BOP
06-09-2012, 08:37 AM
I'm detecting a pattern here (which would be a deliberate understatement):
Michelle Malkin » Say it ain’t so: Nancy Pelosi’s female staffers paid less than men? (http://michellemalkin.com/2012/06/03/nancy-pelosi-5/)
According to publicly available salary data at the website Legistorm, Pelosi’s female employees earned an average annual salary of $96,394 in fiscal year 2011. Male employees earned $123,000 on average, a difference of 27.6 percent.
The gap is even larger if calculated using the median salaries for men and women. For Pelosi’s female employees, the median annual salary was $93,320 in 2011, compared to $130,455 for male employees—a difference of $37,135, or 40 percent.
Pelosi’s entire staff—men and women—earned an average annual salary of $108,150 and a median salary of $114,662. By both measures, women made considerably less.
Let's see...where have we seen that before? :whistle:
Michelle Malkin » Say it ain’t so: Nancy Pelosi’s female staffers paid less than men? (http://michellemalkin.com/2012/06/03/nancy-pelosi-5/)
According to publicly available salary data at the website Legistorm, Pelosi’s female employees earned an average annual salary of $96,394 in fiscal year 2011. Male employees earned $123,000 on average, a difference of 27.6 percent.
The gap is even larger if calculated using the median salaries for men and women. For Pelosi’s female employees, the median annual salary was $93,320 in 2011, compared to $130,455 for male employees—a difference of $37,135, or 40 percent.
Pelosi’s entire staff—men and women—earned an average annual salary of $108,150 and a median salary of $114,662. By both measures, women made considerably less.
Let's see...where have we seen that before? :whistle: