:yahoo:

Target can sell Queer Tee Shirts, and I can shop somewhere else ........ Like the Dixie Chicks running their mouths in London, I don't have to purchase their CD's [I do get to laugh my ass off when the band tanks] :whistle:



Target Selling Pride Shirts to Help Pro-Gay Marriage Group — and Reportedly Blocking Emails From Those Complaining (http://www.theblaze.com/stories/target-selling-pride-shirts-to-help-pro-gay-marriage-group-and-reportedly-blocking-emails-from-those-complaining/)


Target Corp. is selling gay pride T-shirts to raise money for a group working to defeat a same-sex marriage ban in Minnesota — and is reportedly blocking emails from one group complaining about it.

The Minneapolis-based retailer — which came under fire two years ago for a $150,000 campaign donation in support of a gay marriage opponent — is currently selling special shirts with all proceeds benefiting the Family Equality Council.

In response, the American Family Association mobilized its supporters to urge Target to pull the shirts, but has since said the corporation is blocking emails sent through the organization’s internal system.

“I hope you will not let Target silence your voice. I encourage you to call their corporate office and share your personal thoughts,” the group told supporters.

I've pretty much done the same with J.C. Penney

Awesome I can Quit Shopping TargetHave you been forced to shop at Target until now? Were you locked in some kind of shopping contract wherein the only out was a "no gay t-shirts" clause?

I too will never step foot in a target again.
If they think the homo crowd can support them. Great for them. Moral citizens are obviously not needed for their bottom line.

Have you been forced to shop at Target until now?





Nope Not at All ..............

The way I see it is that Target caved to a boycott that was started because they gave money to a Minnesota? candidate that was against gay marriage,
There are more moral people in this country than there are homos, I would assume that a boycott from the moral would really send a signal.

Hmm, do they go for the 2% or do they go for the 98%,, hard business choice for sure.

Wirelessly posted

The way I see it is that Target caved to a boycott that was started because they gave money to a Minnesota? candidate that was against gay marriage,
There are more moral people in this country than there are homos, I would assume that a boycott from the moral would really send a signal.

Hmm, do they go for the 2% or do they go for the 98%,, hard business choice for sure.

I am sure the target is going to be crushed when all you homophobes stop shopping there. :bigwhoop:

It's funny When bigots try to clam the Moral high ground. :killingme

They can contribute money for this, but won't let the Marines collect "Toys for Tots" in front of their stores? Or Girl Scouts sell cookies? Or Salvation Army ring their bells?

It's funny When bigots try to clam the Moral high ground. :killingme

Not really.

I don't agree with them, but for many people, their religion teaches that it is immoral - so your statement doesn't make sense. They are claiming the moral high ground. Their understanding of what is moral differs from yours.

When Jews or Muslims don't eat pork or Mormons don't drink coffee because they believe it is wrong, I think it is weird, but I don't judge them on it.

Because THAT would be bigotry.

Wirelessly posted



I am sure the target is going to be crushed when all you homophobes stop shopping there. :bigwhoop:

It's funny When bigots try to clam the Moral high ground. :killingme

Almost as funny when bigots dont see their won bigotry.

and if all the moral people stopped shopping Target, they would have no choice but to close. Even a 25% drop in the moral shoppers would bring them to their knees.

[QUOTE=EmptyTimCup;4838285]:yahoo:

Bye.

I am a bigot, because I don't agree with something I think is morally reprehensible ............

I am not suggesting Gays be rounded up and put in camps, I just do not support their lifestyle .....


love the sinner NOT the Sin ...... by not purchasing goods needed on a weekly basis from a store that supports Homo's I am not supporting a company that does, I can spend my money elsewhere ........

[although I understand alot of companies spend 10's of thousands internally on functions supporting rainbow people]


no one screams bigot when Afro Centric's suggest blacks spend their money in stores owned by blacks and not stores owned by whites ....

no one screams bigot when La Raza 'the RACE' shouts from the public square for Hispanics



imagine the hue and cry if there was a White Group calling themselves 'The RACE'


:lol:

:killingme

:yahoo:

Target can sell Queer Tee Shirts, and I can shop somewhere else ........ Like the Dixie Chicks running their mouths in London, I don't have to purchase their CD's [I do get to laugh my ass off when the band tanks] :whistle:

This does bring up a good point though. I think I shall devote large amounts of time to researching every business I shop at to make sure that their policies, donations, products and their work practices align 100% to my core beliefs.

Not.

Chik fil a hates gays. I don't care. Just give me my damn waffle fries.

I am sure the target is going to be crushed when all you homophobes stop shopping there. :bigwhoop:

It's funny When bigots try to clam the Moral high ground. :killingme

You mean sort of like what you’re doing right now?

This does bring up a good point though. I think I shall devote large amounts of time to researching every business I shop at to make sure that their policies, donations, products and their work practices align 100% to my core beliefs.

Not.

Chik fil a hates gays. I don't care. Just give me my damn waffle fries.

Why is it so unacceptable for some folks to have strict core beliefs and actually make life decisions based on those beliefs?

No I don't spend hours doing research ......... when something likes this pops up on the radar I take note


like Natale Mains of the Dixie Chicks .... in the yr of all the hubub I went to 2 Toby Keith Concerts and purchased several of his CD's New and Older Music ..... Jingoistic Indeed :yahoo:


or James Cameron running his mouth about the environment, but has 3 Mansions and a carbon footprint bigger than 10 people w/his personal jet, puts out a movie like Avatar - Ooo look at the evil earthlings and the greedy corporation - I skip the festivities - and make a note not to see themin the theater or rent from nexflicks another movie by him




:evil: I download them from the internet :killingme

Why is it so unacceptable for some folks to have strict core beliefs and actually make life decisions based on those beliefs?

Because people hear something on the news and then run with it like it has suddenly impacted their lives in some profound way when really it's just something to complain about. If those people are really that concerned, then maybe they should make sure that all of their favorite stores check out. I mean, if they're REALLY that strict with their beliefs.

I was pointing out the absurdity of this kind of mind frame. Nobody does this. If a person did, I'd respect them immensely because that shows true commitment to their cause, even if it ran counter to mine. But in the end, my $2 boycott of Chik fil a really proves nothing. They don't care. Target won't miss you.

And btw, Target has also monetarily supported anti-gay politicians in the past... So maybe they're just balancing it out.

If Target really wanted to do the world a favor, they'd stop selling stretch pants and booty shorts in XXL.

I love Target.

snopes.com: Rumors About Target (http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/target.asp)

If Target really wanted to do the world a favor, they'd stop selling stretch pants and booty shorts in XXL.Saw one in Walmart yesterday. About 220 lbs squeezed into stretch pants. :barf:

I love Target.

snopes.com: Rumors About Target (http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/target.asp)



ok but that does not cover selling 'Pride' T-Shirts

ok but that does not cover selling 'Pride' T-Shirts
I am unsure I understand how a store selling a t shirt that probably wont come in your size anyways effects anything about you?

Will your car run funny afterwards?
Will you walk different?
Will the milk taste funny?
Will your dog run off?

Probably not. While I don't understand nor care if you shop there or anywhere else for that matter, I just thought maybe there was some sudden change that happened if you did

You mean sort of like what you’re doing right now?

show me where i claimed the moral high ground

I am unsure I understand how a store selling a t shirt that probably wont come in your size anyways effects anything about you?




Replace Pride T shirts with KKK or Aryan Nation T shirts ............. how about New Black Panther Party T Shirts, any political group you find offense and would not want to see Target Selling their t shirts


maybe Osama Bin Hidden Wife Beaters ...........

Not really.

I don't agree with them, but for many people, their religion teaches that it is immoral - so your statement doesn't make sense. They are claiming the moral high ground. Their understanding of what is moral differs from yours.

When Jews or Muslims don't eat pork or Mormons don't drink coffee because they believe it is wrong, I think it is weird, but I don't judge them on it.

Because THAT would be bigotry.

so judging someone because they dont drink coffee or dont eat pork IS bigotry but judging someone based on who they love is not bigotry? that makes no sense.

Also, if they are claiming a religious defense to their bigotry they need to read that parts about not judging others, love your brother, etc.

Replace Pride T shirts with KKK or Aryan Nation T shirts ............. how about New Black Panther Party T Shirts, any political group you find offense and would not want to see Target Selling their t shirts


maybe Osama Bin Hidden Wife Beaters ...........
So I don't buy it?

I don't like certain brands, but you might. Should I only shop in a place that only sells the brands I LIKE. Screw you if you don't?

No, so they sell t shirts. Lord knows I have enough other things to worry about than I silly t shirt.

Fact,

If people don't buy a certain brand of ANYTHING the store will stop carrying said brand.

Glasses/Stemware doesn't sell....they stop carrying.

I always pictured ETC as the "People of Walmart" type. :shrug:

Replace Pride T shirts with KKK or Aryan Nation T shirts ............. how about New Black Panther Party T Shirts, any political group you find offense and would not want to see Target Selling their t shirts


maybe Osama Bin Hidden Wife Beaters ...........

Or, heaven forbid, they are made in China by 6 year old girls!

They can contribute money for this, but won't let the Marines collect "Toys for Tots" in front of their stores? Or Girl Scouts sell cookies? Or Salvation Army ring their bells?

These are my reasons why I refuse to shop at target to begin with. They refuse to support anything like this...But then will throw all of their support behind sexual deviancy

These are my reasons why I refuse to shop at target to begin with. They refuse to support anything like this...But then will throw all of their support behind sexual deviancy
You should read that snopes post.

It might be good for you

Did you know that if you eat lucky charms you’ll turn gay? It's true it happened to my cousin. He ate breakfast one Saturday morning and "poof" queer. I think it was the rainbow on the box.

Did you know that if you eat lucky charms you’ll turn gay? It's true it happened to my cousin. He ate breakfast one Saturday morning and "poof" queer. I think it was the rainbow on the box.

It was the leprechaun. He is very influential and clearly homosexual.

It was the leprechaun. He is very influential and clearly homosexual.

He is "magically delicious"

I though the Leprechaun was a Pedo .......

He is "magically delicious"

Like a roofie for kids.

It was the leprechaun. He is very influential and clearly homosexual.

and his grammar is atrocious.

and his grammar is atrocious.

What does his kin folk have to do with this?

You should read that snopes post.

It might be good for you

and you should read what I was responding to...True:Target does not allow the Salvation Army to ring its bell out in front of their store

They send in a check to the marines for TFT but do they allow the convenient, drop off trailer on their property? No.

Can girl Scouts push their evil, hideous...yet oh so tasty drug known as "Thin Mints" on me in front of their stores? No.

My point is they do not show the support for non profits that so many other businesses show in the community. If you want the community to support your business, then that business needs to show it's support for it's community as well, in kind...outta RESPECT, or have we just lost all meaning of SUPPORT & RESPECT?

BTW... I support the LGBT community & their cause every time I take 2 drunk women back to my place & encourage & support them to just do what feels good & right to them :whistle:

Other thread = "It's private property, they can do what they want."

This thread = "I hate them for doing what they want on their own property."

and you should read what I was responding to...True:Target does not allow the Salvation Army to ring its bell out in front of their store

They send in a check to the marines for TFT but do they allow the convenient, drop off trailer on their property? No.

Can girl Scouts push their evil, hideous...yet oh so tasty drug known as "Thin Mints" on me in front of their stores? No.

My point is they do not show the support for non profits that so many other businesses show in the community. If you want the community to support your business, then that business needs to show it's support for it's community as well, in kind...outta RESPECT, or have we just lost all meaning of SUPPORT & RESPECT?

BTW... I support the LGBT community & their cause every time I take 2 drunk women back to my place & encourage & support them to just do what feels good & right to them :whistle:
and you should always read, They don't allow ANYONE to stand outside their doors. They stopped bending the rules. Ok so they stand behind their policy. I see nothing wrong with this. They still support them, and set up a huge online page for them.

