[This_person]

Originally Posted by thatguy

i didn't get past the self important 6 in a row that you put on the last page

I hadn't read in a while and responded as I read through

Just like YOU have no right to tell women what to do with their bodies, YOU have no right to limit anyone from getting married.

I neither try to tell women what to do with their bodies nor do I limit anyone from getting married.

I do think it's wrong for women to kill the babies they willingly put in their bodies, and would support legislation that said so.

I do think it's fair, right, and just for the majority to define what a "marriage" is, so long as it is not discriminatory to race, color, creed, etc., and would support legislation that said so.

If you don't like that they are also going to call their commitment a marrige, then you should change what you call yours. Again, a breeding contract would suffice.

Again, you still make no sense. Why would I change thousands of years of tradition for 2% of the population, most of whom ALSO don't care about homosexual "marriage" beyond the concept?