Unemployment Rate Dropped In Every State That Elected A Republican Gov. In 2010 (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/07/Unemployment-Rate-Dropped-In-Every-State-That-Elected-A-Republican-Gov-In-2010)


In 2010, influenced by the Tea Party and its focus on fiscal issues, 17 states elected Republican governors. And, according to an Examiner.com analysis, every one of those states saw a drop in their unemployment rates since January of 2011. Furthermore, the average drop in the unemployment rate in these states was 1.35%, compared to the national decline of .9%, which means, according to the analysis, that the job market in these Republican states is improving 50% faster than the national rate.

Since January of 2011, here is how much the unemployment rate declined in each of the 17 states that elected Republican governors in 2010, according to the Examiner:

Kansas - 6.9% to 6.1% = a decline of 0.8%

Maine - 8.0% to 7.4% = a decline of 0.6%

Michigan - 10.9% to 8.5% = a decline of 2.4%

New Mexico - 7.7% to 6.7% = a decline of 1.0%

Oklahoma - 6.2% to 4.8% = a decline of 1.4%

Pennsylvania - 8.0% to 7.4% = a decline of 0.6%

Tennessee - 9.5% to 7.9% = a decline of 1.6%

Wisconsin - 7.7% to 6.8% = a decline of 0.9%

Wyoming - 6.3% to 5.2% = a decline of 1.1%

Alabama - 9.3% to 7.4% = a decline of 1.9%

Georgia - 10.1% to 8.9% = a decline of 1.2%

South Carolina - 10.6% to 9.1% = a decline of 1.5%

South Dakota - 5.0% to 4.3% = a decline of 0.7%

Florida - 10.9% to 8.6% = a decline of 2.3%

Nevada - 13.8% to 11.6% = a decline of 2.2%

Iowa - 6.1% to 5.1% = a decline of 1.0%

Ohio - 9.0% to 7.3% = a decline of 1.7%

On the other hand, the unemployment rate in states that elected Democrats in 2010 dropped, on average, as much as the national rate decline and, in some states such as New York, the unemployment rate has risen since January of 2011.

This is yet another example of how the so-called “blue state” model is not working.

Unemployment Rate Dropped In Every State That Elected A Republican Gov. In 2010 (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/07/Unemployment-Rate-Dropped-In-Every-State-That-Elected-A-Republican-Gov-In-2010).

This is yet another example of how the so-called “blue state” model is not working.



....so how is the fat man in NJ,how is the unempoyment in his state?

....so how is the fat man in NJ,how is the unempoyment in his state?

Since you're making a personal attack against someone instead of arguing the benefits of your economic policy, you must be a progressive

Since you're making a personal attack against someone instead of arguing the benefits of your economic policy, you must be a progressive
He's a GIANT ONE...

Since you're making a personal attack against someone instead of arguing the benefits of your economic policy, you must be a progressive


LOL......no answer,knew it.:coffee:

He's a GIANT ONE...


........took you a while to think of that one,good for you.:whistle:

I would argue Christie is NOT a Conservative ........ Moderate yes, making Conservative Style Financial Choices yep


Unemployment in the U.S. - Google Public Data Explorer (http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=z1ebjpgk2654c1_&met_y=unemployment_rate&idim=state:ST340000&fdim_y=seasonality:S&dl=en&hl=en&q=nj+unemployment#!ctype=l&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=h&met_y=unemployment_rate&fdim_y=seasonality:S&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=country&idim=state:ST340000&ifdim=country&tstart=1263013200000&tend=1336536000000&hl=en_US&dl=en&ind=false)


Looks like it has gone down a 1/2 a % ...... certainly with in a margin of error

I would argue Christie is NOT a Conservative ........ Moderate yes, making Conservative Style Financial Choices yep


Unemployment in the U.S. - Google Public Data Explorer (http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=z1ebjpgk2654c1_&met_y=unemployment_rate&idim=state:ST340000&fdim_y=seasonality:S&dl=en&hl=en&q=nj+unemployment#!ctype=l&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=h&met_y=unemployment_rate&fdim_y=seasonality:S&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=country&idim=state:ST340000&ifdim=country&tstart=1263013200000&tend=1336536000000&hl=en_US&dl=en&ind=false)


Looks like it has gone down a 1/2 a % ...... certainly with in a margin of error
Why would you change the criteria for him from Republican / Democrat governor, to Progressive / Conservative?

....so how is the fat man in NJ,how is the unempoyment in his state?


January 2010, New Jersey's unemployment rate was at 9.7% and now at 9.2%. Still seems high but who are kidding New Jersey is a blue state with a moderate Republican in charge.

For the record Chris Christie along with Bob McDonnell were elected in 2009.

January 2010, New Jersey's unemployment rate was at 9.7% and now at 9.2%. Still seems high but who are kidding New Jersey is a blue state with a moderate Republican in charge.

For the record Chris Christie along with Bob McDonnell were elected in 2009.

...he let C&S come in a close 5 warehouse's for A+P and outsource the work ,now he is going after every public Union in the state....BS it's at around 10%:whistle:

... ,now he is going after every public Union in the state....BS it's at around 10%:whistle:

:yay: good for him

Public service unions are a just a money laundering scheme for the democrats.