So? I am unsure why the outcry still? Some people don't want it pushed on them, just like Christmas music.

and you should always read, They don't allow ANYONE to stand outside their doors.

and this is why I DO NOT & have not shopped there for many years now. They just are not very friendly. Like I said previously..."support us but don't expect the same in return from us."

Look, I can understand not letting panhandlers conduct their business out in front of their stores, but when I see a company that allows girl scouts, salvation army, club car washes, etc., that is an indication to me that business is community friendly & supportive of it's surrounding community. It gives me the warm & fuzzies.

Target doesn't give me the warm & fuzzies. As such, I refuse to support the cold & impersonal faceless corporation that it is.

Hell, he might have been a shrewd business prick, but at least I knew who Sam Walton was & what he looked like from some of wal mart's earlier commercials. Who owns Target?...Sarkozy? (yes, that was a shot at their T&F section :evil:)

show me where i claimed the moral high ground

When you have to resort to name-calling (i.e. homophobe and bigot) simply because you don't believe the same way they do, you have essentially claimed your beliefs are superior.

This thread has just made spending lots of money at Target so much more enjoyable. Thanks!! :yay:

When you have to resort to name-calling (i.e. homophobe and bigot) simply because you don't believe the same way they do, you have essentially claimed your beliefs are superior.

if you say so, but i certainly havn't said that i am more moral than anyone else, you know, claiming the moral high ground.

BCP hates gay people, and is bigoted about it. he expresses that regualrly here. go read Larry post from yesterday if you want another opion on it. That makes him a bigoted homophobe. that is no more resorting to name calling than calling a collie a dog or an african american black.

ok but that does not cover selling 'Pride' T-Shirts

That was aimed more towards whomever saying that Target doesn't support Toys for Tots.

Replace Pride T shirts with KKK or Aryan Nation T shirts ............. how about New Black Panther Party T Shirts, any political group you find offense and would not want to see Target Selling their t shirts


maybe Osama Bin Hidden Wife Beaters ...........


You're comparing gay marriage support to the KKK?

If anything the closer comparision would be the KKK and you're refusal to budge from your idea of traditional family values.

if you say so, but i certainly havn't said that i am more moral than anyone else, you know, claiming the moral high ground.

BCP hates gay people, and is bigoted about it. he expresses that regualrly here. go read Larry post from yesterday if you want another opion on it. That makes him a bigoted homophobe. that is no more resorting to name calling than calling a collie a dog or an african american black.

I’m not going to speak for BCP, but I would like to think he hates the behavior, not the person.

Fun Fact for you...

There are gay people on the internet. You guys should boycott that.

and this is why I DO NOT & have not shopped there for many years now. They just are not very friendly. Like I said previously..."support us but don't expect the same in return from us."

Look, I can understand not letting panhandlers conduct their business out in front of their stores, but when I see a company that allows girl scouts, salvation army, club car washes, etc., that is an indication to me that business is community friendly & supportive of it's surrounding community. It gives me the warm & fuzzies.

)


And I'm more likely to go to Target just so I don't have to weed my way through all the little 6 year olds and their fat girlscout mommas along with the kung fu class car wash just to buy some shampoo. No I don't want your friggen donuts and no I don't have any old eyeglasses to give your old a$$. Just let me go in the friggen store. :cds:

I’m not going to speak for BCP, but I would like to think he hates the behavior, not the person.

Pretty much but its wasted efforts to try and explain it to them.

As a matter of fact, I have often said that if they are really born that way, then it is a birth defect and we do them no favor by turning our heads to their problem.
If it is a choice then it would be a mental disorder and again, refusing to try and help them is in my opinion not at all a Christian attitude.


as far as homophobe? phobe denotes fear, I am not afraid.

I’m not going to speak for BCP, but I would like to think he hates the behavior, not the person.

you obviously havn't been reading his posts, they speak for themselves.

Wonder how many that are defending Target would continue to purchase items from a major name store that started selling God Hates Fags tee-shirts.

you obviously havn't been reading his posts, they speak for themselves.

your interpretation speaks for itself.

Wonder how many that are defending Target would continue to purchase items from a major name store that started selling God Hates Fags tee-shirts.
It's just a t-shirt.

Comparing Gay Pride w/ the KKK & The Black Panthers? :lmao:

What a ####ing idiot!!

your interpretation speaks for itself.

Nice comeback to Larry's post! :killingme Dick!

And I'm more likely to go to Target just so I don't have to weed my way through all the little 6 year olds and their fat girlscout mommas along with the kung fu class car wash just to buy some shampoo. No I don't want your friggen donuts and no I don't have any old eyeglasses to give your old a$$. Just let me go in the friggen store. :cds:
I am glad someone else sees it like that, it drives me nuts when they try to stand infront of you to collect for something.

And those girl scouts are in front of EVERY store. So not being infront of Target isn't hurting them

Comparing Gay Pride w/ the KKK & The Black Panthers? :lmao:

What a ####ing idiot!!

I met a gay Klansman in N.C. He had great skin.

It's just a t-shirt.

I dont see it that way.
If I own a store I would not sell either one, I dont agree with either one and dont think they are appropriate.
Someone at Target agrees with the gay pride thing, or they are caving into boycotts from the gay community with the hopes of not starting a boycott from the straight community.

The way I see it, the best thing for any store to do is to avoid either side of the issue, no donations to either side, no comments, no merchandise.

I met a gay Klansman in N.C. He had great skin.

Was he also black by chance?

I dont see it that way.
If I own a store I would not sell either one, I dont agree with either one and dont think they are appropriate.
Someone at Target agrees with the gay pride thing, or they are caving into boycotts from the gay community with the hopes of not starting a boycott from the straight community.

The way I see it, the best thing for any store to do is to avoid either side of the issue, no donations to either side, no comments, no merchandise.
So where do you shop now that most stores sell "gay" items.

I dont see it that way.
If I own a store I would not sell either one, I dont agree with either one and dont think they are appropriate.
Someone at Target agrees with the gay pride thing, or they are caving into boycotts from the gay community with the hopes of not starting a boycott from the straight community.

The way I see it, the best thing for any store to do is to avoid either side of the issue, no donations to either side, no comments, no merchandise.

in fact all stores should do that with all issues :sarcasm:
no prodcuts that anyone finds offensive will be available anywhere :killingme

So where do you shop now that most stores sell "gay" items.

Lane Bryant.....:killingme

I am glad someone else sees it like that, it drives me nuts when they try to stand infront of you to collect for something.

And those girl scouts are in front of EVERY store. So not being infront of Target isn't hurting them

Personally, I try to go around the people "selling" stuff out front of stores.

in fact all stores should do that with all issues :sarcasm:
no prodcuts that anyone finds offensive will be available anywhere :killingme

Hey, if the liberals can dictate what I eat, I see no reason they cant dictate what I see.

Was he also black by chance?

No. That would be crazy. He was a max security inmate in the N.C. Dept of Corrections. Baby smooth skin. He was popular.

And I'm more likely to go to Target just so I don't have to weed my way through all the little 6 year olds and their fat girlscout mommas along with the kung fu class car wash just to buy some shampoo. No I don't want your friggen donuts and no I don't have any old eyeglasses to give your old a$$. Just let me go in the friggen store. :cds:

don't be hating on old people who need some glasses

Lane Bryant.....:killingme
Are you kidding, gay guys work there.

(Not even kidding with you)

Hey, if the liberals can dictate what I eat, I see no reason they cant dictate what I see.

poor poor pitiful BCP, all them gay liberals are ruining his life, making him look at teeshirts and stuff :killingme

Hey, if the liberals can dictate what I eat, I see no reason they cant dictate what I see.
So why are you on the internet?

I really hate to be the one to break this to you again, but

The gay people are on the internet, and from what I heard you can get the "gay" from the internet!

So why are you on the internet?

I really hate to be the one to break this to you again, but

The gay people are on the internet, and from what I heard you can get the "gay" from the internet!

If you can get the gay, perhaps they can get the straight. If thats the case then I am doing them a service by being here.

Besides, I can block things gay on the internet, not so much in the store.
unless they set up gay section that is out of site from good families.

So why are you on the internet?

I really hate to be the one to break this to you again, but

The gay people are on the internet, and from what I heard you can get the "gay" from the internet!


I set my McAfee Plus to filter out the gay. No really I did.

If you can get the gay, perhaps they can get the straight. If thats the case then I am doing them a service by being here.

Besides, I can block things gay on the internet, not so much in the store.
unless they set up gay section that is out of site from good families.

yeah the bigot section is out back in the dumpster, you cant see any of the gay stuff from there. :whistle:

yeah the bigot section is out back in the dumpster, you cant see any of the gay stuff from there. :whistle:

since you think anyone that does not agree with homo lifestyle is a bigot, wouldnt that make you a bigot too?

If you can get the gay, perhaps they can get the straight. If thats the case then I am doing them a service by being here.

Besides, I can block things gay on the internet, not so much in the store.
unless they set up gay section that is out of site from good families.
Were you this against Interracial marriage?

Because if you were look how silly that was now.

since you think anyone that does not agree with homo lifestyle is a bigot, wouldnt that make you a bigot too?

not everyone who disagrees with homosexual lifestyles is a bigot. But you certainly have shown that you are.
this explains it as well as i could:

You raise an interesting point. Albeit, probably not one you meant to raise but, interesting none the less. Why am I not a homophobe and you are?

By your reasoning, homosexuality is a choice, one that is influenced by others. By that 5 year old mindset, I should be gay. I've been around flowers my entire life including retail shops in and around the DC area. I've been around gay people my entire life, including my brother. Some, I guess I kinda knew they were a little different at the time, stereotypically flamboyant. Most, I had no idea until I became an adult including my brother when he came out as a young teen. To this day, I still have the worlds worst gayday. One of the girls friend dad 'came out' a few years ago, a 40 year old man I'd seen regularly, hung out with, had a few beers with, I had no idea. :shrug:

I've never been molested by a gay. I've never been ripped off by a gay. I don't know that I've ever been lied to by one. The worst experience I've ever had with a gay person was being screamed at that I should be happy I was lucky enough to have been born straight and white as I defended Rush Limbaugh a tad too vigorously to a dear customer discussing, I thought until that point, politics in general. Shocked, I was. Hit a raw nerve with zero intention of doing so. Point being, I have no problem with gay people.

They can become stunningly boring after awhile at the parties I have been to that were predominately gay. Some are also terribly fun and entertaining. Some were, are, as stereotypically left wing as it gets. Some, I'd say most, are center-ish to right wing except for social issues. I've been in gay bars and felt, if only briefly, what women feel when they talk of being started at by wolves. :yikes: Couple of gal pals back in the day thought it would be a hoot to take me, Mr. Uber Hetro Red Neck, there. It was a hoot.

So, how come I'm not gay? How come gay people don't reflexively annoy or threaten me? I mean, I know the answer but, it's something to be considered in view of the homophobes view that gay people make others gay.

More to the point, why are you a homophobe? Over the years of debating this with you, you've said some rather vile things about gays including that. they're diseased, etc. You've said you know gay people. Maybe they are totally different than every last one I've known in my life? More to the point, most of the gay people I've known would be more in line with you and me and right wing governmental policies in general (less gummint, more individual freedom and responsibility) if only we, as a group, didn't act like they are sick monsters who want to make everyone else, including our kids, gay. Most of the gays I've known are successful, and rather influential. Coming out, that process, seems to tend to make people stronger, not counting, of course, the ones that took their own lives, succumbing to the societal pressure of something being terribly wrong with them rather than just different. Point being, I'd much rather have a gay on my political side than against. We push away people we agree with on more issues than not. THAT is what gets me about the anti gay thing. It's costing us.

