View Single Post
Old 06-02-2008, 06:25 PM   #152 (permalink)
wildsage
earthling
 
wildsage's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: L-town
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by This_person View Post
Um, the 31,000 ALSO disagree, not agree, with global warming....
Ummm, asked & answered. Either you have a real short attention span or you just skipped to the end; you need to go back and start reading this thread from the beginning.
Quote:
Originally Posted by This_person View Post
nuggets of truth in there, yes
Congratulations! Now, see, rational thought doesn't hurt too much does it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by This_person View Post
Biased in having an agenda for their results. Biased in not looking at the bad data provided because they had a predetermined outcome. That kind of biased.
REAL short attention span
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildsage View Post
If you want to satisfy yourself of undisputably unbiased research, I guess you would have to review all of the climate change data from all reliable (peer-reviewed) sources -- not just those from the handful of deniers & obfuscators -- and publish your own conclusion. Please use footnotes.
I'll wait.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK-74me View Post
Don't you know by now? They are all paid off by big oil!!
...and/or big coal or have their credibility compromised otherwise
Singer: big oil AND tobacco
Soon: American Petroleum Institute
Balling: ExxonMobil, the British Coal Corporation, Cyprus Minerals and OPEC
Lindzen: ExxonMobil, Western Fuels Alliance, OPEC
Idso & Idso: ExxonMobil
Michaels: IREA
Bailunas: OISM

and many, many more
wildsage is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]