View Single Post
Old 06-25-2008, 11:56 AM   #12 (permalink)
foodcritic
Registered User
 
foodcritic's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: St Mary's County
Posts: 1,457
That makes lots of sense

Quote:
Originally Posted by smilin View Post
Unless I'm misreading this wonderful piece of journalism, the statistics the author is quoting have nothing to do with actual yearly graduation rates.
The statistics are: "how many students graduate high school on time in four years. The report uses a formula that looks at attrition rates from one grade level to the next in high school".
The formula is for how many kids were held back a grade, so they could catch up. They then eliminated those kids from the overall rate.
Sort of blows a hole in the theory that the schools are promoting and graduating everybody.
So in essence what your saying is that by keeping kids in skool until there 21(me thinks thats the leagal cutt-off) so that they can have accumulated enough time/credit to graduate is not social promotion. They figured out a way to cover up the obvious. Heck why not keep them in skool till there 25 or 30. I am sure by that time they would have been able to get them graduated. UNBELIEVABLE

foodcritic is online now   [ Reply w/Quote ]