So, given you tend to sound like a 14 year old boy that reflexively is against anything that isn't 'normal guy', foreigners, blacks, nice cloths, Flock of Seagulls, when discussing gay's and their agenda, why? You married a PR. How can you, especially NOT be understanding that 'different' isn't always 'wrong'?

:buddies: :popcorn:

and larry hits me as one of the less judgemental folks on the board

Were you this against Interracial marriage?

Because if you were look how silly that was now.

Why would I have been against interracial marriage? It was a male marrying a female as God intended. Two humans, opposite sex, healthy minds (assumed)

Why would I have been against interracial marriage? It was a male marrying a female as God intended. Two humans, opposite sex, healthy minds (assumed)
Well you seem to be against most things.


And to be honest even if you were against it you wouldn't own up to it now.


I surely hope your grandkids aren't gay.

if you say so, but i certainly havn't said that i am more moral than anyone else, you know, claiming the moral high ground.

BCP hates gay people, and is bigoted about it. he expresses that regualrly here. go read Larry post from yesterday if you want another opion on it. That makes him a bigoted homophobe. that is no more resorting to name calling than calling a collie a dog or an african american black.


I read as far as I care to on this thread. Your point would be more persuasive and compelling if you understood one simple thing; proper sentence structure and punctuation can be your friend. Perhaps that would add credence to your pointless argument. Lastly, just what is an opion, a black dog or a white idiot? I forgot to add one bit of fact, "Ernie" Els is a South African professional golfer. Would that would make him an African American if he decided to get U.S Citizenship? Last time I checked he is not "black."

The gay people are on the internet,




there are Gay people at work I treat them equally ........ I do not have to spend my money supporting their life style .....

there are Gay people at work I treat them equally ........ I do not have to spend my money supporting their life style .....

Is Target funding some sort of Gay/Lesbian club?

I read as far as I care to on this thread. Your point would be more persuasive and compelling if you understood one simple thing; proper sentence structure and punctuation can be your friend. Perhaps that would add credence to your pointless argument. Lastly, just what is an opion, a black dog or a white idiot? I forgot to add one bit of fact, "Ernie" Els is a South African professional golfer. Would that would make him an African American if he decided to get U.S Citizenship? Last time I checked he is not "black."

you know a poster has absolutely nothing to add when they start with correcting puncuation and spelling.

why dont you express your "opion" on the topic at hand instead of just being a douche?

Well you seem to be against most things.


And to be honest even if you were against it you wouldn't own up to it now.


I surely hope your grandkids aren't gay.

why do all gay lovers always have to resort to the " I hope your Fill in the blank isnt gay" argument.
Besides, if they were actually if they were it would be up to my daughter, but lets just pretend I had any say in it, I would do everything I could to get them help.
And if gay isnt a learned thing, then why are so many school kids dabbling in the gay arts now? because the liberal schools are teaching that its acceptable and cool.
Fortunately, there are still enough good parents left that do teach their children that its not natural, and its not an act of compassion to just ignore it medically.
You wouldn't ignore trying to help autistic, or people born blind or deaf would you? then I don't understand the willingness to ignore someone that may or may not have been born gay.

why do all gay lovers always have to resort to the " I hope your Fill in the blank isnt gay" argument.
Besides, if they were actually if they were it would be up to my daughter, but lets just pretend I had any say in it, I would do everything I could to get them help.
And if gay isnt a learned thing, then why are so many school kids dabbling in the gay arts now? because the liberal schools are teaching that its acceptable and cool.
Fortunately, there are still enough good parents left that do teach their children that its not natural, and its not an act of compassion to just ignore it medically.
You wouldn't ignore trying to help autistic, or people born blind or deaf would you? then I don't understand the willingness to ignore someone that may or may not have been born gay.
I am so glad I got to meet a Doctor that has the CURE!!!


OH PRAISE JESUS!! I thought it would never go away.


:lol: You crack me up, mostly because I think it's really sad.

Any dude that has a problem with two hot chicks doing there thing, is not a straight dude! :coffee:

why do all gay lovers always have to resort to the " I hope your Fill in the blank isnt gay" argument.
Besides, if they were actually if they were it would be up to my daughter, but lets just pretend I had any say in it, I would do everything I could to get them help.
And if gay isnt a learned thing, then why are so many school kids dabbling in the gay arts now? because the liberal schools are teaching that its acceptable and cool.
Fortunately, there are still enough good parents left that do teach their children that its not natural, and its not an act of compassion to just ignore it medically.
You wouldn't ignore trying to help autistic, or people born blind or deaf would you? then I don't understand the willingness to ignore someone that may or may not have been born gay.


yeah but you dont tell blind, deaf, or autistic people that they cant marry or that they need to choose to no longer be blind, deaf, or autisitc :shrug:


BTW, that some people choose to experiment in no way means that others aren't born that way.

I am so glad I got to meet a Doctor that has the CURE!!!


OH PRAISE JESUS!! I thought it would never go away.


:lol: You crack me up, mostly because I think it's really sad.

Never will find a cure if they don't look for one. Just like cancer, 30 years ago? no cure, today Cures for most, why? they kept at it and didn't just consider it a normal condition.
What I think is really sad is your lack of concern or compassion to the afflicted.

Any dude that has a problem with two hot chicks doing there thing, is not a straight dude! :coffee: So, if someone does not embrace the lifestyle, they are gay? :killingme ummmm, ok.

yeah but you dont tell blind, deaf, or autistic people that they cant marry or that they need to choose to no longer be blind, deaf, or autisitc :shrug:


BTW, that some people choose to experiment in no way means that others aren't born that way.
But you do restrict those people from doing other things that others can right? I mean, based on what their issue is certain restrictions apply. Dont know too many blind people that drive themselves to the store.
And you tell them they have to choose to no longer be, but you certainly do work with them to make their lives more normal.

as far as your last statement, it must be false, after all, don't the gay talking points direct you to ask who would choose to be gay? Contradiction

why do all gay lovers always have to resort to the " I hope your Fill in the blank isnt gay" argument.
Besides, if they were actually if they were it would be up to my daughter, but lets just pretend I had any say in it, I would do everything I could to get them help.
And if gay isnt a learned thing, then why are so many school kids dabbling in the gay arts now? because the liberal schools are teaching that its acceptable and cool.
Fortunately, there are still enough good parents left that do teach their children that its not natural, and its not an act of compassion to just ignore it medically.
You wouldn't ignore trying to help autistic, or people born blind or deaf would you? then I don't understand the willingness to ignore someone that may or may not have been born gay.

:roflmao:

Never will find a cure if they don't look for one. Just like cancer, 30 years ago? no cure, today Cures for most, why? they kept at it and didn't just consider it a normal condition.
What I think is really sad is your lack of concern or compassion to the afflicted.

You would compare those? While Cancer can kill you....

being gay does not.

And don't you dare use AIDs because straight people have and get AIDs

You would compare those? While Cancer can kill you....

being gay does not.

And don't you dare use AIDs because straight people have and get AIDs

yes, and it was introduced by the gay community, and it spreads by those nasty confused people that jump back and forth over the fence.
without gays, the Aids would have not have even hit the radar.
and, pretty much based on that alone, one can show that homosexuals are a public health hazard.

Thanks for pointing that out.

yes, and it was introduced by the gay community, and it spreads by those nasty confused people that jump back and forth over the fence.
without gays, the Aids would have not have even hit the radar.
and, pretty much based on that alone, one can show that homosexuals are a public health hazard.

Thanks for pointing that out.
So lets make this as clear as mud...


We shouldn't shop at Target, because
selling a t shirt might make you gay,
buying anything at said store will make you gay
living near said store will make you gay
knowing of such things will make you gay

Right?? Clear as mud

BTW You are welcome BCP I would hate for you to be uneducated on a topic you know so much about.


:lol:

Never will find a cure if they don't look for one. Just like cancer, 30 years ago? no cure, today Cures for most, why? they kept at it and didn't just consider it a normal condition.

What I think is really sad is your lack of concern or compassion to the afflicted.



NO Doctor is looking ......... being attracted to the same same sex was deleted as a mental defect 3 or more decades ago

NO Doctor is looking ......... being attracted to the same same sex was deleted as a mental defect 3 or more decades ago

Yes I know. Gee, I wonder how many of those psychologists at the APA that determined it was not a disorder, have pictures of themselves with their gay partners on their desks...

you obviously havn't been reading his posts, they speak for themselves.

Actually I take his posts tongue-in-cheek; serving no more purpose than to get a rise out of you. And he's gets you every time. :lol:

being gay does not.

And don't you dare use AIDs because straight people have and get AIDs



Bet Me ........ although it does not seem to have killed off Black Francis yet

:jet:




Do more gays have A.I.D.S. then straight people? (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1359527)


AIDS Rate 50 Times Higher in Homosexual Men: Center for Disease Control (http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2009/aug/09082609)


1 in 5 Gay/Bi Men Have HIV, Nearly Half Don't Know (http://www.webmd.com/hiv-aids/news/20100923/1-in-5-gay-bi-men-have-hiv-nearly-half-dont-know)
CDC Study Shows Gay/Bisexual African-Americans, Young Adults Least Aware of HIV Status

why do all gay lovers always have to resort to the " I hope your Fill in the blank isnt gay" argument.

Same reason people use the "I hope your kids don't get mauled by your pitbull" argument....

You know, if a man can be born to embrace homosexuality, why cant a man be born that despises homosexuality.

I think I was born this way, and to be honest, I am seriously tired of you bigots trying to change the way I was born.

Note: just as much fact in someone being born either way.

y'all need to back off and embrace us for our thoughts.

Same reason people use the "I hope your kids don't get mauled by your pitbull" argument....

because deep down they really do hope that your kid gets mauled by a pittbull to teach you a lesson?

You know, if a man can be born to embrace homosexuality, why cant a man be born that despises homosexuality.

I think I was born this way, and to be honest, I am seriously tired of you bigots trying to change the way I was born.

Note: just as much fact in someone being born either way.

y'all need to back off and embrace us for our thoughts.

You were probably touched by a priest when you were a kid or blown by your neighborhood creepy guy....:yay:

because deep down they really do hope that your kid gets mauled by a pittbull to teach you a lesson?

Who knows....or, because it's easy to sit behind a computer screen and spew hatred.

So lets make this as clear as mud...


We shouldn't shop at Target, because
selling a t shirt might make you gay,
buying anything at said store will make you gay

Right?? Clear as mud


Nope Ms Obtuse, never said it would MAKE ME Ghey .......... only I was not shopping somewhere that supported Gay Life Style, selling Pride T Shirts ....... I will take my money elsewhere .............


are you projecting for some lipstick lesbian GF ?

You were probably touched by a priest when you were a kid or blown by your neighborhood creepy guy....:yay:

Not Catholic, so no priest and no neighborhood creepy guy.
I think you might be thinking of your own childhood, and this might explain your desire to normalize a deviant act.
Its ok, you were a child, you did nothing wrong..

Who knows....or, because it's easy to sit behind a computer screen and spew hatred.

it really is.
The true art comes in holding your position when in pubic.

Yes I know. Gee, I wonder how many of those psychologists at the APA that determined it was not a disorder, have pictures of themselves with their gay partners on their desks...



Ahh APA ....

.... HRC always gave me the creeps .....

Nope Ms Obtuse, never said it would MAKE ME Ghey .......... only I was not shopping somewhere that supported Gay Life Style, selling Pride T Shirts ....... I will take my money elsewhere .............


are you projecting for some lipstick lesbian GF ?
:lol: "Why does everyone go to .... " :lol:

Oh you crack me up. No I am very happy with the man I am with Thanks though. I find no need to stand for against being Gay.

I just find it to be beyond funny when people shout for boycotting some place that shows support for something.

I do feel like I am living back when equal rights were the fight.

So lets make this as clear as mud...


We shouldn't shop at Target, because
selling a t shirt might make you gay,
buying anything at said store will make you gay
living near said store will make you gay
knowing of such things will make you gay

Right?? Clear as mud
I think the outrage expressed by those defending Target a bit over the top.

