PDA

View Full Version : Tard! This man is a tard!


Larry Gude
11-06-2009, 04:16 PM
Obama says don't jump to conclusions on shooting (http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BQ6FV80&show_article=1)



WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama said Friday the entire nation is grieving for those slain at Fort Hood, and he urged people not to jump to conclusions while law enforcement officers investigate the shootings.
Obama met Friday morning with FBI Director Robert Mueller and other federal leaders to get an update on what they've learned. Thirteen people were killed and 30 others injured in the shooting rampage at the Texas Army post on Thursday. The suspected shooter is an Army psychiatrist; his motive remains unclear.


A few days ago Nancy is saying a huge loss is a big win. Now, Obama is displaying a tenuous grasp of reality. Holy effing hell! He can be a socialist, fine. He can be a race baiter, fine. But, does our president have to be tard???

nachomama
11-06-2009, 04:17 PM
As a member of the tards, I find your accusations insulting and completely uncalled for.

He is NOT worthy of the title of "tard". :drama:

vraiblonde
11-06-2009, 04:21 PM
Okay, so that idiot can say on national television that police acted "stupidly" about a situation he knew absolutely nothing about, but "let's not jump to conclusions" regarding a shooting that we have quite a bit of solid information on?

:loser:

PsyOps
11-06-2009, 04:25 PM
Okay, so that idiot can say on national television that police acted "stupidly" about a situation he knew absolutely nothing about, but "let's not jump to conclusions" regarding a shooting that we have quite a bit of solid information on?

:loser:

Nothing that a beer and some nuts wont resolve.

MMDad
11-06-2009, 05:13 PM
Wirelessly posted (Change we can believe in!: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.7) 320x240; VZW; Motorola-Q9c; Windows Mobile 6.0 Standard)

He's not a tard, he just thinks we are. After all, a majority of us elected him.

I'm sure Alexa will be along shortly to prove him right.

VoteJP
11-06-2009, 05:16 PM
As a member of the tards, I find your accusations insulting and completely uncalled for.

He is NOT worthy of the title of "tard". :drama:
:nomoney: I find the mis-use of that terminology to be upsetting myself.

Why can not people here find some accurate way of cutting others down without this cheap shot against people that do not deserve the reference.




:deadhorse

xusnret
11-06-2009, 05:24 PM
Obama said don't jump to conclusions.. This coming from the man who called the police stupid for arresting his racist buddy gates. I guess its a muslim thing now.

Obama Criticizes Police in Henry Louis Gates Case - ABC News (http://i.abcnews.com/US/story?id=8148986&page=1)

Larry Gude
11-06-2009, 05:26 PM
Wirelessly posted (Change we can believe in!: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.7) 320x240; VZW; Motorola-Q9c; Windows Mobile 6.0 Standard)

He's not a tard, he just thinks we are. After all, a majority of us elected him.

I'm sure Alexa will be along shortly to prove him right.

Nope. I used to be convinced that this man, with his background, his schooling, his rep, was smart and thoughtful. I'm just not seeing it. Sure, he may think everyone else is a moron however, he just isn't that bright.

As Vrai pointed out, the absolute leap he made over the Cambridge cop teaching moment, he knows how to do that, race bait and agitate. His eyes lit up like some dummy doing the NY Times cross word who, finally, found a word he knew.

The shout out yesterday, he knows how to do the seminar, the break out groups, the platitudes.

The campaigning, basking in the accolades and cheers of people who he knows, like a rock star, would all show him their tits if he merely asked.

The speeches, the emoting, the timbre, tone and pacing, I have little doubt his teleprompter tells him when to smile and look left or right.

He doesn't know how to do anything useful and he is oblivious to the deaths and carnage of yesterday because it simply wasn't part of his renowned focus, a focus, as usual, on the image. At the end of the day, actors know how to act, engineers know how to engineer, managers know how to manage and non practicing lawyers know how to sound real, real important. Just like the book tells them.

I'm starting to worry.

Bay_Kat
11-06-2009, 05:30 PM
:nomoney: I find the mis-use of that terminology to be upsetting myself.

Why can not people here find some accurate way of cutting others down without this cheap shot against people that do not deserve the reference.




