As much as I hate to say it, I agree with Appyday's statements. I abhor the idea of horses going to slaughter - but I don't see any other choice in some situations. The elderly family pets, retired work horses, racehorses, foals - while to us it's horrible that "die for a few bucks," what are the other options? There aren't enough homes for them all - much less, enough GOOD homes that will take care of them all until they die peaceful deaths. Look at Cincy - of course, he had some good last few months - after two decades of neglect. I can't say that Cincy would have been better off going to slaughter years ago, because his life ended happily and with love - but what about all the other "Cincys" out there that will never be rescued?
I wish I could say that we, the American people, would take care of each and every horse that we wantonly create if we were to stop slaughter entirely. But we won't. And, seriously, what is the difference between slaughtering horses for food and putting down MILLIONS of dogs and cats at shelters across the country? Just because we're eating the horses? At least their deaths are good for something in some way. And, while their deaths aren't necessarily calm and serene, as we imagine they should be, keep in mind that some shelters still use gas chambers to euthanize unwanted pets - not a pretty death. And a very MEANINGLESS one at that.
The real problem is not the slaughter industry. It is people who have horses, dogs, cats, etc, that they exploit during their lives, such that their death is only a reflection of their existence.