Southern Maryland Community Forums - View Single Post

susanconstant · 11-30-2008, 07:58 PM

This is a suit that has been in and out of SCOTUS and is back within it once again as Marbury was violated in my unique case and as I have been suing since April of 2007 to stop what is happening in our nation. Currently I have a case to be conferenced on December 5th, 2008. It is In Re Susan 08-6622; attached to it as if it has never been heard is the previous case, In Re Susan 07-9804. A third action is also present as I filed an application for a stay as the solicitor genral failed to respond to me within 30 days. Guess what? The response was due November 5th thus this election is invalidated as you may not hold an election if Marbury is overturned. I then mailed the court an actual petition to support my app. for a stay; I do not know if they will docket it separately or attach it ot the case set for conference the 5th. I do know it is deliberately being kept quiet and that the news, other federal court and the Congress actively sought to silence me - and I proved this beyond any doubt to the Supreme Court as I entered a case a federal judge had pulled from the files with the date and time stamp tampered with to avoid anyone from discovering what is in it. This is not abuse of judicial discretion but a crime. It happened more than once. Not one newspaper, news program or internet site will address it as I am a woman and as the contents are so explosive and embarrassing for the unjust men who believe they are in charge of this nation and us when they are not as any law repugnant to the Constitution is void so that any person holding an office acting in violation of the law with deliberation is void too. You do not have to do a damn thing they tell you to d as we are all volunteers and none of us agreed to any of this! Proof Congress voided itself? Why, Resolution 511 as Congress admitted it was nominating unqualified men to the ballot with that resolution, lol. Plus I served all 100 Senators long ago.

Natural birth is the case for women and equal rights. You have men trying to change the terms of our law in order to steal this right from women before it has ever been accorded in order to preserve, protect and defend the instituion as all male and as Congress' personal whipping boy and gofer. I am posting the federal questions and the main body of my suit to inform you. The clerks recieved this on Wednesday; if it is to be filed separately as it may not as In Re Susan addresses all of this too then it will happen early this week. You may not believe what you are about to read but if it was not all hardcore fact then I NEVER would have been granted the standing I was as there is only one other case like my own. That case? The Declaration of Independence as it is an actual petiton that one man wrote and he later approved the changes as they were made.

I have discovered the truth is so emotionally painful for people when they read it that they go into automatic denial as the idea they volunteered to die for 8 years for nothing and never knew the actual reasoning why Bush v gore is not legal hurts. What could be so painful that even John Roberts flinched at first but then came to his senses? Bush V Gore is a tie and so neither Bush nor he were legal and so had no power or authority to do a single thing they did as I fought it from day one due to my unique facts and legal situation and I even refused to pay all taxes as they have been levied unjustly since 2000. As long as one person disobeys as a citizen must according to Marbury and first the law, Bush V Gore never goes away and we can always sue. It goes to: The first volunteer - me! This will take a few posts so be patient. Oh yeah - I used to live in Baltimore, Rosedale to be exact. I moved to FL in 2003 to pursue this as I was first injured in FL in 1996 by the US military and the state and all records were unconstitutionally kept from me. The suit:

No._________________

In The
Supreme Court Of The United States

SUSAN HERBERT

A Natural Born Citizen Who Is A Mother And So Shed Her Blood And Risked Her Life In Defense Of The Constitution Or We, The People
Thus The Protected Right Is Hers

Petitioner,

VS.

BARACK OBAMA

AND

THE UNITED STATES

Respondents.

___________________

Petition For An Extraordinary Writ Of Mandamus And/Or Prohibition
In A Case Of Original Jurisdiction
________________

SUSAN HERBERT
1100 Seagate Avenue 101
Neptune Beach, FL 32266
904-705-6171

Questions

Did the US Supreme Court violate Marbury by refusing to accord In Re Susan Herbert oral argument as it is a case that is pro se, constitutional authority and original jurisdiction thus hearing is then automatically both reading and oral argument, and as her claim is that she was and is denied any appearance in person in any court as a plaintiff or petitioner and so this court only compounded the injury?

Have all offices of government been unchecked as both cases known as In Re Susan Herbert proved as does her life as she is her case? If Marbury is violated and all offices are unchecked, then is a Presidential election legal, binding and valid?

What does the phrase “natural born citizen” mean? Must a citizen be born within the US or does it mean one or both of his or her parents must be natural born American citizens? Does Barack Obama fulfill this requirement? What is must a citizen produce to then prove they are a “natural born citizen” as only that and age 35 is a named requirement to then legally hold this office? Is a registration of birth certificate acceptable or must a person produce an actual birth certificate issued by a state and so not a registration only?

Is Susan Herbert the acting legal President and Commander as proven by her two cases both of which are pro se, constitutional authority and original jurisdiction, was she at the time this election was held and if so was it unconstitutional and a crime for court officers, attorneys and federal judges to conspire alone or in conjunction with others to keep her name off of the Presidential ballot in all states?