I read the entire thread. Did not see anywhere where anyone said that shopping at, living near, selling a tee shirt, would make anyone homosexual. I do not like that the word gay has been hijacked.

Fact is you can choose to spend your money anywhere you choose for any reason you choose. If someone chooses not to spend their money at a place of business because that business supports or does not support something, then they have every right to do so. To criticize someone for "voting" with their spending is criticizing a person for a very basic right.

yes, and it was introduced by the gay community, and it spreads by those nasty confused people that jump back and forth over the fence.
without gays, the Aids would have not have even hit the radar.
and, pretty much based on that alone, one can show that homosexuals are a public health hazard.

Thanks for pointing that out.

As to AIDS, while it was spread through the homosexual community, the original source was likely from bestiality. It is quite possible someone got sexual with a green monkey which is prevalent with the virus. Syphilis is prevalent in sheep and gonorrhea is prevalent in swine. It is likely that aberrant sex is responsible for most if not all of the STDs.

Actually I take his posts tongue-in-cheek; serving no more purpose than to get a rise out of you. And he's gets you every time. :lol:



This one is not strong with The Force


:evil:

Who knows....or, because it's easy to sit behind a computer screen and spew hatred.



is it hatred to run and Organization called La Raza - aka The RACE that means to raise Mexicans above the rest of us ...... in racial superiority

is it hatred to run and Organization called La Raza - aka The RACE that means to raise Mexicans above the rest of us ...... in racial superiority

Seems like it's paying off....

it really is.
The true art comes in holding your position when in pubic.




Black Francis / Hank / Craig is still a retard ......... :whistle:





:popcorn:

I think the outrage expressed by those defending Target a bit over the top.

I read the entire thread. Did not see anywhere where anyone said that shopping at, living near, selling a tee shirt, would make anyone homosexual. I do not like that the word gay has been hijacked.

Fact is you can choose to spend your money anywhere you choose for any reason you choose. If someone chooses not to spend their money at a place of business because that business supports or does not support something, then they have every right to do so. To criticize someone for "voting" with their spending is criticizing a person for a very basic right.



As to AIDS, while it was spread through the homosexual community, the original source was likely from bestiality. It is quite possible someone got sexual with a green monkey which is prevalent with the virus. Syphilis is prevalent in sheep and gonorrhea is prevalent in swine. It is likely that aberrant sex is responsible for most if not all of the STDs.
actually the likely source was from hunting, when the hunters cleaned the monkey the blood could get into their cuts. So it would have been a blood to blood transfer. There are also to variates of the Virus. one from monkeys, one from,, cant remember but its a different animal.

I just find it to be beyond funny when people shout for boycotting some place that shows support for something.





why did the left call for a boycott of Rush ......... I stated Personally I was not longer to shop Target ...... I never called for a Boycott



:popcorn:

I think the outrage expressed by those defending Target a bit over the top.

I read the entire thread. Did not see anywhere where anyone said that shopping at, living near, selling a tee shirt, would make anyone homosexual. I do not like that the word gay has been hijacked.

Fact is you can choose to spend your money anywhere you choose for any reason you choose. If someone chooses not to spend their money at a place of business because that business supports or does not support something, then they have every right to do so. To criticize someone for "voting" with their spending is criticizing a person for a very basic right.



As to AIDS, while it was spread through the homosexual community, the original source was likely from bestiality. It is quite possible someone got sexual with a green monkey which is prevalent with the virus. Syphilis is prevalent in sheep and gonorrhea is prevalent in swine. It is likely that aberrant sex is responsible for most if not all of the STDs.

For heaven's sake..HIV was not transmitted to humans via sex with monkeys. It was in all likelyhood transmitted by humans butchering monkeys for meat.

:popcorn:

pussy

For heaven's sake..HIV was not transmitted to humans via sex with monkeys. It was in all likelyhood transmitted by humans butchering monkeys for meat.



shhhh....let the idiots continue with their knowledge of all things Gay. :lol:



I find it quite entertaining that all of these that are sooooo against homosexuals seem to know soooooo much about it.

Craig / Hank / Black Francis / Crewdog This user is on your Ignore List.

UAyh23l1mx4

:jet:

This message is hidden because Hank is on your ignore list.

and the dumb scumbag responds again .........

if a retard, on ignore, responds to a post, and you don't read it, did he really say anything ......


:moon:

:killingme ETC once again proving his age of 12 years old....Too funny! :killingme

For heaven's sake..HIV was not transmitted to humans via sex with monkeys. It was in all likelyhood transmitted by humans butchering monkeys for meat.

That is indeed a possibility as is sexual contact. Sex with animals is practiced by some.

shhhh....let the idiots continue with their knowledge of all things Gay. :lol:



I find it quite entertaining that all of these that are sooooo against homosexuals seem to know soooooo much about it.

come on now, libertytyranny would not have known to post that if I would not have posted it first.

and you gloss over my superior knowledge in this matter.

Wirelessly posted

you obviously havn't been reading his posts, they speak for themselves.

Actually I take his posts tongue-in-cheek; serving no more purpose than to get a rise out of you. And he's gets you every time. :lol:

:bs:
He fights way to hard to be just making a joke. Have you not read larrys post? Clearly Larry knows the guys AND knows that his homophobia is no act.

Wirelessly posted



:bs:
He fights way to hard to be just making a joke. Have you not read larrys post? Clearly Larry knows the guys AND knows that his homophobia is no act.

And for some reason, BCP's big fat mouth had no retort to Larry's post....:killingme

For heaven's sake..HIV was not transmitted to humans via sex with monkeys. It was in all likelyhood transmitted by humans butchering monkeys for meat.

Actually I remember reading it's speculated from eating monkey brains.

:bs:
He fights way to hard to be just making a joke. Have you not read larrys post? Clearly Larry knows the guys AND knows that his homophobia is no act.

Yet you are obsessed with what he believes.

And Larry only believes what I tell him to believe. :jet:

And for some reason, BCP's big fat mouth had no retort to Larry's post....:killingme

not exactly sure what you are talking about with Larry's post and my comment,

pretty shallow of you when you think about it, all I would have to do to be best buddies with you is agree with you on gay matters.

not exactly sure what you are talking about with Larry's post and my comment,

pretty shallow of you when you think about it, all I would have to do to be best buddies with you is agree with you on gay matters.

Larry asked you why you were a 14 year old homophobe... You had no reply.

Actually I remember reading it's speculated from eating monkey brains.

Most recent explanation is the transfer of blood from butchering them.
The brain theory was based on early 1970s research that found the highest concentration of the virus in the brain.

Larry asked you why you were a 14 year old homophobe... You had no reply.

you would have to understand that I don't usually read anything larry post.

nothing personal larry.

and to the best of my recollection, I am just a few years past that 14 year old age.
Larry should really stick to what is fact and what he knows when he posts. I wasn't posting on here at 14

Wirelessly posted

:bs:
He fights way to hard to be just making a joke. Have you not read larrys post? Clearly Larry knows the guys AND knows that his homophobia is no act.

Yet you are obsessed with what he believes.

And Larry only believes what I tell him to believe. :jet:

Meh, not at all obsessed over bcp's comments.

But I notice you have no repsonse to the meat of what Larry or I have said.

Yummy Yum. I just got waffle fries at Chik fil a. They always look at me funny when I go in there. Maybe they can tell I'm gay and they think I'm nuts...

Yummy Yum. I just got waffle fries at Chik fil a. They always look at me funny when I go in there. Maybe they can tell I'm gay and they think I'm nuts...

Not big on their fries, but I do like the chicken sandwich they have.
now if they had McDonalds fries with their Chicken sandwich we would have a winner.

They can contribute money for this, but won't let the Marines collect "Toys for Tots" in front of their stores? Or Girl Scouts sell cookies? Or Salvation Army ring their bells?

Those things don't bring in money.

Yummy Yum. I just got waffle fries at Chik fil a.




Waffle Fries Rock ....... holds lots of BBQ Sauce

Those things don't bring in money.

and I bet if the Marines asked to use a few spots in the back of the parking lot it would be allowed.

but I tend to think you are not totally correct with the not bringing in money, on more than one occasion I have bought a toy just to give it to those collecting outside the store. So that is a sale they would not have had if the collectors were not there.

you know a poster has absolutely nothing to add when they start with correcting puncuation and spelling.

why dont you express your "opion" on the topic at hand instead of just being a douche?

I did, and did so without resorting to childlike name-calling. Re-read my post if you can pay attention that long.

MrWeb
back in the day, oodles of noodles and Iron City beer (.99 cent a six pack) got me through college.
your Iron City just put a smile on my face.

P.S.
There were no gay couples back then in college as far as I know.
I'm sure they were there, its just that they used to install better locks on closet doors.
Those locks were weakened due to liberal regulations that stated a child locked in the closet for disciplinary reasons, had to be able to let himself out if the parents forgot he was there.

Little history lesson that many don't know.

you locked skillet in the closet ........... :cds:

you locked skillet in the closet ........... :cds:

Well thats different, I locked her in to keep her away from the homo loving educators in our state schools.
She does have friends who pretend to be gay, but since they first were dating properly, I can only assume that they made a choice based on the teachings that it is acceptable and cool to be deviant.

Well that's different, I locked her in to keep her away from the homo loving educators in our state schools.





Awesome ...........

Wirelessly posted

you know a poster has absolutely nothing to add when they start with correcting puncuation and spelling.

why dont you express your "opion" on the topic at hand instead of just being a douche?

I did, and did so without resorting to childlike name-calling. Re-read my post if you can pay attention that long.

Went back and read your idiocy again and not a single bit of it was about target or gays or anything else related to the OP. Your entire post was devoid of any substance and was nothing more that a childish attack :yay:
And for someone who is pointing out other peoples grammar mistakes......

Would that would make him an African American if he decided to get U.S Citizenship?

I heard on WMAL a couple days ago, there was survey done, the Perception among those surveyed ... thinking about Hollywood Movies, TV and so on ........

What % of the Population do you think is Gay ............

most people believe around 25% of the US Pop. is gay

funny thing is, the actual # is 2 %

2% of the Population, and more and more business are hassled with lawsuits, for NOT wanting to Sell Rainbow Cup Cakes, Print their Advertisements ......... and so on


:popcorn:

Waffle Fries Rock ....... holds lots of BBQ Sauce

Finally, SOMEthing we agree on!! :buddies:

Finally, SOMEthing we agree on!! :buddies:

did you know that waffle fries were invented by a gay guy.
he was making real fries when a co-worker walked in front and he got a boner, thus poking holes in the fry mush.

they were originally sold under the name of fagfries, but it was changed due to low sales numbers.

A gays in history moment

Finally, SOMEthing we agree on!! :buddies:

I usually mix;

2 packs of BBQ
2 Packs of Mayo
4 Packs of Hot Sauce

12 packs if pepper .......... stir well

lots of dipping sauce ...... :evil:

did you know that waffle fries were invented by a gay guy.
he was making real fries when a co-worker walked in front and he got a boner, thus poking holes in the fry mush.

they were originally sold under the name of fagfries, but it was changed due to low sales numbers.

A gays in history moment

That story was.... epic. You should submit that to reader's digest. Be sure to put your real name and address.

Btw, Do you have friends in real life? How much do you pay them?

I usually mix;

2 packs of BBQ
2 Packs of Mayo
4 Packs of Hot Sauce

12 packs if pepper .......... stir well

lots of dipping sauce ...... :evil:

Okay... you lost me after 2 packs of BBQ. So, we ALMOST agree on something.

That story was.... epic. You should submit that to reader's digest. Be sure to put your real name and address.

Btw, Do you have friends in real life? How much do you pay them?

