View Single Post
Old 10-10-2008, 12:50 AM   #101 (permalink)
skizzle
Registered User
 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: St. Mary's
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by sinwagon View Post
Its pretty cut and dry, I don't know why you don't understand it. Personally I think you should be held 50% responsible for the care of all of your children as he should be too, not him being 60 percent responsible and you 40 percent simply because you make less money. If a father couldn't pay his support, they would tell him "oh well, get a 2nd job" if you can't provide your 50% of the support then you too should get a second job or share custody so that you both break even.

Personally, unless your child has extra ordinary medical expenses or goes to a private school, I don't see how they see it takes $600 (don't know what you were awarded but for an example I will use $600) to raise a child. Crap, I didn't spend that much a month on BOTH of my kids and my kids had top of the line sh*t.
I completely disagree with you. It takes more than $600 a month to raise a kid, especially while still having daycare costs. My daycare is $365 alone. Then you can include food, electric, rent, vehicle maintenance, phone, dental/medical, clothes, school supplies, and even fun every now and then. Oh and lets not forget the voilin, soccer or any other afterschool activities that costs money.
So the basics to raise a kid go beyond your $600 marker and it keeps going from there. If I was by myself, I wouldn't have the extra bedroom, large space to heat, extra mileage on my vehicle, etc.
And you want to talk about this 50% even share crap. Oh please. If the kid lives with the cust. parent, then that parent is already doing more than the 50% share. It is not just about the money factor, but also who takes more responsibility of the kid. If the non-cust. parent only sees said kid every other weekend, would you still consider that 50%?
You want to talk about a 2nd job? Do you think it's fair for the cust. parent to work 2 jobs while trying to take care of the kiddo? Do you think that really benefits the kid? No, that takes away from the kid, no matter how old. Think again about your statements.
In a perfect world, this would be black and white. Instead, it is grey all over.
skizzle is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]