I still don't see how what you, or dslreports, disproves my point. The only thing that really matters is the point at which the ISP connects with the Internet. It doesn't matter if you share bandwidth with 10 neighbors locally with cable, or with a few hundred further up at the CO with DSL. Ultimately what makes a difference is the *total* number of users, and the bandwidth they can offer. It's kind of like, which way gets you to work faster - a ten-minute traffic snarl in your neighborhood with 10 neighbors, or a ten-minute wait at the base, with 100?
It depends on the company itself, and not the technology. Generally speaking - DSL has been, in *practice* IN THE U.S., faster to use. So your experience is very likely to prove favorable - but it doesn't mean the technology is worse. In other countries, such as Canada and Australia - DSL is clearly the poorer choice.
As I said - it's not the technology, it's the company.