Im sorry, do you only agree with good homo stories?

lets see
did you know that during the chicago fire, homosexual firemen saved hundreds of men from the flames the promptly rump ranged them knowing full well that the damage would be blamed on the fire?

Im sorry, do you only agree with good homo stories?

lets see
did you know that during the chicago fire, homosexual firemen saved hundreds of men from the flames the promptly rump ranged them knowing full well that the damage would be blamed on the fire?

What 12-year-old boy are you holding at gun point for these riveting stories?

What 12-year-old boy are you holding at gun point for these riveting stories?

sorry, Im not gay, I have no interest in 12 year old boys.
you mistake me for a gay child molesting priest.

and that is another issue, the catholic church allows gays to be priests. WHY?? in the first place they choose to be gay, they cannot be devoted to the Bible. in the second they are gay, why would you allow any gay guy to have supreme control over young boys, their choice of partners.

sorry, Im not gay, I have no interest in 12 year old boys.
you mistake me for a gay child molesting priest.

and that is another issue, the catholic church allows gays to be priests. WHY?? in the first place they choose to be gay, they cannot be devoted to the Bible. in the second they are gay, why would you allow any gay guy to have supreme control over young boys, their choice of partners.

Well then, your knowledge of all this gay lore is something of an enigma then. (your story is safe with me.. wink wink nudge nudge) Now, if only we all had the time and dedication to thoroughly research (or make up stories about) the things we loathe.

Well then, your knowledge of all this gay lore is something of an enigma then. (your story is safe with me.. wink wink nudge nudge) Now, if only we all had the time and dedication to thoroughly research (or make up stories about) the things we loathe.

I have plenty of time, I have investments, a retirement check and a job that allows for internet play. and a working wife that actually makes more than the national average.
basically put, I guess Im a loser.

Well then, your knowledge of all this gay lore is something of an enigma then. (your story is safe with me.. wink wink nudge nudge) Now, if only we all had the time and dedication to thoroughly research (or make up stories about) the things we loathe.

I do notice that you did not deny the fact that the vast majority of child molestations coming up in the news have all been perpetrated by homos.

sorry, Im not gay, I have no interest in 12 year old boys.
you mistake me for a gay child molesting priest.

and that is another issue, the catholic church allows gays to be priests. WHY?? in the first place they choose to be gay, they cannot be devoted to the Bible. in the second they are gay, why would you allow any gay guy to have supreme control over young boys, their choice of partners.


I think your problem is that you relate gay to pedofile. They are not one in the same. Thinking so is what makes you a bigot. I would love for you to go to the sex offenders web site and survey any 50 and get back to me on those that are gay and rape kids. Without looking up statistics; I'm pretty comfortable in saying that about 95% of them are straight. So - why do they let straight guys e priests and have supreme control over little boys?? Statistically speaking they're the ones more likely to stick it to them behind the alter...

I think your problem is that you relate gay to pedofile. They are not one in the same. Thinking so is what makes you a bigot. I would love for you to go to the sex offenders web site and survey any 50 and get back to me on those that are gay and rape kids. Without looking up statistics; I'm pretty comfortable in saying that about 95% of them are straight. So - why do they let straight guys e priests and have supreme control over little boys?? Statistically speaking they're the ones more likely to stick it to them behind the alter...

here is YOUR problem, you fail to understand that there are two types of peds, straight peds, and ###peds,
straight peds are going to be attracted to the opposite sex
###peds are going to be attracted to the same sex.
the majority of molestation cases right now are male ped on male victim, this indicates that homos are more prone to commit molestation than straights.

please use logic if you are going to try and sound like you know something.

I do notice that you did not deny the fact that the vast majority of child molestations coming up in the news have all been perpetrated by homos.

That would have been predictable. And you didn't cite anything stating any truth to that. Remember that part where I said you make stuff up?

I do notice that you did not deny the fact that the vast majority of child molestations coming up in the news have all been perpetrated by homos.

Your original statement had to do with priests. You don't even remember the words you write. You're laughable.

here is YOUR problem, you fail to understand that there are two types of peds, straight peds, and ### peds,
straight peds are going to be attracted to the opposite sex
### peds are going to be attracted to the same sex.
the majority of molestation cases right now are male ped on male victim, this indicates that homos are more prone to commit molestation than straights.

please use logic if you are going to try and sound like you know something.


That is not true at all idiot - child molesters straight and gay alike; feed on the power of raping little kiddies....male and female. You assuming that males raping little boys are automatically gay is where you have your problems. Does that mean all the little girls getting molested are getting done by lesbos?? Your argument is weak.
Someone posted earlier that there are really only 2% of the population are gay. If all these little boys getting but holed are from gay's, then that must mean that all 2% are kiddie rapists. I know a handful of gays; none of them have molested little girls/boys. Can't say the same for some of the straights I know.
Hell Sendusky(sp) was married...he loved little boys; but still boned women. Even married one. Go figure.

Your original statement had to do with priests. You don't even remember the words you write. You're laughable.

lets see, in the news, the majority of molestation cases are priests
I dont actually remember any priest molesting a girl
priests are male
therefore its male on male
thats homo

I remember what I wrote, the problem seems to be your comprehension.

sorry, perhaps I should include pictures and captions so those with your intellect can keep up?

That is not true at all idiot - child molesters straight and gay alike; feed on the power of raping little kiddies....male and female. You assuming that males raping little boys are automatically gay is where you have your problems. Does that mean all the little girls getting molested are getting done by lesbos?? Your argument is weak.
Someone posted earlier that there are really only 2% of the population are gay. If all these little boys getting but holed are from gay's, then that must mean that all 2% are kiddie rapists. I know a handful of gays; none of them have molested little girls/boys. Can't say the same for some of the straights I know.
Hell Sendusky(sp) was married...he loved little boys; but still boned women. Even married one. Go figure.
Oh I see,
so I want to have some sex and at the same time hold power over someone, so, being straight, Im going to choose to suck some little kids crank.
certainly would never consider molesting a girl in my straight mind.

The idiots are those like you that try to hid the true facts in order to protect a certain class of people. You are as much to blame for the molestations as the person doing the crime.

You disgust me.

lets see, in the news, the majority of molestation cases are priests
I dont actually remember any priest molesting a girl
priests are male
therefore its male on male
thats homo

I remember what I wrote, the problem seems to be your comprehension.

sorry, perhaps I should include pictures and captions so those with your intellect can keep up?


well, just stay your ass out of church and you'll be just fine...no gay germs in your communion cup or anything.

lets see, in the news, the majority of molestation cases are priests
I dont actually remember any priest molesting a girl
priests are male
therefore its male on male
thats homo

I remember what I wrote, the problem seems to be your comprehension.

sorry, perhaps I should include pictures and captions so those with your intellect can keep up?

You wrote "and that is another issue, the catholic church allows gays to be priests. WHY?? in the first place they choose to be gay, they cannot be devoted to the Bible. in the second they are gay, why would you allow any gay guy to have supreme control over young boys, their choice of partners."

You made no mention about "vast majority in the news". I'm guessing I'm getting trolled right now. This must be why no one likes you.

Oh I see,
so I want to have some sex and at the same time hold power over someone, so, being straight, Im going to choose to suck some little kids crank.
certainly would never consider molesting a girl in my straight mind.

The idiots are those like you that try to hid the true facts in order to protect a certain class of people. You are as much to blame for the molestations as the person doing the crime.

You disgust me.


wow, your ignorance amazes me.

wow, your ignorance amazes me.

The ignorance comes from someone so afraid to profile that they will continue to turn their heads.

again, you disgust me, you are the reason that so many boys are molested.
Its as if you did it yourself.

here is YOUR problem, you fail to understand that there are two types of peds, straight peds, and ###peds,
straight peds are going to be attracted to the opposite sex
###peds are going to be attracted to the same sex.
the majority of molestation cases right now are male ped on male victim, this indicates that homos are more prone to commit molestation than straights.

please use logic if you are going to try and sound like you know something.

Characterstics of Child Victims

#1. Nearly all the offenders in sexual assaults reported to law enforcement were male (96%).
- Sexual Assault of Young Children as Reported to Law Enforcement, 7/00, NCJ 182990, U.S. Department of Justice

#2. U. S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics has combined a study of characteristics among those child victims of convicted sex offenders and child molesters. These statistics are based on the reports of offenders in the Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities, and include the following:

* Three out of four children who were victimized were female.
* One-third of the convicted offenders had committed a crime against their own child.
* About half of the convicted offenders had a relationship with the child, either through friends or family.
* Only one out of seven inmates reported that their child victim was a stranger.
* Four out of ten child victims suffered forcible rape or another injury from child molesters.

Characterstics of Child Victims

#1. Nearly all the offenders in sexual assaults reported to law enforcement were male (96%).
- Sexual Assault of Young Children as Reported to Law Enforcement, 7/00, NCJ 182990, U.S. Department of Justice

#2. U. S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics has combined a study of characteristics among those child victims of convicted sex offenders and child molesters. These statistics are based on the reports of offenders in the Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities, and include the following:

* Three out of four children who were victimized were female.
* One-third of the convicted offenders had committed a crime against their own child.
* About half of the convicted offenders had a relationship with the child, either through friends or family.
* Only one out of seven inmates reported that their child victim was a stranger.
* Four out of ten child victims suffered forcible rape or another injury from child molesters.
and this proves they were not homos in what way?
We have already learned from the homo lovers that many homos are living a lie and are marred (to a woman) with children.

so you are trying to prove what in what way with your post?

and this proves they were not homos in what way?
We have already learned from the homo lovers that many homos are living a lie and are marred (to a woman) with children.

so you are trying to prove what in what way with your post?

Alright. Done wasting my time on you. You dragged me along this far. My bad. I'll let you get back to your gay porn now. Bye.

Alright. Done wasting my time on you. You dragged me along this far. My bad. I'll let you get back to your gay porn now. Bye.

Oh yes, the typical "I lost the defending the gays" comment.
Try to insult the winner of the argument with the idea that they are actually gay deep down.

thanks for the win.
I hope more like you discover that gays are the major problem with child molestation and that the sooner we profile, the sooner the problem can be reduced.

thanks again for admitting defeat.

If not defeat, you would have defended your post.

loser.

Wirelessly posted

Alright. Done wasting my time on you. You dragged me along this far. My bad. I'll let you get back to your gay porn now. Bye.

Oh yes, the typical "I lost the defending the gays" comment.
Try to insult the winner of the argument with the idea that they are actually gay deep down.

thanks for the win.
I hope more like you discover that gays are the major problem with child molestation and that the sooner we profile, the sooner the problem can be reduced.

thanks again for admitting defeat.

If not defeat, you would have defended your post.

loser.

You mean that move that you make at the beginning of the argument every time this topic comes up?

This has been really funny watching you spin yourself in circles.

Wirelessly posted

Alright. Done wasting my time on you. You dragged me along this far. My bad. I'll let you get back to your gay porn now. Bye.

Oh yes, the typical "I lost the defending the gays" comment.
Try to insult the winner of the argument with the idea that they are actually gay deep down.

thanks for the win.
I hope more like you discover that gays are the major problem with child molestation and that the sooner we profile, the sooner the problem can be reduced.

thanks again for admitting defeat.

If not defeat, you would have defended your post.

loser.

Here is where the other poster made you look idiotic since you obviously don't read the posts, not even the bolded parts.

* Three out of four children who were victimized were female.

The ignorance comes from someone so afraid to profile that they will continue to turn their heads.

again, you disgust me, you are the reason that so many boys are molested.
Its as if you did it yourself.


You really don't get it. YOu feel the need to turn this personal for some strange reason. I could give that a go, say something like I've seen pics of your daughter; my gaydar is ringing loud and clear with that one; hopefully your hate won't cause her years and years of therapy or getting poked with needles trying to cure herself....but I would never do that - because there is no need to be so cruel.
So instead, I'll just agree with you: You're right twatriver, If Target sells a tshirt with a rainbow on it - then thousands of little alter boys are going to be butt raped by gays - Bad Target!! They should also ban camping crap - only straight redneck guys buy that stuff and everyone knows that all the little 7 year old girls are getting boned by the straight rednecks that camp. Its true because I say it is.