:deadhorse

JP, he does deserve it and now you go on iggy because I'm sick of you trying to kiss butt to get to the governors mansion which you will never do.

Baja28
11-06-2009, 05:53 PM
:nomoney: I find the mis-use of that terminology to be upsetting myself. Why can not people here find some accurate way of cutting others down without this cheap shot against people that do not deserve the reference. :deadhorseSTFU tard! :smack:

I really hope this dolt (obammy, not JP) has opened the eyes of liberals everywhere. I know there are some democrats on this board who don't post politics or post very little. I hope you guys get it now. I know you're smart enough. :huggy:

PsyOps
11-06-2009, 05:55 PM
I'm starting to worry.

Starting?

navigator
11-06-2009, 06:02 PM
Obama says don't jump to conclusions on shooting (http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BQ6FV80&show_article=1)



A few days ago Nancy is saying a huge loss is a big win. Now, Obama is displaying a tenuous grasp of reality. Holy effing hell! He can be a socialist, fine. He can be a race baiter, fine. But, does our president have to be tard???



Come on, LG. This is an insult to anyone mentality handicapped. B.O. and Nancy Lugosi (who will chew on our necks until we're dry) are just plain EVIL!

PsyOps
11-06-2009, 06:27 PM
Come on, LG. This is an insult to anyone mentality handicapped. B.O. and Nancy Lugosi (who will chew on our necks until we're dry) are just plain EVIL!

I have to agree. I have a cousin who is mentally handicapped and am offended that Larry would put BO anywhere near the caliber of him.

Larry Gude
11-06-2009, 06:37 PM
Come on, LG. This is an insult to anyone mentality handicapped. B.O. and Nancy Lugosi (who will chew on our necks until we're dry) are just plain EVIL!

'Tard' is a forum term created and defined specifically to describe a class of mental problems based on the intentional and voluntary location of ones head in relation to their ass specifically to differentiate and cause no disrespect to folks who have problems through no fault of their own.

:buddies:

Larry Gude
11-06-2009, 06:39 PM
Starting?

I am transitioning from thinking this is just policy arguments he can't help but sound dumb supporting because the policies are dumb to begin with to the opinion that he's not capable because he's not interested in even trying.

PsyOps
11-06-2009, 06:44 PM
'Tard' is a forum term created and defined specifically to describe a class of mental problems based on the intentional and voluntary location of ones head in relation to their ass specifically to differentiate and cause no disrespect to folks who have problems through no fault of their own.

:buddies:

Saved. :buddies:

Larry Gude
11-06-2009, 06:45 PM
Saved. :buddies:

Pretty good, huh? :lol: Kinda like rippin' a decent lead on the first take. :lol:

:larry:

PsyOps
11-06-2009, 06:46 PM
I am transitioning from thinking this is just policy arguments he can't help but sound dumb supporting because the policies are dumb to begin with to the opinion that he's not capable because he's not interested in even trying.

This is what brainwashing does. It seems he was raised to never have his own ideas and think for himself. It's not his fault.

ImnoMensa
11-06-2009, 06:50 PM
Saved. :buddies:

The man is a Muslim , with a desire to protect other Muslims and move forward with his Socialist agenda.
When you realise this Obama will cease to surprise you with his alledged stupidity, and you will know that he is intelligent, but that his agenda and your's clash.


YouTube - Obama Admits He Is A Muslim (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCAffMSWSzY)

Larry Gude
11-06-2009, 06:51 PM
This is what brainwashing does. It seems he was raised to never have his own ideas and think for himself. It's not his fault.

Not brainwashing. I think he got into this a long time ago and enjoyed the whole thing, the dance lessons, the voice lessons, the acting lessons, the composure lessons, just so everyone kept asking him out and saying he was the belle of the ball.

Not brainwashed. He loves him some Barack.

donbarzini
11-06-2009, 07:05 PM
:nomoney: I find the mis-use of that terminology to be upsetting myself.

Why can not people here find some accurate way of cutting others down without this cheap shot against people that do not deserve the reference.




