| Index Of Appendices
Appendix A Federal Decision, 2008 Presidential Election
Appendix B In Re Susan Herbert
Appendix C Bush V Gore
Appendix D Doubts Re Obama’s Birth and My Own Birth Certificate
Appendix E $5.3 Billion Estimated Cost Of Election; Private Funding
Appendix F Drafting Women, “Don’t Ask” And “Above My Pay Grade” Remark
Appendix G Is Barack Obama A Professor Of Constitutional Law? Or A Lecturer?
Appendix H Love, Barack: 300 Emails Asking Me For Money And My Vote
(Problem Is, I Have No Vote!)
Appendix I Notice Of Possible New Charges Sent To Rennselaer County, NY
Appendix J Open Duval County Action
Appendix K Mel Martinez: Is This Man For Real Or Is He A Joke?
Appendix L US Case Law Re Citizenship
Appendix M Unique Intellectual Property From In Re Susan
Appendix N Declaration Of Vote: No VP For Me, Only A Possible Secretary Of State Unless A Qualified Citizen Volunteers
Appendix O Pure and Absolute Standing
Upon first petitioning the Supreme Court of the United States I had no idea several thousand others had not hoped and so had faith in the law before me; I had no idea I was first. I may be the only American alive who has actual faith in US law and so will act as others claim they truly believe in the law but the state of our nation proves this false as does my being the first woman 221 years into this nation.
Some of but not all of the constitutional reasoning which invalidates the results of this election, as appearances are deceiving and 'black' is not the issue the voters should be citing. Instead voters should be citing my injury, the discrimination of women, lies made to seem like the truth and illegal actions that are made to seem as if they are legal:
1. A majority, the whole court even, is likely to rule for me thus securing their constitutional authority once again by upholding Marbury on behalf of myself then all women and their children both male and female thus all Americans and petitioner is likely to prevail on the merits as it is math and exact words of our law plus the exact words of prior federal precedent as well as actual biology. My case is supported by proven scientific fact, my own experience of this American life and eyewitness testimony. I am the only person ever to be granted the standing of pro se, authority and original jurisdiction and I have done it twice over. I have chosen to say too much rather than not enough thus proving I can make this case and win on the merits of my case as I overcome all US case law regarding this issue, addressing a person on the ballot for President, so that my cases now before this court as one are adjudicated and so I may orally argue Susan Herbert V Barack Obama and the United States alone or in conjunction with In Re Susan Herbert. The caseload I am now forced to assume all alone would crush any other pro se litigant or any licensed attorney acting alone. It would crush several firms of attorneys working together. Time may run out or the injury may become too severe to then be addressed as irreparable injury, possibly the physical death of my person or my children, may occur. My children have already had their will broken and so their injury is; they have died emotionally and are no longer recognizable. I have already had bones broken and was physically dead once; my injury is now as my death is imminent but not inevitable.
2. This election was never legal as Bush V Gore was not legal and remains a tied decision. No Presidential election and indeed, no election at all, is legal and so valid unless Bush V Gore is addressed. By addressing Bush V Gore and In Re Susan and now Susan V Obama, you then address all others. Bush V Gore is an extreme test of chain of command theory which is how and why it became an illegally waged war; Bush V Gore is the citizens unchecking all offices up to Chief Justice by refusing to obey the law, reason their vote and/or obey the spirit of our law; it is the citizens reasoning and deciding they are powerless victims and so actually becoming powerless victims.
3. Bush V Gore is a Chief Justice unchecking himself, the Justices voting twice for President, 9 as 5?4 as 2 or 5 as 1 versus 4 as 1, a tie, and an illegal third party custody award of my person to lawyers ? men ? not on the ballot. It is also two persons proving they cannot fulfill the oath of office, as they did not act pro se. [A sitting President does decide ties in US Supreme Court; a case of original jurisdiction has no lower or other court ruling plus authority cases by their very nature are challenging the people and the Congress as the inherency or implication is the people and Congress have failed to act or failed to fulfill duty already thus the case enters Supreme Court, so if tied it then goes to the President as a tie then is a case thrown to the people who are embodied by the sitting President as he or she is their one vote realized as executive order. A President and Chief Justice are equivalent legal authorities; a President enforces the law and/or the correct application of it not a lower court. Remember both litigants have entered an honor bond and so it is accepted as fact they voted and so accessed chain of command and secured federal standing thus they are to trust the decision of a sitting President aka their own self and their fellow citizens. A President calls the tie by issuing his or her own reasoned decision as we do not vote on our law as it is; we do not repeal the term known as 4th amendment or the term known as “natural birth” via popular vote. We might fine tune it but we do not ever erase or remove a term! If a President issues an unconstitutional decision? Then Congress can and may act, then a citizen may press another suit or then a citizen may even refuse to obey, as may all citizens. This is WHY you are to reason your vote! I have no idea where, why or how men came to posses the mistaken belief a tie is decided by a lower court. If that has happened? It is incorrect! It was done in error as it then strips a citizen of authority over their own person and robs their vote of legal power.]
4. Bush V Gore became a never legal President then unchecking the office of President as the only legal appointment of a new Chief Justice must be one that is arbitrary like old age in this unique case as the only way to recheck the offices is by arbitrary appointment. Thus all offices of government were then unchecked; no person is in charge and/or all separation of power is grossly violated; not one authority is fulfilling his or her oath of office or discharging their duties and no person knew the actual reasoning to then overturn Bush V Gore when ignorance is not an excuse. Whole schools of law failed. Not one authority I contacted obeyed the law and some even broke it. The citizens violated Marbury first as they obeyed the unconstitutional, unethical and immoral orders of their commanding officers thus they are then liable as proven by their willingness to harm me and my children, to continue to pay taxes levied unjustly (w/o representation) and to suffer the Bush administration; they began volunteering to die in defense of the invention of the institution, office of Chief Justice and President who is also Commander, as all male and in defense of what Congress is and does not the people and in defense of federal court rulings or paper. As a government and law they became dead institutions. The election of 2004 was no good as Bush should not have been on the ballot and Kerry was and is unfit to command as he violated a renegotiated honor bound contract. I had no choice in 2000 as my vote was denied me so had no liberty and my right to vote thus liberty was denied me yet again in 2004. It is still denied me.
5. The declaration of war is no good as it is based upon bad evidence. Congress declares war therefore Congress is to address this declaration by issuing a new one based upon good evidence, invalidating the bad one and not re?issuing it and/or presenting new evidence to then support the bad one thus making it good. Congress did no such thing thus our Constitution was violated in an absolute fashion. May a Congress declare a war upon bad evidence and then act as the Commander? Or abuse the power to fund legislation and/or refuse to create effective legislation for women and yet Preside? Congress is doing both. This is not a Republican form of government and it constitutes unchecked domestic violence. Congress is violating Art. 4 Sec. 4 by living it out as Art. $ Sec. $ |