So instead, I'll just agree with you: You're right twatriver, If Target sells a tshirt with a rainbow on it - then thousands of little alter boys are going to be butt raped by gays - Bad Target!!




I never said that, I merely stated if Target Chose to Support the Gay Lifestyle selling 'Pride' T-Shirts, I was going to shop else where .............


and I do not see where BCP said anything of the kind - Project Much do you ...


all he stated is molesters of little boys, were Homos .......... nothing about target

You really don't get it. YOu feel the need to turn this personal for some strange reason. I could give that a go, say something like I've seen pics of your daughter; my gaydar is ringing loud and clear with that one; hopefully your hate won't cause her years and years of therapy or getting poked with needles trying to cure herself....but I would never do that - because there is no need to be so cruel.
So instead, I'll just agree with you: You're right twatriver, If Target sells a tshirt with a rainbow on it - then thousands of little alter boys are going to be butt raped by gays - Bad Target!! They should also ban camping crap - only straight redneck guys buy that stuff and everyone knows that all the little 7 year old girls are getting boned by the straight rednecks that camp. Its true because I say it is.

if your gaydar is ringing loud and clear looking at pictures of children, I might have to think you have some pervert tendencies, Could be why you try to defend child molesters and hide the reality of it.
oh, and you make comments about peoples children, but Im the one that is ignorant?
And yet another POS liberal exposes themselves for all to see.

I never said that, I merely stated if Target Chose to Support the Gay Lifestyle selling 'Pride' T-Shirts, I was going to shop else where .............


and I do not see where BCP said anything of the kind - Project Much do you ...


all he stated is molesters of little boys, were Homos .......... nothing about target


I'm sorry...who are you? I don't think I was talking to you. buh bye :howdy:

if your gaydar is ringing loud and clear looking at pictures of children, I might have to think you have some pervert tendencies, Could be why you try to defend child molesters and hide the reality of it.
oh, and you make comments about peoples children, but Im the one that is ignorant?
And yet another POS liberal exposes themselves for all to see.


But I said if I was cruel, thats what I'd say. But I'm not. Dur. Read much? I was agreeing with you and you're still so angry. Tsk tsk. Try this, it will help calm you down. Take a deep breath........close your eyes........then go #### yourself.

I'm sorry...who are you? I don't think I was talking to you. buh bye :howdy:



sure hide your head in the sand ..........

But I said if I was cruel, thats what I'd say. But I'm not. Dur. Read much? I was agreeing with you and you're still so angry. Tsk tsk. Try this, it will help calm you down. Take a deep breath........close your eyes........then go #### yourself.

oh, I see,
and once again, the typical liberal, has their obvious flaws pointed out and the only response is a weak attempt at back peddling and then swearing.

And you still don't have the capacity to understand that if a ped molests someone of the same sex, they are homopeds

I never said that, I merely stated if Target Chose to Support the Gay Lifestyle selling 'Pride' T-Shirts, I was going to shop else where .............


and I do not see where BCP said anything of the kind - Project Much do you ...


all he stated is molesters of little boys, were Homos .......... nothing about target

To be more accurate they are pedophiles. There is a difference. I wish this discussion could happen without all the divisiveness. If anyone knows anything about homosexuality, you know that MOST are caring, law-abiding people that have no interest in anything other than living their lives freely like anyone else.

I have a cousin who is gay. I love and care about her very deeply. She has a very kind and gentle heart. She and her ‘partner’ attempted to adopt two kids from Africa. Things didn’t work out for various reasons having nothing to do with their lifestyle. They have since adopted a child from another family member who is NOT GAY who literally has had 2 kids and abandoned both. My cousin is raising this child with love and care that he would NOT have gotten from his neglectful heterosexual parents. This child lives in a loving home and will likely grow up to be a perfectly normal part of society. The alternative would have likely heeded disastrous results.

I think it’s unfair to paintbrush any group as something simply because there are a few that are problems in our society. With this example I think I’ve demonstrated that there are horrible people from every sect of our society; and there are wonderful people. Gays, by and large, do not fit this narrow corridor of sin being portrayed. Although I disagree with their lifestyle, we live in a free society. If you honor this freedom then you must honor their choice to live any way they want so long as they aren’t harming anyone.

Question for any of you… If you saw an accident and someone needed CPR, and you knew they were gay, would you refuse to render CPR? If they were trapped in a house fire, would you refuse to try to rescue them simply because they are gay?

oh, I see,
and once again, the typical liberal, has their obvious flaws pointed out and the only response is a weak attempt at back peddling and then swearing.

And you still don't have the capacity to understand that if a ped molests someone of the same sex, they are homopeds

Let me try this again BCP (in a nice fashion to see if you can respond in the same) - your belief is that all gays molest children. That all of the little boys that are molested are by gays, so therefore all gays are child molesters. If one does not profile all gay men as child molesters (not sure where the gay women belong in this theory yet since the majority of children molested are girls - yet the majority of the molesters are male), then they are just as guilty of child molestation as the one commiting the act. This theory does not sound crazy to you in the least. This is fact in your opinion.

for the present discussion, the important point that I'm trying to make is that many child molesters cannot be meaningfully described as homosexuals, heterosexuals, or bisexuals (in the usual sense of those terms) because they are not really capable of a relationship with an adult man or woman. Instead of gender, their sexual attractions are based primarily on age. These individuals are attracted to all children, not to men or women. Using your argument that all boys are molested by gays, can easily be turned. The majority of children molested are girls - by males. Thus, I should be able to conclude that all straight men molest girls. Obviously even more so then gay males. If you don't agree with that then you must be protecting the molesters. See how silly that sounds? You have straight, gay, bi, AND molesters/pedeofiles. They stand in their own group alone, and no single group should be guilty by association.

There are plenty of studies and research out there proving that being gay does not mean you're a child molester. I have yet to find a study proving other. If you can point me in the right direction I'll glady read it.

Question for any of you… If you saw an accident and someone needed CPR, and you knew they were gay, would you refuse to render CPR? If they were trapped in a house fire, would you refuse to try to rescue them simply because they are gay?

Or better yet, would they want a gay person saving their life in such a situation.

Let me try this again BCP (in a nice fashion to see if you can respond in the same) - your belief is that all gays molest children. That all of the little boys that are molested are by gays, so therefore all gays are child molesters. If one does not profile all gay men as child molesters (not sure where the gay women belong in this theory yet since the majority of children molested are girls - yet the majority of the molesters are male), then they are just as guilty of child molestation as the one commiting the act. This theory does not sound crazy to you in the least. This is fact in your opinion.

.

I see the problem now, you have no ability to comprehend what you read.
never did I say that ALL gays were child molesters. Please point out where I did.
the theory that child molestation has nothing to do with sexual preference is only a ploy to take the gay angle out of the equation.
Your first example, the majority of boys that are molested are in fact molested by men, these men would be gay.
Next, most girls that are molested are molested by men, these men would be straight.
And as for profiling, it is pretty easy to see that society already does this when it comes to adults and children, males gay or straight are generally not as trusted around children as would be a woman.

So, if you had a gay that wanted to be a scout leader or a priest or anything else that puts him around male children, then yes I would see reason to keep a closer watch on him than I would a known straight male.

The same that goes for a male that tries to be a girl scout leader, or any other postion that puts him around groups of girls, I would certainly think that he should be kept a close watch on too.

But ALL gays are molesters? those are your words, not mine. Is there something you are actually thinking that you would like to share with the class?

A person reveals his character by nothing so clearly as the joke he resents.
~ Georg Christoph Lichtenberg

A person reveals his character by nothing so clearly as the joke he resents.
~ Georg Christoph Lichtenberg

I resent that. :mad:

I resent that. :mad:

You are such a character

You are such a character

Probably most resembling Charlie Brown.

Probably most resembling Charlie Brown.

Is there some hidden joke in there that I should be offended by?

Is there some hidden joke in there that I should be offended by?

Nope.

I will shop where the quality and price are good. Target is not really competitive store so I don't shop there often anyway. Gay issues wouldn't stop me from going there or anywhere for that matter. Just like picking a Dr. I compare, homework is a good thing, then pick.

Ms. Gray area here again with her dominoes. If every homophobic stops shopping there, profits go down, jobs are cut people fight to keep food on the table and a roof overhead. The majority of these employees are not gay. Please before you make a decision that could cripple our economy a bit more than it already is, think 'Is it worth hurting the innocents in this?'

:coffee:

Please before you make a decision that could cripple our economy a bit more than it already is, think 'Is it worth hurting the innocents in this?'

:coffee:



I'll repeat myself, Would you feel the same way, if Target started Selling


I am proud of ....

Al Quedia or Taliban,
the KKK,
New Black Panther Party,
Aryan Nation,
MS-13,
La Raze [racist Mexican Organization]
Bloods and Crips
Aryan Nation
Code Pink
SEIU

'Is it worth hurting the innocents in this?'

:coffee:



so I should support an Immoral Lifestyle because someone has a job a Target, do you feel the same way about prostitutes working in Nevada ........

I'll repeat myself, Would you feel the same way, if Target started Selling


I am proud of ....

Al Quedia or Taliban,
the KKK,
New Black Panther Party,
Aryan Nation,
MS-13,
La Raze [racist Mexican Organization]
Bloods and Crips
Aryan Nation
Code Pink
SEIU


I don't feel the same way about gays as I do about these you listed. Sorry. Apples and oranges IMHO

Don't think Target would sell them either, that's more a private T-company type venture.

:coffee:

I don't feel the same way about gays as I do about these you listed.

Sorry. Apples and oranges IMHO




All those groups that band together for common reasons ....

.... as does the LGBT Brigade .....


but the issue is not HOW one feels [your a liberal aren't you], but was it morally correct .....

.... men having sex with other men is not natural ....... the parts don't match

just like people hoping from bed to bed fornicating is not morally correct - plenty of people want to have sex, so they turn a blind eye

or ignore what is in their heart ........

Anyone have a classic Engine they like


I was always a fan of anything with a big block ......... nothing says POWER like a big block, and there have been none bigger than the Ford GAA

bigger that 2 460's with cubic inches left over for a couple pinto motors ....

5.4 Bore x 6 Stroke = 1100 Cubic Inches

I don't feel the same way about gays as I do about these you listed. Sorry. Apples and oranges IMHO

Don't think Target would sell them either, that's more a private T-company type venture.

:coffee:

isnt funny how bigots try to equate people standing uop for their rights like LGBT with hate groups, terrorists and gangs?
really shows how idiotic some people are. :whistle:

I'll repeat myself, Would you feel the same way, if Target started Selling


I am proud of ....

Al Quedia or Taliban,
the KKK,
New Black Panther Party,
Aryan Nation,
MS-13,
La Raze [racist Mexican Organization]
Bloods and Crips
Aryan Nation
Code Pink
SEIU

It's just a T-Shirt.

Is there a sign that says, each person entering the store must buy a T-shirt?

so I should support an Immoral Lifestyle because someone has a job a Target, do you feel the same way about prostitutes working in Nevada ........

It's their body, not mine. I could care less what someone does hundreds of miles away, as long as it doesn't hurt me, or infringe on my rights.

If Target really wanted to do the world a favor, they'd stop selling stretch pants and booty shorts in XXL.

That's the problem. They don't.


:lol:

All those groups that band together for common reasons ....

.... as does the LGBT Brigade .....


but the issue is not HOW one feels [your a liberal aren't you], but was it morally correct .....

.... men having sex with other men is not natural ....... the parts don't match

just like people hoping from bed to bed fornicating is not morally correct - plenty of people want to have sex, so they turn a blind eye

or ignore what is in their heart ........