:deadhorse

Shut up moron and let people with an IQ over 75 discuss the issue

PsyOps
11-06-2009, 07:17 PM
Pretty good, huh? :lol: Kinda like rippin' a decent lead on the first take. :lol:

:larry:

Or just rippin' a good one. :geek:

PsyOps
11-06-2009, 07:24 PM
Not brainwashing. I think he got into this a long time ago and enjoyed the whole thing, the dance lessons, the voice lessons, the acting lessons, the composure lessons, just so everyone kept asking him out and saying he was the belle of the ball.

Not brainwashed. He loves him some Barack.

Brainwashing happens in a way that forces you to enjoy it. It becomes you, you become it, and you are happy with that. And you are sheltered from everythning else, so all you know is that thing you are brainwashed with. I happen to believe BO was raised in this kind of environment. He was well trained just for this purpose. Politics.

Larry Gude
11-06-2009, 07:25 PM
Brainwashing happens in a way that forces you to enjoy it. It becomes you, you become it, and you are happy with that. And you are sheltered from everythning else, so all you know is that thing you are brainwashed with. I happen to believe BO was raised in this kind of environment. He was well trained just for this purpose. Politics.

Manchurian Candidate?

Bann
11-06-2009, 07:32 PM
Obama says don't jump to conclusions on shooting (http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BQ6FV80&show_article=1)
A few days ago Nancy is saying a huge loss is a big win. Now, Obama is displaying a tenuous grasp of reality. Holy effing hell! He can be a socialist, fine. He can be a race baiter, fine. But, does our president have to be tard???



Obama's thrown the whole country under the bus.

PsyOps
11-06-2009, 08:13 PM
Obama's thrown the whole country under the bus.

What he doesn't realize is he threw us out the front and he's going in reverse. :lol:

It all comes around next year and in '10. :buddies:

vraiblonde
11-06-2009, 08:21 PM
The Barack Obama I see now is no different than the Barack Obama I saw during the campaign. Seriously, what have we learned about this guy that we didn't already know?

PsyOps
11-06-2009, 08:23 PM
The Barack Obama I see now is no different than the Barack Obama I saw during the campaign. Seriously, what have we learned about this guy that we didn't already know?

Actually I'm surprised he hasn't gone farther than he has. To be honest his lack of leadership abilities has caused him to practically accomplish nothing.

vraiblonde
11-06-2009, 08:38 PM
Actually I'm surprised he hasn't gone farther than he has. To be honest his lack of leadership abilities has caused him to practically accomplish nothing.

He had cult of personality and dark skin - that's it. Then you get all his racist anarchist anti-America pals running around spewing, yet we still wanted to affirmative action that punk into the White House.

So Larry can say Obama's stupid, and he is, but we voted for him. So who're the real stupids??

Larry Gude
11-06-2009, 08:40 PM
The Barack Obama I see now is no different than the Barack Obama I saw during the campaign. Seriously, what have we learned about this guy that we didn't already know?

Oh, I don't know. Sometimes presidents turn out quite a bit different than what may have been thought about them during the campaign(s).

:lol:

vraiblonde
11-06-2009, 08:43 PM
Oh, I don't know. Sometimes presidents turn out quite a bit different than what may have been thought about them during the campaign(s).

When?

Larry Gude
11-06-2009, 08:45 PM
When?

:tap:

Come on.

PsyOps
11-06-2009, 08:45 PM
He had cult of personality and dark skin - that's it. Then you get all his racist anarchist anti-America pals running around spewing, yet we still wanted to affirmative action that punk into the White House.

So Larry can say Obama's stupid, and he is, but we voted for him. So who're the real stupids??

Okay, but tell me you didn't fear he would accomplish more of his socialist purpose than he has.

PsyOps
11-06-2009, 08:48 PM
:tap:

Come on.

Let me guess... It begins with a W

vraiblonde
11-06-2009, 08:49 PM
Okay, but tell me you didn't fear he would accomplish more of his socialist purpose than he has.

Are you kidding? He is less than a year into his term. Still has three years left to go. Plenty of time.

vraiblonde
11-06-2009, 08:50 PM
:tap:

Come on.

What was different about Bush than you thought it would be?

Larry Gude
11-06-2009, 08:52 PM
What was different about Bush than you thought it would be?

You are kidding? My expectations of Bush and Cheney and a GOP congress were...not really met. In fact, quite the opposite, not to mention his closing flourish.

