Quote:
Originally Posted by Beaver-Cleaver  DING DING DING !!! |
Please explain how defining marriage as between one man and one woman is against this amendment in ANY way.
Now, remember, when you do this, the next questions will be:
- So, what about polygamists? Incestuous relationships among consenting adults?
- Since a marriage license merely provides tax status and welfare abilities, would you consider the fact that higher income people paying a higher percentage of their taxes to also violate this amendment?
- How about a women's shelter vs. a hotel - should one be tax exempt and the other not? Wouldn't that also violate this amendment with the same lame argument you'll use for homosexual marriage?
Also keep in mind that California has a civil union status, so all of the other so called advantages of a marriage license are already available for a homosexual union, just under a different name (based on being a different category of union).