Is the office of President and Commander the protected right of mothers and veterans only and a privilege for all others? If so have women who are mothers been illegally kept off of the ballot while men who have no right and have not earned the privilege or even proven their willingness and ability been placed on it? Is this the direct result of discrimination and the past effects of discrimination and unfair, unjust rules meant to protect a two party monopoly and predominantly male, Judeo-Christian system?

Is the drafting of women unconstitutional as it constitutes double jeopardy as women are always subject to death via sex and childbirth while men are not thus women shed blood and risk their lives in defense of the Constitution each time they give birth? Is “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” unconstitutional as it yet denies even women who are gay some combat positions namely Commander in Chief and as it encourages lying from a time before you enter the military?

Is it legal for any member of the current Congress to be on the ballot and/to elected to the office of President as Congress creates legislation, impeaches and declares war, as it is a Congress that refused to impeach and publicly announced it did not have to do its duties so it would not as it was above the law, and who refused accord women justice by creating legislation always citing money as excuse and who declared a war upon bad evidence and did not then address that bad declaration and who later used money in the form of a denial of funding for equipment and troop requests in order to prevent the Commander from discharging his duties and so effectively commanding thus violated the separation of powers and abused the War Powers Act or is this a conflict of interest so great no member of the Congress can ever overcome to then act as President and Commander?

Is a President and Commander in Chief to be held not only to the highest standard, US law, but the strictest standard, actual reality, and does Barack Obama meet these standards? Does he have the ability as “to the best of my ability” is named to fulfill the oath of office as he cannot resolve the injustices women face nor can he resolve any of the issues Bush V Gore then caused? Was he unable from a time before he was even nominated by the Democratic Party due to the unique facts of his life such as being a sitting member of the Congress that did not address a bad declaration of war and his inability to reason Bush v Gore for what it is thus he cannot preserve, protect an defend the Constitution?

Did both major parties engage in the buying and selling of the office of the Executive as evidenced by a reputed $5.3 billion dollar price tag? Did the voters? Does this massive influx of money and the almost total lack of regulation as this money cannot be traced then make it impossible for any person not willing to violate our law or the spirit of our law to then become the elected President and Commander? Does it harm women due to the past effects of discrimination? Did Barack Obama violate the spirit of the law by using only private funding so he could then raise and spend an unlimited amount and so did he purchase this office? Does our law make campaign financing as it exists now unconstitutional as recent reform only served to make it more difficult for independent and third party candidates not less so while actually favoring incumbents and major party candidates?