That's got to be one of the most ridiculous statements ever. Comparing gays to HATE and TERRORIST GROUPS???? That is such a stretch. Gays are the ones trying to overcome the hate groups. I'm not trying to kill anybody or intimidate or bully or take over the world by wearing a shirt that says "Pride" or "Love is love."

By your standards, any group coming together for any reason should be likened to your list.

Maybe we should start a new thread so that you can also diss all the t-shirts that make girls look like easy tramps (ya know, because there are lots of straight sex issues that cause FAR more problems and more burden on society... Let's preach to them instead! Oh. That's right. Being a whore, committing adultery, lusting after someone, premarital sex, baby out of wedlock, divorce... those aren't nearly as bad as 2 people loving each other.)

Let me try this again BCP (in a nice fashion to see if you can respond in the same) - your belief is that all gays molest children. That all of the little boys that are molested are by gays, so therefore all gays are child molesters. If one does not profile all gay men as child molesters (not sure where the gay women belong in this theory yet since the majority of children molested are girls - yet the majority of the molesters are male), then they are just as guilty of child molestation as the one commiting the act. This theory does not sound crazy to you in the least. This is fact in your opinion.

for the present discussion, the important point that I'm trying to make is that many child molesters cannot be meaningfully described as homosexuals, heterosexuals, or bisexuals (in the usual sense of those terms) because they are not really capable of a relationship with an adult man or woman. Instead of gender, their sexual attractions are based primarily on age. These individuals are attracted to all children, not to men or women. Using your argument that all boys are molested by gays, can easily be turned. The majority of children molested are girls - by males. Thus, I should be able to conclude that all straight men molest girls. Obviously even more so then gay males. If you don't agree with that then you must be protecting the molesters. See how silly that sounds? You have straight, gay, bi, AND molesters/pedeofiles. They stand in their own group alone, and no single group should be guilty by association.

There are plenty of studies and research out there proving that being gay does not mean you're a child molester. I have yet to find a study proving other. If you can point me in the right direction I'll glady read it.

It's pointless to argue with him, as I'm sure you've figured out. I provided statistics and he couldn't counter them (or he didn't even read what I wrote) so he just made up something.

A person reveals his character by nothing so clearly as the joke he resents.
~ Georg Christoph Lichtenberg

I like this one... By nothing do men show their character more than by the things they laugh at. -JOHANN WOLFGANG VON GOETHE

#1. Nearly all the offenders in sexual assaults reported to law enforcement were male (96%).
- Sexual Assault of Young Children as Reported to Law Enforcement, 7/00, NCJ 182990, U.S. Department of Justice

#2. U. S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics has combined a study of characteristics among those child victims of convicted sex offenders and child molesters. These statistics are based on the reports of offenders in the Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities, and include the following:

* Three out of four children who were victimized were female.
* One-third of the convicted offenders had committed a crime against their own child.
* About half of the convicted offenders had a relationship with the child, either through friends or family.
* Only one out of seven inmates reported that their child victim was a stranger.
* Four out of ten child victims suffered forcible rape or another injury from child molesters.It's pointless to argue with him, as I'm sure you've figured out. I provided statistics and he couldn't counter them (or he didn't even read what I wrote) so he just made up something.

I will give you one more chance since you were unable to answer the last time.
what do these statistics have to do with anything? other than the fact that men commit more molestations than women, your "statistics" are pretty much empty as far as this discussion goes.
But go ahead and pat yourself on your back for proving what I have said many times before.

child molesters.

I will give you one more chance since you were unable to answer the last time.
what do these statistics have to do with anything? other than the fact that men commit more molestations than women, your "statistics" are pretty much empty as far as this discussion goes.
But go ahead and pat yourself on your back for proving what I have said many times before.

I believe it's #2 where it says that 3 out of 4 victims are female. So let's see... 96% of offenders are men. 75% of victims are female. Is math a foreign language down in the holler?

I believe it's #2 where it says that 3 out of 4 victims are female. So let's see... 96% of offenders are men. 75% of victims are female. Is math a foreign language down in the holler?

and this proves that a male molesting a male is not gay how?

However if you think about it, 2% of the population is committing 25% Of the molestations, does that ring any bells in your sand covered head?

and this proves that a male molesting a male is not gay how?

However if you think about it, 2% of the population is committing 25% Of the molestations, does that ring any bells in your sand covered head?

You make it impossible to counter your arguments and now I know why. You keep changing your argument (and you intentionally provoke, but that's another story). My statistics are in response to you saying "I do notice that you did not deny the fact that the vast majority of child molestations coming up in the news have all been perpetrated by homos." I gave stats proving otherwise. I have said nothing about male molesting male not being gay. You would see it that way because you're one of those sick straight people who like to sit around thinking about two gay people having sex rather than considering the fact that they just happen to be 2 guys or 2 women who love each other. I don't sit around thinking about you and your wife and the sexual things you must do to each other. Anal sex, oral sex, and other kinds of kinkyness is present in straight marriages. I don't sit around perseverating on those ideas. I think, oh those two people must love each other... or I don't think anything because I'm too busy minding my own business. Being gay to me, yeah, the sexual stuff is part of it but it's mostly about who I am in a loving relationship with. Most child molestation cases are not because a man is wanting to have a loving relationship with a boy. It's because he's a sick sick person. Equally as sick (no more, no less) as a straight man who happens to want to molest little girls. A straight person can molest a child of the same sex as easily as a gay person. I'm pretty sure that kind of perversion (meaning child abuse) doesn't discriminate. It's about power.

Now, go ahead and continue to point out the discrepancy between the small number of gays compared to the larger percentage of male on male molestation. I can't answer that but you kind of did... "We have already learned from the homo lovers that many homos are living a lie and are marred (to a woman) with children." So it's possible that it's all in proportion... or not. There's no way to know.

. My statistics are in response to you saying "I do notice that you did not deny the fact that the vast majority of child molestations coming up in the news have all been perpetrated by homos." I gave stats proving otherwise. You did no such thing, the fact is that the majority of molestation cases on the news are male on male, this does make it gay. Try to skew the numbers however you want, but what I said is correct.




I have said nothing about male molesting male not being gay. You would see it that way because you're one of those sick straight people who like to sit around thinking about two gay people having sex rather than considering the fact that they just happen to be 2 guys or 2 women who love each other.
I would prefer not have the gay crap showered on the public 24/7, but you would rather have it right out there in public, and yet you would call people that dont agree with you sick?


I don't sit around thinking about you and your wife and the sexual things you must do to each other. Anal sex, oral sex, and other kinds of kinkyness is present in straight marriages.
Good, because my sex life is normal, healthy and legal. But for the record I have never poked my tool in anyones ass, ever. That is plain nasty and not at all natural or biologically intended.

I don't sit around perseverating on those ideas. I think, oh those two people must love each other... or I don't think anything because I'm too busy minding my own business. Being gay to me, yeah, the sexual stuff is part of it but it's mostly about who I am in a loving relationship with.
and yet, I fail to see what harm it does to you if I find homosexual sex repulsive. other than the ability to get signatures on a petition, which I did, or the right to vote should it come up on a ballot, I am in no position to deny anything.

Most child molestation cases are not because a man is wanting to have a loving relationship with a boy. It's because he's a sick sick person. Equally as sick (no more, no less) as a straight man who happens to want to molest little girls. A straight person can molest a child of the same sex as easily as a gay person. I'm pretty sure that kind of perversion (meaning child abuse) doesn't discriminate. It's about power.
at least you realize that a man that molests a little girl is straight, However I fail to see how you cannot equally see that a man that molests a boy is gay. They choose their victims. They make a decision based on preference,

Now, go ahead and continue to point out the discrepancy between the small number of gays compared to the larger percentage of male on male molestation. I can't answer that but you kind of did... "We have already learned from the homo lovers that many homos are living a lie and are marred (to a woman) with children." So it's possible that it's all in proportion... or not. There's no way to know.

Proportion or not, the majority of molestation cases in the news are homosexual.
or, looking at your own numbers, is the math too hard for you to figure out?

You did no such thing, the fact is that the majority of molestation cases on the news are male on male, this does make it gay. Try to skew the numbers however you want, but what I said is correct.

Where are YOUR stats? It's correct because you said it's correct? When did you become the authority?



I would prefer not have the gay crap showered on the public 24/7, but you would rather have it right out there in public, and yet you would call people that dont agree with you sick?

I would prefer not to have the straight crap showered on me 24/7. It's everywhere I go!! Stop playing victim... just because you don't agree with something.

Good, because my sex life is normal, healthy and legal. But for the record I have never poked my tool in anyones ass, ever. That is plain nasty and not at all natural or biologically intended.

TMI, dude. No, but seriously, it's a good thing you speak for all straight people...

and yet, I fail to see what harm it does to you if I find homosexual sex repulsive. other than the ability to get signatures on a petition, which I did, or the right to vote should it come up on a ballot, I am in no position to deny anything.


You are promoting something that is trying to oppress a group of people... something that has nothing to do with you.. because you are uncomfortable with it. How does that NOT harm me?

at least you realize that a man that molests a little girl is straight, However I fail to see how you cannot equally see that a man that molests a boy is gay. They choose their victims. They make a decision based on preference,

I'm using the simplest labels... grow up. I'm not saying they're NOT gay. I'm just saying it's stupid to make that generalization and act like this is a reason to bash gays.

Proportion or not, the majority of molestation cases in the news are homosexual.
or, looking at your own numbers, is the math too hard for you to figure out?

Again... stats??


...

96% of offenders are men.

And this is why they throw them out of the B&N :yay:

And this is why they throw them out of the B&N :yay:

Meaning....?

Why is it that all the homo and blacks threads end up with 20+ pages?

Meaning....?

It is another thread
http://forums.somd.com/news-current-events/248271-man-alone-children-s-section.html

Why is it that all the homo and blacks threads end up with 20+ pages?

We should start a black homo thread and see how far it runs. :killingme

We should start a black homo thread and see how far it runs. :killingme

We should start a black homo race with you as the prize and see how far YOU run...

Might as well add JC Penny's to your list:

Group objects to gay dads in JCPenney catalog - Bottom Line (http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/05/12070575-group-objects-to-gay-dads-in-jcpenney-catalog?lite)

An online group is criticizing JCPenney for a catalog that features a Dallas gay couple and their children....

For Mother's Day, JC Penney featured a lesbian couple in an ad.
Openly gay talk show host Ellen DeGeneres is the store's spokeswoman. One Million Moms, which the Southern Poverty Law Center deems a hate group, also launched a campaign in February asking JCPenney to drop DeGeneres as its company spokeswoman.


See this cracks me up. They just keep upping their passive resistance ad campaign almost just to piss OMM off. It makes me wish I liked JC Penny's more but I am more of a fan of Kohls.

Might as well add JC Penny's to your list:

Group objects to gay dads in JCPenney catalog - Bottom Line (http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/05/12070575-group-objects-to-gay-dads-in-jcpenney-catalog?lite)




See this cracks me up. They just keep upping their passive resistance ad campaign almost just to piss OMM off. It makes me wish I liked JC Penny's more but I am more of a fan of Kohls.

I like Kohls better as well, but I think JCP will get some $$ from me this Father's Day on principle alone. :wink:

We should start a black homo race with you as the prize and see how far YOU run...

Not exactly sure what the hell you are talking a out, (I dont speak gayanese) but, Ok.

Might as well add JC Penny's to your list:

Group objects to gay dads in JCPenney catalog - Bottom Line (http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/05/12070575-group-objects-to-gay-dads-in-jcpenney-catalog?lite)

I must be an idiot. I saw that ad - or a similar one - and it didn't register with me as gay. Two dads with their respective kids, so what? Do guys not get their kids together for playdates or something? I think most people would look at that ad clear, with no background or previous publicity, and not think a thing of it.