Larry Gude
11-06-2009, 08:54 PM
What was different about Bush than you thought it would be?

Have I not run through my laundry list of complaints enough? I think I made about 3,965 posts, in detail...

Larry Gude
11-06-2009, 08:56 PM
Let me guess... It begins with a W

Educated guess.

PsyOps
11-06-2009, 09:00 PM
Have I not run through my laundry list of complaints enough? I think I made about 3,965 posts, in detail...

Holy Schkamoly, you're keeping count? Creepy!

Larry Gude
11-06-2009, 09:00 PM
Holy Schkamoly, you're keeping count? Creepy!

It was only a guess... :lol:

BadGirl
11-06-2009, 09:07 PM
:nomoney: I find the mis-use of that terminology to be upsetting myself.

Why can not people here find some accurate way of cutting others down without this cheap shot against people that do not deserve the reference.




:deadhorse

Tard....

vraiblonde
11-06-2009, 10:06 PM
You are kidding? My expectations of Bush and Cheney and a GOP congress were...not really met. In fact, quite the opposite, not to mention his closing flourish.

Really? Because I wasn't particularly surprised by their appeasement of the Left. Bush and the whole GOP spent 8 years being ripped to shreds by the media, and they are politicians. What did you think they were going to do?

Besides, you think Bush was the worst most destructive president ever, and I don't agree with that. He had a bunch of shining moments that will go down in history, after the talking heads have all died off. Yes, he had some blunders, but I don't agree that he was such a terrible president. In fact, I miss him dearly right now.

I don't agree that Iraq was a mistake, and I don't think he was any worse at running a war than any other president in history.

I think Colin Powell was an enormous mistake, but everyone else seemed to love him.

I think getting rid of Rumsfeld was a mistake, and I think worrying about what the haters said was a mistake, but again - he's a politician. What did you expect him to do?

Bann
11-06-2009, 10:31 PM
The Barack Obama I see now is no different than the Barack Obama I saw during the campaign. Seriously, what have we learned about this guy that we didn't already know?

Not a damn thing, really! It's true. I know I was here posting things very near every darn day as I found them. Hell, I probably still have the links to a lot of that stuff.

And all the while, the Libbies were railing at me, wringing their hands and gnashing their teeth at my right wing nutcasedness.

So yeah - :neener: WE old y'all Libbies so!!

Bann
11-06-2009, 10:33 PM
I think getting rid of Rumsfeld was a mistake, and I think worrying about what the haters said was a mistake, but again - he's a politician. What did you expect him to do?



:yay: I am still a big Rummy Fan!

Bay_Kat
11-06-2009, 10:34 PM
Not a damn thing, really! It's true. I know I was here posting things very near every darn day as I found them. Hell, I probably still have the links to a lot of that stuff.

And all the while, the Libbies were railing at me, wringing their hands and gnashing their teeth at my right wing nutcasedness.

So yeah - :neener: WE old y'all Libbies so!!

I told my husband from the day I found out Obama was running for president, I don't trust him, he won't do any good for this country, in fact he'll make things worse.

PsyOps
11-06-2009, 10:34 PM
It was only a guess... :lol:

I went back and counted. You were off by 7.

FAIL! :loser:

hvp05
11-06-2009, 10:50 PM
And all the while, the Libbies were railing at me, wringing their hands and gnashing their teeth at my right wing nutcasedness.I posted about this incident on my Facebook page earlier. A few minutes ago one of my friends (an avowed Liberal) sent me an e-mail calling me the insensitive one for "politicizing" this.

This is not about politics at all, as far as I'm concerned; I think everyone ought to be upset at Oblahma's callousness. :shrug:

Larry Gude
11-07-2009, 08:38 AM
Besides, you think Bush was the worst most destructive president ever, and I don't agree with that. He had a bunch of shining moments that will go down in history, after the talking heads have all died off. Yes, he had some blunders, but I don't agree that he was such a terrible president. In fact, I miss him dearly right now.

That's not true, not worst ever. One of them, yes. Worst in our life time? Yes...until Obama replaces him which he is well on his way to achieving.

Your loyalty to Bush is, I suppose admirable, however baseless.

