This_person
Well-Known Member
It would seem we really have three choices this election year, at least for president.
1. We could vote for a treasonous liar who has a demonstrated track record of damaging national security and failed foreign policy, not to mention an inability to control budgets (lost $6B).
2. We could vote for a newbie with a penchant for putting his foot in his mouth, who is easily agitated to non-diplomatic speech and action, and seems to be malleable in policy. He has a great advantage/disadvantage of not being indoctrinated in "the Washington Rules". He seems to love his country, but can't stay contained on a thought or even consistent on standards.
3. We could vote for an experienced fiscal conservative who would implement all of #1's social policies and improve upon #2's fiscal policies. In other words, he would get high and bankrupt us.
The question is this: Is it time to move to Australia?
1. We could vote for a treasonous liar who has a demonstrated track record of damaging national security and failed foreign policy, not to mention an inability to control budgets (lost $6B).
2. We could vote for a newbie with a penchant for putting his foot in his mouth, who is easily agitated to non-diplomatic speech and action, and seems to be malleable in policy. He has a great advantage/disadvantage of not being indoctrinated in "the Washington Rules". He seems to love his country, but can't stay contained on a thought or even consistent on standards.
3. We could vote for an experienced fiscal conservative who would implement all of #1's social policies and improve upon #2's fiscal policies. In other words, he would get high and bankrupt us.
The question is this: Is it time to move to Australia?
*poof*
