in a box of controlled experiment. So maybe there is a "creator".

But regardless, the nuclear waste is easy, space is big, toss it out. As for oil, I see you are up on the talking points of GW, but not finding solutions. Solar and wind will never produce enough energy to continue the world in growth. I personally don't want to go without. I am all for new energy sources, but you offer nothing new. Wind mills were around long before oil. Flat out, does not do it. Reactor do. And they solve your little problem of carbon footprints, which is theory as well. And okay, I will try to be clear... you can possibly say that carbon footprints are real, but it is just theory on if they has anything to do with GW. Also, still waiting for you prove you claim the Gore's movie was accurate.

I just like the solar links. Mainly cause they are showing the activity of the Sun, which is the major cause of cooling and warming of the planet.

Massive oil field<br> found under Gulf
CRYING WOLF: Warnings about oil supply
Oil from a stone - Oct. 31, 2007

And for all the "big oil" statements, all your arguments are from people that will make large amount off of the hopes that we will kill ourselves.

See the real issue is not GW. The issue is profits. I have enough common sense to see through the GW crap. I am all for other sources of energy. I do not like spending 65.00 to fill up my mid-size sedan. I also do not fell like wasting money on a hybrid. Every time I do the math, I end up spending more over ten years owning one than not. But you religious GW types offer NOTHING reasonable to replace oil at this time. I have offered something. Reactors that produce hydrogen which in turn produces no footprint from vehicles driven. I cannot put a wind mill on my car or solar panels. You batteries for hybrids will outweigh any nuclear waste by far. And we have facilities in the US to dispose of waste.

So, all we have are theories that cannot be proved. We can believe they are true, but that does not make them so. Offer a reasonable solution that makes sense and the argument stops.

05-23-2008, 06:45 AM	#115 (permalink)
greg_the_great Registered User Member Since: May 2008 Posts: 4	fun Gotta love your theories... I have mine as well I have not decided on evolution yet. One of the law of science is the law of conservation of energy. From that law alone put the universe in a box of controlled experiment. So maybe there is a "creator". But regardless, the nuclear waste is easy, space is big, toss it out. As for oil, I see you are up on the talking points of GW, but not finding solutions. Solar and wind will never produce enough energy to continue the world in growth. I personally don't want to go without. I am all for new energy sources, but you offer nothing new. Wind mills were around long before oil. Flat out, does not do it. Reactor do. And they solve your little problem of carbon footprints, which is theory as well. And okay, I will try to be clear... you can possibly say that carbon footprints are real, but it is just theory on if they has anything to do with GW. Also, still waiting for you prove you claim the Gore's movie was accurate. I just like the solar links. Mainly cause they are showing the activity of the Sun, which is the major cause of cooling and warming of the planet. Massive oil field<br> found under Gulf CRYING WOLF: Warnings about oil supply Oil from a stone - Oct. 31, 2007 And for all the "big oil" statements, all your arguments are from people that will make large amount off of the hopes that we will kill ourselves. See the real issue is not GW. The issue is profits. I have enough common sense to see through the GW crap. I am all for other sources of energy. I do not like spending 65.00 to fill up my mid-size sedan. I also do not fell like wasting money on a hybrid. Every time I do the math, I end up spending more over ten years owning one than not. But you religious GW types offer NOTHING reasonable to replace oil at this time. I have offered something. Reactors that produce hydrogen which in turn produces no footprint from vehicles driven. I cannot put a wind mill on my car or solar panels. You batteries for hybrids will outweigh any nuclear waste by far. And we have facilities in the US to dispose of waste. So, all we have are theories that cannot be proved. We can believe they are true, but that does not make them so. Offer a reasonable solution that makes sense and the argument stops.
	[ Reply w/Quote ]