11-30-2008, 07:58 PM	#1 (permalink)
susanconstant Registered User Member Since: Nov 2008 Posts: 10	SCOTUS suit you may not know about... This is a suit that has been in and out of SCOTUS and is back within it once again as Marbury was violated in my unique case and as I have been suing since April of 2007 to stop what is happening in our nation. Currently I have a case to be conferenced on December 5th, 2008. It is In Re Susan 08-6622; attached to it as if it has never been heard is the previous case, In Re Susan 07-9804. A third action is also present as I filed an application for a stay as the solicitor genral failed to respond to me within 30 days. Guess what? The response was due November 5th thus this election is invalidated as you may not hold an election if Marbury is overturned. I then mailed the court an actual petition to support my app. for a stay; I do not know if they will docket it separately or attach it ot the case set for conference the 5th. I do know it is deliberately being kept quiet and that the news, other federal court and the Congress actively sought to silence me - and I proved this beyond any doubt to the Supreme Court as I entered a case a federal judge had pulled from the files with the date and time stamp tampered with to avoid anyone from discovering what is in it. This is not abuse of judicial discretion but a crime. It happened more than once. Not one newspaper, news program or internet site will address it as I am a woman and as the contents are so explosive and embarrassing for the unjust men who believe they are in charge of this nation and us when they are not as any law repugnant to the Constitution is void so that any person holding an office acting in violation of the law with deliberation is void too. You do not have to do a damn thing they tell you to d as we are all volunteers and none of us agreed to any of this! Proof Congress voided itself? Why, Resolution 511 as Congress admitted it was nominating unqualified men to the ballot with that resolution, lol. Plus I served all 100 Senators long ago. Natural birth is the case for women and equal rights. You have men trying to change the terms of our law in order to steal this right from women before it has ever been accorded in order to preserve, protect and defend the instituion as all male and as Congress' personal whipping boy and gofer. I am posting the federal questions and the main body of my suit to inform you. The clerks recieved this on Wednesday; if it is to be filed separately as it may not as In Re Susan addresses all of this too then it will happen early this week. You may not believe what you are about to read but if it was not all hardcore fact then I NEVER would have been granted the standing I was as there is only one other case like my own. That case? The Declaration of Independence as it is an actual petiton that one man wrote and he later approved the changes as they were made. I have discovered the truth is so emotionally painful for people when they read it that they go into automatic denial as the idea they volunteered to die for 8 years for nothing and never knew the actual reasoning why Bush v gore is not legal hurts. What could be so painful that even John Roberts flinched at first but then came to his senses? Bush V Gore is a tie and so neither Bush nor he were legal and so had no power or authority to do a single thing they did as I fought it from day one due to my unique facts and legal situation and I even refused to pay all taxes as they have been levied unjustly since 2000. As long as one person disobeys as a citizen must according to Marbury and first the law, Bush V Gore never goes away and we can always sue. It goes to: The first volunteer - me! This will take a few posts so be patient. Oh yeah - I used to live in Baltimore, Rosedale to be exact. I moved to FL in 2003 to pursue this as I was first injured in FL in 1996 by the US military and the state and all records were unconstitutionally kept from me. The suit: No._________________ In The Supreme Court Of The United States SUSAN HERBERT A Natural Born Citizen Who Is A Mother And So Shed Her Blood And Risked Her Life In Defense Of The Constitution Or We, The People Thus The Protected Right Is Hers Petitioner, VS. BARACK OBAMA AND THE UNITED STATES Respondents. ___________________ Petition For An Extraordinary Writ Of Mandamus And/Or Prohibition In A Case Of Original Jurisdiction ________________ SUSAN HERBERT 1100 Seagate Avenue 101 Neptune Beach, FL 32266 904-705-6171 Questions Did the US Supreme Court violate Marbury by refusing to accord In Re Susan Herbert oral argument as it is a case that is pro se, constitutional authority and original jurisdiction thus hearing is then automatically both reading and oral argument, and as her claim is that she was and is denied any appearance in person in any court as a plaintiff or petitioner and so this court only compounded the injury? Have all offices of government been unchecked as both cases known as In Re Susan Herbert proved as does her life as she is her case? If Marbury is violated and all offices are unchecked, then is a Presidential election legal, binding and valid? What does the phrase “natural born citizen” mean? Must a citizen be born within the US or does it mean one or both of his or her parents must be natural born American citizens? Does Barack Obama fulfill this requirement? What is must a citizen produce to then prove they are a “natural born citizen” as only that and age 35 is a named requirement to then legally hold this office? Is a registration of birth certificate acceptable or must a person produce an actual birth certificate issued by a state and so not a registration only? Is Susan Herbert the acting legal President and Commander as proven by her two cases both of which are pro se, constitutional authority and original jurisdiction, was she at the time this election was held and if so was it unconstitutional and a crime for court officers, attorneys and federal judges to conspire alone or in conjunction with others to keep her name off of the Presidential ballot in all states? Is the office of President and Commander the protected right of mothers and veterans only and a privilege for all others? If so have women who are mothers been illegally kept off of the ballot while men who have no right and have not earned the privilege or even proven their willingness and ability been placed on it? Is this the direct result of discrimination and the past effects of discrimination and unfair, unjust rules meant to protect a two party monopoly and predominantly male, Judeo-Christian system? Is the drafting of women unconstitutional as it constitutes double jeopardy as women are always subject to death via sex and childbirth while men are not thus women shed blood and risk their lives in defense of the Constitution each time they give birth? Is “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” unconstitutional as it yet denies even women who are gay some combat positions namely Commander in Chief and as it encourages lying from a time before you enter the military? Is it legal for any member of the current Congress to be on the ballot and/to elected to the office of President as Congress creates legislation, impeaches and declares war, as it is a Congress that refused to impeach and publicly announced it did not have to do its duties so it would not as it was above the law, and who refused accord women justice by creating legislation always citing money as excuse and who declared a war upon bad evidence and did not then address that bad declaration and who later used money in the form of a denial of funding for equipment and troop requests in order to prevent the Commander from discharging his duties and so effectively commanding thus violated the separation of powers and abused the War Powers Act or is this a conflict of interest so great no member of the Congress can ever overcome to then act as President and Commander? Is a President and Commander in Chief to be held not only to the highest standard, US law, but the strictest standard, actual reality, and does Barack Obama meet these standards? Does he have the ability as “to the best of my ability” is named to fulfill the oath of office as he cannot resolve the injustices women face nor can he resolve any of the issues Bush V Gore then caused? Was he unable from a time before he was even nominated by the Democratic Party due to the unique facts of his life such as being a sitting member of the Congress that did not address a bad declaration of war and his inability to reason Bush v Gore for what it is thus he cannot preserve, protect an defend the Constitution? Did both major parties engage in the buying and selling of the office of the Executive as evidenced by a reputed $5.3 billion dollar price tag? Did the voters? Does this massive influx of money and the almost total lack of regulation as this money cannot be traced then make it impossible for any person not willing to violate our law or the spirit of our law to then become the elected President and Commander? Does it harm women due to the past effects of discrimination? Did Barack Obama violate the spirit of the law by using only private funding so he could then raise and spend an unlimited amount and so did he purchase this office? Does our law make campaign financing as it exists now unconstitutional as recent reform only served to make it more difficult for independent and third party candidates not less so while actually favoring incumbents and major party candidates?
	[ Reply w/Quote ]