From Schiavo to Fanny/Freddy to expansion of entitlements to oil to conduct of the wars to not having a sitting veep to run in 2008 to bailing out the UAW and TARP, we got two judges and some tax cuts.

So, what shining moments?

You give Bush credit for his intentions, not his results, and that is sooo unlike you.

As for missing Bush, the very idea of him being back in charge gives me a stomach ache and wipes out all the hope I have for the future, hope validated by the recent results in NJ and Va and the huge difficulty Obama is having getting his way.

I'd rather have Obama struggling to shove socialism down our throats and us fighting back rather than Bush doing us like a bunch of sheep hoping and praying he knows best all while our instincts scream out that something is terribly wrong.

You see some well meaning guy with a few shining moments run ragged by the mean old media. I see a crusader who drove this nation over a cliff and handed it to the socialists.

vraiblonde
11-07-2009, 11:30 AM
Your loyalty to Bush is, I suppose admirable, however baseless.

This is where you jumped the shark and I stopped reading.

Just because I don't agree with you that Bush is Hitler and the worst president in our lifetime, evil and inept beyond belief, doesn't mean I'm "loyal" to him. It means I am rational and fair, which is something you are not, in your hyperbolic zeal to jump on the ABB bandwagon.

Larry Gude
11-07-2009, 11:44 AM
This is where you jumped the shark and I stopped reading.

Just because I don't agree with you that Bush is Hitler and the worst president in our lifetime, evil and inept beyond belief, doesn't mean I'm "loyal" to him. It means I am rational and fair, which is something you are not, in your hyperbolic zeal to jump on the ABB bandwagon.

Talk about jumping the shark, time and time again!! You seem totally unwilling to do anything but characterize my criticism of your dear W as nothing short of absolute hatred when that is not even remotely close. And you know it; it's right there in type!

It is pointless to discuss this with you and it has been for a long time because you either REFUSE to read what I actually write or you suddenly lose all your intelligence and reading comprehension skills when you see my name and W's in the same post; THAT is the definition of jumping the shark; just make something up that has nothing to do with the story. THAT is what you do every time I criticize what Bush did and I do it on the issues, on substance, totally devoid of generalizations and name calling.

And you know it.


:tap:

vraiblonde
11-07-2009, 11:45 AM
your dear W

And this is where I stopped reading that post.

MMDad
11-07-2009, 11:47 AM
I find the mis-use of that terminology to be upsetting myself.

Why can not people here find some accurate way of cutting others down without this cheap shot against people that do not deserve the reference.



:roflmao: That's the ultimate! It is a cheap shot to compare tards to someone as effed up as Obama!

godsbutterfly
11-07-2009, 12:06 PM
Bush may not have been the ultimate President but at least he ad his wife are in Ft. Hood trying to offer some condolences instead of giving "shout outs" at a time of tragedy!

Hessian
11-07-2009, 12:25 PM
Americans built memorials to the fallen heroes of their communities. It was noble, honorable.

Will Washington allow us to start putting up memorials across America to the casualties of Muslim violence?...We will need a LOT more in the years ahead due to their inability to recognize the threat within.

Larry Gude
11-07-2009, 12:26 PM
Bush may not have been the ultimate President but at least he ad his wife are in Ft. Hood trying to offer some condolences instead of giving "shout outs" at a time of tragedy!

Contrary to SOME peoples interpretation of plain English, I have always said I think Bush a decent man who simply made BIG well meaning mistakes.

Mistakes, huge ones, mistakes none the less.

And, I have been saying for some time that Obama is well on his way to eclipsing W as the worst president of OUR time. I've also disliked Obama and thought very poorly of him and his character for some time as well. And said so.

:buddies:

Vince
11-07-2009, 12:39 PM
The Barack Obama I see now is no different than the Barack Obama I saw during the campaign. Seriously, what have we learned about this guy that we didn't already know?:yeahthat: He was an azz#### then and he still is an azz####. It just amazes me how many in this country can't see it.

Yet Obama is also scheduled to leave on a 10-day trip to Asia on Wednesday. And who's butt is he going overseas to kiss this trip. What a POS.

otter
11-07-2009, 12:39 PM
Really? Because I wasn't particularly surprised by their appeasement of the Left.

