Quote:
Originally Posted by wildsage  Your recent post
contained a link to a list of professionals (not "skeptics") who (at least partially) disagree and it is more legitimate, but still a far cry from 31,000 (or 3,100 or even 310) which was the subject of this thread. |
So, saying they were a percentage of the 31,000 provided what information?
I gave a Wiki list of people skeptical of the hype, who happen to be professionals in the weather field. I also gave a list of "faithful" who lost their faith in the mythology of man-made climate change from the US Senate.
Here's some of the science as to why people who used to believe don't any more. Note, the word "science".
And, a
report on the fact that, if it's even occuring, global warming could not be man-made. And,
another. But, read this
comprehensive look first. Or, this one
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Excerpt New study finds IPCC "consensus" an "illusion"
An analysis released in September 2007 on the IPCC scientific review process by climate data analyst John McLean, revealed that the UN IPCC peer-review process is "an illusion."
The new study found that very few scientists are actively involved in the UN's peer-review process. The report contained devastating revelations to the central IPCC assertion that 'it is very highly likely that greenhouse gas forcing has been the dominant cause of the observed global warming over the last 50 years."
The analysis by McLean states: "The IPCC leads us to believe that this statement is very much supported by the majority of reviewers. The reality is that there is surprisingly little explicit support for this key notion. Among the 23 independent reviewers just 4 explicitly endorsed the chapter with its hypothesis, and one other endorsed only a specific section. Moreover, only 62 of the IPCC's 308 reviewers commented on this chapter at all." |
Here's some of the changes the IPCC had to do to correct their errors.
Sad to see your little world crumble, isn't it?
