Quote:
Originally Posted by PsyOps  FoxNews, by far, was deemed the most watched and fair network for campaign coverage. MSNBC (NBC) was clearly in the tank for BO. MSNBC showed themselves to be inaccurate on the routine basis and folks like O'Reilly pointed this out time and time again. Yet BO was elected. They must've been doing something right. Who can explain this crazy phenomenon? |
Change.... It all comes down to that. Politicians promise change all the time, but when Obama said it, not only did he sound sincere (benefits of natural charisma, which dwarfed McCain's charisma, which is one step above an eggplant's), but he is also
a literal physical manifestation of change. And after 8 years of W (who - let's be honest - sucked) people are desperate for real change.
So, if anyone can exact change it's gotta be this guy, who is
literally unlike the previous 43, right?
Personally, I don't expect a lot of change, and based on MANY of the things he's said, the change he will bring about will be geared toward Marxism - which is not something that I look forward to.
I seriously hope he rocks it out as president, I do. But I get a sneaking suspicion that I'm going to be looking anxiously toward 2012.