I must be an idiot.


You're not a homophobe. Or a race-phobe. Or a religion-phobe. The only thing you tend to reflexively recoil from is...idiots.

Unless they're entertaining you.

Good, because my sex life is normal, healthy and legal.

Doubt it...

In MD oral sex can not be given or received anywhere.

You're not a homophobe. Or a race-phobe. Or a religion-phobe. The only thing you tend to reflexively recoil from is...idiots.

Unless they're entertaining you.

Nah, pretty sure I'm just an idiot. Upon further inspection, the children are non-white in some form, which may indicate that they were adopted, and even that didn't register with me. :lol:

I really should reconsider my bigotry, though, and recoil from gays and non-whites instead of idiots - there are a lot less of them (gays and non-whites).

I must be an idiot. I saw that ad - or a similar one - and it didn't register with me as gay. Two dads with their respective kids, so what? Do guys not get their kids together for playdates or something? I think most people would look at that ad clear, with no background or previous publicity, and not think a thing of it.

Oh come on now, be real! Those dudes might was well have had their ##### out in their hands getting ready to demonstrate to their children just how normal man-man boom-boom is. If you can't see that, you're part of the problem. The radical homosexual agenda is determined to shove this #### down our throats and that ad is a perfect example of their in-your-face efforts to force their way of life on every American, starting with the kids.

Two guys with non-white tots hanging on them - okay, I can see where some might perceive that as gay. I guess. But how would you indicate that two women photographed with children were a lesbian couple?

:confused:

Nah, pretty sure I'm just an idiot. Upon further inspection, the children are non-white in some form, which may indicate that they were adopted, and even that didn't register with me. :lol: I saw that RIGHT away because I am an adopto-phobe and for good reason. One of my best friends, who was adopted, said I "looked like a Pollack" when I got my glasses in second grade. Well, this immediately crushed my feeling and I was, rightly, outraged. Then, I went and asked my mom and aunt what that meant. Ever since, I have been leery of the adopted.

I really should reconsider my bigotry, though, and recoil from gays and non-whites instead of idiots - there are a lot less of them (gays and non-whites).

And what of the entertainment factor?

Two guys with non-white tots hanging on them - okay, I can see where some might perceive that as gay. I guess. But how would you indicate that two women photographed with children were a lesbian couple?

:confused:

butch hair cuts and grandpa shoes maybe

And what of the entertainment factor?

Not to mention all that exercise I get recoiling.

I must be an idiot. I saw that ad - or a similar one - and it didn't register with me as gay. Two dads with their respective kids, so what? Do guys not get their kids together for playdates or something? I think most people would look at that ad clear, with no background or previous publicity, and not think a thing of it.

I think most people did or I thought I read that somewhere that most people did not think twice about it until the OMM made a fuss.

Good, because my sex life is normal, healthy and legal.


Is ETC a top or bottom? :coffee:

Is ETC a top or bottom? :coffee:

I suppose it depends on what is legal?

Two guys with non-white tots hanging on them - okay, I can see where some might perceive that as gay. I guess. But how would you indicate that two women photographed with children were a lesbian couple?

:confused:

I think there is a caption in the cataloge.

I think there is a caption in the cataloge.

What does it say, "Cheap gifts in case you're buying for two mommies"?

What does it say, "Cheap gifts in case you're buying for two mommies"?

:snort:
I searched and it says this at the bottom:

"Real-life dads Todd Koch and Cooper Smith with their children Claire and Mason"

"Real-life dads Todd Koch and Cooper Smith with their children Claire and Mason"

That wouldn't tell me they were dads together, only that they happen to be dads and these are their children (not necessarily their children together).

See? Told you I'm an idiot. :lol:

That wouldn't tell me they were dads together, only that they happen to be dads and these are their children (not necessarily their children together).

See? Told you I'm an idiot. :lol:

Good point. I probably would not have noticed it either. I think it goes bacl to another point I think I said (but I read it somewhere else so I cannot take credit), that most people would not have thought twice about it had OMM not pointed it out. I think the couple has since spoken out publicly so that is how it is conformed.

I must be an idiot. I saw that ad - or a similar one - and it didn't register with me as gay. Two dads with their respective kids, so what? Do guys not get their kids together for playdates or something? I think most people would look at that ad clear, with no background or previous publicity, and not think a thing of it.

I get *some* confusion when I am out and about with my daughter (who is black) and either the husband or wife of a couple we know (who have a Hispanic child and a bi-racial child).

When it's me and my friend's wife, people think we are married and all of the kids are "ours". Usually takes a minute to figure out what people are assuming.

Frankly, it never occurred to me if I was with my buddy and his kids that people might think we were gay.

I get *some* confusion when I am out and about with my daughter (who is black) and either the husband or wife of a couple we know (who have a Hispanic child and a bi-racial child).

When it's me and my friend's wife, people think we are married and all of the kids are "ours". Usually takes a minute to figure out what people are assuming.

Frankly, it never occurred to me if I was with my buddy and his kids that people might think we were gay.

You're gay? Who knew!! Good for you and your partner!! :coffee:

Oh come on now, be real! Those dudes might was well have had their ##### out in their hands getting ready to demonstrate to their children just how normal man-man boom-boom is.




Folsom Street Fair (http://www.zombietime.com/folsom_sf_2007_part_1/index.php)


The Folsom Street Fair is primarily a festival of sexual fetishes -- bondage, sado-machochism, animal fantasies, and so on -- yet the pre-eminent sexual fetish at the Folsom event is the one least discussed: exhibitionism. This man, for example, is an exhibitionist, as were a great many others at the fair. Exhibitionists derive sexual pleasure from having people watch them engage in sex. You, the observer, are a participant in their sex act, whether you want to be or not. That's the point, the source of the "thrill." If you attend the Folsom Street Fair, to a certain extent you are knowingly agreeing to be "visually raped" and to participate in the exhibitionist sex of others, just by being there to view it. Almost always, when someone at the fair began to masturbate, a crowd would form to watch: and by so doing would voluntarily become second-hand participants in the solo sex act -- just as you the viewer are doing right now.

I get *some* confusion when I am out and about with my daughter (who is black) and either the husband or wife of a couple we know (who have a Hispanic child and a bi-racial child).

When it's me and my friend's wife, people think we are married and all of the kids are "ours". Usually takes a minute to figure out what people are assuming.

Frankly, it never occurred to me if I was with my buddy and his kids that people might think we were gay.

Why would people assume you were gay because the kids looked like a cross between the two of you? Most are aware that it is physically impossible for gays to reproduce.

thus the passive recruitment they engage in with public school kids.

Folsom Street Fair (http://www.zombietime.com/folsom_sf_2007_part_1/index.php)

You should attend the Exotic Erotic Ball.

Almost always, when someone at the fair began to masturbate, a crowd would form to watch

certainly a moral act from a moral group of individuals.

Originally Posted by Hank View Post
Is ETC a top or bottom?


I suppose it depends on what is legal?



No Hank I am not interested in your Pussy ..............

And I'm more likely to go to Target just so I don't have to weed my way through all the little 6 year olds and their fat girlscout mommas along with the kung fu class car wash just to buy some shampoo. No I don't want your friggen donuts and no I don't have any old eyeglasses to give your old a$$. Just let me go in the friggen store. :cds:

and this I can respect completely. you see all of that as a bother & a hassle to you & what you are trying to get done with your time out. Me, I'm more than willing to give to certain charitable organizations at my own free will. It makes me feel good about doing what is right & responsible as a Christian

I prefer it like this as opposed to my government stealing it from me then giving it to something I strongly oppose in the false disguise of "fairness"

You should attend the Exotic Erotic Ball.



only if there are LOTS of undressed Women .............. I don't want to see no Penis

only if there are LOTS of undressed Women .............. I don't want to see no Penis
So I guess that means you don't watch porn huh?


Bummer

Folsom Street Fair (http://www.zombietime.com/folsom_sf_2007_part_1/index.php)

Pretty simple test. Look at all the pics and you'll either be aroused or disinterested or laugh or what ever. The only arousal I felt was when I finally got to the chick in the red corset. Her website is even better. Way better.

As for all the gay gays, and their gay ways, I can't help but laugh and wonder what it is women see in men because we are just laughably hideous and comically absurd. That's how I know I am not gay. Just never been attracted to males or gay sex. Ugh. And that's how simple this whole thing is; had those been all women, then you know what gay men see in one another.

:shrug:

Were you this against Interracial marriage?

Because if you were look how silly that was now.

Barack Hussein Obama...need I say any more? Didn't 2 black men end up dumping her?

Pretty simple test. Look at all the pics and you'll either be aroused or disinterested or laugh or what ever.

:shrug:



:barf:

...... NO Body should be having sex, parading around in Public naked ......

If the contained themselves to private parties, kept it the bed room fine, it this IN YOUR FACE Militancy that is so revolting .......... too guys want to live together and suck each other off fine, I am not worrying what 2 dudes are doing alone .....

that woman in Manhattan walking around topless .......

.... walking around with your tits hanging out in NOT Free Speech ..........

:evil:

I am not sure which came 1st ......... but;


Folsom St Fair
Slut Walk (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SlutWalk)

a world wide GO Topless DAY (http://gotopless.org/) .....

..... woman everywhere want the right to walk around in public like African pygmies from Nat Geo in the 1930's ..... the chick in the website is cute .... but if you have ever seen a news report ........ man cows that should keep covered up ....


Topless Protest by Breasts Not Bombs and Code Pink at Hillary Clinton Campaign Launch Party (http://www.zombietime.com/hillary_sf_office_topless_protest/)


Breasts Not Bombs, Berkeley, July 23, 2005 (http://www.zombietime.com/breasts_not_bombs/)




going the way of Ol' Rome ............ Immoral to the end

you know a poster has absolutely nothing to add when they start with correcting puncuation and spelling.

why dont you express your "opion" on the topic at hand instead of just being a douche?

so says the king of all douchies...

You would compare those? While Cancer can kill you....

being gay does not.

And don't you dare use AIDs because straight people have and get AIDs

If this is true, then I know some gay bashers that need to appeal their convictions. Apparently those fags didn't die from the boots upside their head. It was something else that killed em.

And i'll take your dare...Str8 people got AIDS...FROM PEOPLE THAT SCREWED QUEERS!!

:barf:

...... NO Body should be having sex, parading around in Public naked ......

I d

It's San Francisco. It's what they do. :shrug:

I just find it to be beyond funny when people shout for boycotting some place that shows support for something.



Like when the gay liberals wanted everybody to boycott chick fil a for donating a bunch of food to a christian fundamentalist group simply outta goodwill?...Like they did for a gay rights group just a month prior?

:barf:

...... NO Body should be having sex, parading around in Public naked ......

If the contained themselves to private parties, kept it the bed room fine, it this IN YOUR FACE Militancy that is so revolting .......... too guys want to live together and suck each other off fine, I am not worrying what 2 dudes are doing alone .....

that woman in Manhattan walking around topless .......

.... walking around with your tits hanging out in NOT Free Speech ..........

:evil:

I am not sure which came 1st ......... but;


Folsom St Fair
Slut Walk (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SlutWalk)

a world wide GO Topless DAY (http://gotopless.org/) .....

..... woman everywhere want the right to walk around in public like African pygmies from Nat Geo in the 1930's ..... the chick in the website is cute .... but if you have ever seen a news report ........ man cows that should keep covered up ....


Topless Protest by Breasts Not Bombs and Code Pink at Hillary Clinton Campaign Launch Party (http://www.zombietime.com/hillary_sf_office_topless_protest/)


Breasts Not Bombs, Berkeley, July 23, 2005 (http://www.zombietime.com/breasts_not_bombs/)




going the way of Ol' Rome ............ Immoral to the end

There's a worldwide topless day?! Sweet!!

No Hank I am not interested in your Pussy ..............

Surprise, Surprise......:killingme