:yeahthat: and that is exactly why Bush failed.

vraiblonde
11-07-2009, 01:41 PM
:yeahthat: and that is exactly why Bush failed.

I have numerous posts complaining about this very thing and expressing displeasure with any number of Bush dumb moves. Somehow that translates to me being loyal to Bush and him being my dear W.

Larry Gude
11-07-2009, 02:02 PM
I have numerous posts complaining about this very thing and expressing displeasure with any number of Bush dumb moves. Somehow that translates to me being loyal to Bush and him being my dear W.

What's the matter? Object to having your comments and positions mis- characterized?

Well, take heart. Calling your defense of him 'loyal' and him being your 'dear W', is a far cry from someone accusing you of calling him a Hitler and/or worst president, ever, had you simply said he made grave mistakes.

vraiblonde
11-07-2009, 02:58 PM
What's the matter? Object to having your comments and positions mis- characterized?

Well, take heart. Calling your defense of him 'loyal' and him being your 'dear W', is a far cry from someone accusing you of calling him a Hitler and/or worst president, ever, had you simply said he made grave mistakes.

My posts are right here in plain black and white.

As are yours.

PsyOps
11-07-2009, 03:06 PM
May I butt in here for a moment?

BO made his speech at the WH following the hoopla in the House on the healthcare scam. Obama said this bill is "fully paid for". $1.2 trillion!!!!!!! Can anyone tell me how?

itsbob
11-07-2009, 03:17 PM
May I butt in here for a moment?

BO made his speech at the WH following the hoopla in the House on the healthcare scam. Obama said this bill is "fully paid for". $1.2 trillion!!!!!!! Can anyone tell me how?

newt explained it..

the FIRST year (or maybe two) is paid for with no deficit spending. The bill gets approved for implementation in 2015 which means the first year of spending on healthcare is 7 years away.

The day the bill is signed the fundraising for the first year starts, to include drastic cuts to medicare/ medicaid, before they have other choices..

SO they have 7 years to enact extra taxes, cut current benefits all to pay for a single year.. After the first year, you have to pay as you go..

Now imagine, how big the bill is going to be for year 2, 3 4 and son on without having 7 years prior collections to pay for it.. Probably when Obama is not President, and someone else can be blamed for the HUGE spending and deficit..

PsyOps
11-07-2009, 07:15 PM
newt explained it..

the FIRST year (or maybe two) is paid for with no deficit spending. The bill gets approved for implementation in 2015 which means the first year of spending on healthcare is 7 years away.

The day the bill is signed the fundraising for the first year starts, to include drastic cuts to medicare/ medicaid, before they have other choices..

SO they have 7 years to enact extra taxes, cut current benefits all to pay for a single year.. After the first year, you have to pay as you go..

Now imagine, how big the bill is going to be for year 2, 3 4 and son on without having 7 years prior collections to pay for it.. Probably when Obama is not President, and someone else can be blamed for the HUGE spending and deficit..

I've heard of the front-end loading deal. There has never been cash to sit around in the federal coffers. They will find a way to blow that money on something else. It’s inevitable.

And isn’t that some transparency for you? “It’s paid for” without explaining how. Why can’t Americans tell when they are being blatantly lied to?

ImnoMensa
11-07-2009, 07:19 PM
newt explained it..

the FIRST year (or maybe two) is paid for with no deficit spending. The bill gets approved for implementation in 2015 which means the first year of spending on healthcare is 7 years away.

The day the bill is signed the fundraising for the first year starts, to include drastic cuts to medicare/ medicaid, before they have other choices..

SO they have 7 years to enact extra taxes, cut current benefits all to pay for a single year.. After the first year, you have to pay as you go..

Now imagine, how big the bill is going to be for year 2, 3 4 and son on without having 7 years prior collections to pay for it.. Probably when Obama is not President, and someone else can be blamed for the HUGE spending and deficit..

Just a thought here, but--------Have you ever seen the Government put billions of dollars away in a lockbox and then leave it alone.? This will belike a trust fund. Do you know what usually happens to Government trust funds.

Remember the Social Security trust fund??

Does anyone really think they will save this money with the US trillions of dollars in debt?? If you do I would like to sell you a new home on Kracatoa.


SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.