| 6. Congress then used money to prevent the person the voters believed to be the legal Commander when he is not from discharging his duties and from waging 'effective' war. Congress abused the War Powers Act thus enlisted service member's lives were traded upon the dollar. Enlisted service members are the innocent children of women who are mothers; they are all volunteer and the military is controlled by the civilians ? us. We even have a civilian Commander. Congress is supposed to represent or be WE, the people. It does not and is not; one of the most grievous offenses any office holder can commit is trading the lives of the innocent upon money, especially enlisted service members and mothers. Not one member fulfilled his oath of office thus NO MEMBER OF CONGRESS CAN THEN OVERCOME THE CONFLICT OF INTERESTS TO THEN ACT AS COMMANDER. Obama and McCain equally then were automatically excluded from the ballot as YOU do not get to amend our law in a manner not legal or to elect persons not able to fulfill the Presidential oath of office. The voters are creating a situation that is not only absolutely and wholly unconstitutional but that then denies enlisted service members, mothers and all other women and children their liberty rights and so zero opportunity. No liberty then no justice. Our common interest is to be the law; obviously Congress has reasoned and decided and then forced it upon the voters: Congress no longer obeys the law as it does not have to as there are no consequences. Recently Congress has been printing up or creating energy ? money ? that does not exist and doing so to protect private interests some of who are guilty at my expense. Congress too then is invoking the power reserved to the exactly named Creator as only the Creator can actually create and destroy energy. Congress can try to violate a law known as the “Conservation of Energy and Matter” but it will not work. Congress' interest is that money and the privilege they are accorded via a title. It is perceived power. The voters have given them power that is not theirs by voting them into office over and over even when they admit they have behaved criminally, have refused to discharge their duties and openly stated they will not, and/or do not know the law. The voters violated the separation of powers first.
7. Neither major party candidate has clean hands and neither can actually do anything they have promised to do, as it is humanly impossible for them. For instance, to institute any kind of economic recovery plan? First you must name the exact problem ? the cause ? and all of its effects and then you must know what our dollar actually is and what standard supports it. Neither candidate does. Obama has no clue; he can hope all he wants but nothing he claims will actually happen. Obama has confused what is or is not an entitlement and if these entitlements are even legal. This extends to every area and every problem our nation faces. If a "plan” does seem to make things better? Obama violated the laws that rule this universe; he violated our written law and/or it only seems as if; it is not an actual solution but may be a temporary 'fix'.
8. Unity is not possible unless you can reason and apply the equal protection clauses to women and their children. The promise of Brown will never be realized unless this occurs, as all actual rights are human rights as there is no such thing as women's rights. Money does not resolve this issue. You must define when life begins and so personhood or the right comes into being. A man cannot do this ever, ever, ever as he will not give birth thus he can never own as fact the knowledge. The only way he can do this is by asking a woman for help as in voting for her for President and/or appointing her Chief Justice. Obama has already said it is "above [his] pay grade" to reason this thus he cannot and so will not reason and apply the equal protection clauses to women and their children. It is not legal to subject me to the moral authority of a man who has none, as he will not name it. No man is safe if he refuses to define his views on when life begins and this issue affects women and children only. It is my life and/or the quality of my life that is at stake not his and not any man’s.
9. Only mothers and veterans have a protected right to hold this office; all others have the privilege as only mothers and veterans have proven they can and will shed their blood and risk their life in defense of the Constitution or WE, the people. Obama then claimed for himself a right that he does not possess at the expense of able and capable persons who do have a protected right, some of who are members of a still injured class. McCain? As a veteran he then may be held to a higher standard, as he should possess this knowledge re chain of command theory and illegal war. I am an equal opportunity petitioner as I held both major party candidates equally unable and incapable before the very first primary as no third party could or would win as they lacked the funds to buy the office and as not one third party has secured a place upon all 51 ballots. The Libertarians have been attempting this for over 25 years and have still not accomplished it.
10. Obama claimed he is a constitutional law professor when he is not. An argument began over the fine differences in words. He also snuck into and out of Jacksonville and never stated his reasoning for doing so. This was purposely done as he engineered a situation whereby later in the day he made a splash in Tampa thus the papers did not carry the Jacksonville story as a reporter caught him in the act but only carried his Tampa appearance. This is not an accident or mistake and Floridians are sick of being a doormat for these kinds of antics in regards to Presidential elections. FL was denied justice in 2000 and we were denied justice once again as our delegates to the Democratic Convention thus our vote did not count as the Democrats were censured for holding the primary too early. It matters not if a Democrat then won the national election, as we will never know what might have been as FL delegates could have cast their votes for another Democratic candidate based upon moral authority and the law and because two parties one of which is the Democratic Party have been given control of the ballot. These two parties have overly broad power in violation of the law and prior federal court rulings that state no party may be favored over another; if these two parties were not favored over all others they then would not be the only two on all 51 ballots and they would not appear in the first two slots on all ballots I have seen so far. |