They should make union dues voluntary or have a national right to work law.

...he let C&S come in a close 5 warehouse's for A+P and outsource the work ,now he is going after every public Union in the state....BS it's at around 10%:whistle:

So you ask, and it gets answered, you ignore it because it is not what you wanted to hear. Are you stupid?

Never mind, I know the answer to that. :killingme

Never mind, I know the answer to that. :killingme


....coming from you ,I doubt it,alot.:whistle:

:yay: good for him

Public service unions are a just a money laundering scheme for the democrats.


.

...any links or facts to back that up?

NJ unemployment doubled between 2008-10. Christie inherited a mess (sound familiar).

...any links or facts to back that up?

nea, seiu, uaw

NJ unemployment doubled between 2008-10. Christie inherited a mess (sound familiar).

...and most of it came in 2010 and 2011 under the fat man himself.

nea, seiu, uaw




.....try again , any links to back up your ignorance?

.....try again , any links to back up your ignorance?

No offense, but I have yet to see you provide links to back up your rhetoric in any thread you've been called out on.

Unemployment Rate Dropped In Every State That Elected A Republican Gov. In 2010 (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/07/Unemployment-Rate-Dropped-In-Every-State-That-Elected-A-Republican-Gov-In-2010)


In 2010, influenced by the Tea Party and its focus on fiscal issues, 17 states elected Republican governors. And, according to an Examiner.com analysis, every one of those states saw a drop in their unemployment rates since January of 2011. Furthermore, the average drop in the unemployment rate in these states was 1.35%, compared to the national decline of .9%, which means, according to the analysis, that the job market in these Republican states is improving 50% faster than the national rate.

Since January of 2011, here is how much the unemployment rate declined in each of the 17 states that elected Republican governors in 2010, according to the Examiner:

Kansas - 6.9% to 6.1% = a decline of 0.8%

Maine - 8.0% to 7.4% = a decline of 0.6%

Michigan - 10.9% to 8.5% = a decline of 2.4%

New Mexico - 7.7% to 6.7% = a decline of 1.0%

Oklahoma - 6.2% to 4.8% = a decline of 1.4%

Pennsylvania - 8.0% to 7.4% = a decline of 0.6%

Tennessee - 9.5% to 7.9% = a decline of 1.6%

Wisconsin - 7.7% to 6.8% = a decline of 0.9%

Wyoming - 6.3% to 5.2% = a decline of 1.1%

Alabama - 9.3% to 7.4% = a decline of 1.9%

Georgia - 10.1% to 8.9% = a decline of 1.2%

South Carolina - 10.6% to 9.1% = a decline of 1.5%

South Dakota - 5.0% to 4.3% = a decline of 0.7%

Florida - 10.9% to 8.6% = a decline of 2.3%

Nevada - 13.8% to 11.6% = a decline of 2.2%

Iowa - 6.1% to 5.1% = a decline of 1.0%

Ohio - 9.0% to 7.3% = a decline of 1.7%

On the other hand, the unemployment rate in states that elected Democrats in 2010 dropped, on average, as much as the national rate decline and, in some states such as New York, the unemployment rate has risen since January of 2011.

This is yet another example of how the so-called “blue state” model is not working.

It could be argued that a few of those states have declined because of the automotive sector rebounding and that the election of a Republican Govenor only gives the illusion that the Republican Governor is responsible. Just like the dotcom boom happening under Clinton gave the illusion that Clinton created a great economy.

And a few of those states, Florida most notably, have had Republican govenors for years.

...and most of it came in 2010 and 2011 under the fat man himself.

Actually Christie was elected in November of 2009 and took office in 2010..

The unemployment for the state of NJ peaked BEFORE he took office, and plateued when he entered office (Unemployment STOPPED it's meteoric climb). Unemployment rate was at 9.7% when he was elected in Nov 2009, and has not exceeded 9.7% since his election.

Today the unemployment rolls are at their lowest levels since 2008...


What were you saying again??

:yay: good for him

Public service unions are a just a money laundering scheme for the democrats.


They should make union dues voluntary or have a national right to work law.

...any links or facts to back that up?

Declaration of Independence - Text Transcript (http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html)

It could be argued that a few of those states have declined because of the automotive sector rebounding and that the election of a Republican Govenor only gives the illusion that the Republican Governor is responsible. Just like the dotcom boom happening under Clinton gave the illusion that Clinton created a great economy.

And a few of those states, Florida most notably, have had Republican govenors for years.


So, in Republican states that are doing well, Bozo is the reason, and in Repulican states that are still messed up (Louisiana for example), the Gov is the reason? Typical logic for a Bozologist.

It could be argued that a few of those states have declined because of the automotive sector rebounding and that the election of a Republican Govenor only gives the illusion that the Republican Governor is responsible. Just like the dotcom boom happening under Clinton gave the illusion that Clinton created a great economy.

And a few of those states, Florida most notably, have had Republican govenors for years.

You mean like South Carolina??

Where Boeing is moving, even though the democrats tried to block it?

Or where Hyundai, Kia, and BMW plants are... Thank God for those BAILOUTS!!


Yep, the bailouts sure helped there..

Of course SC unemployment would be a lot less if it wasn't for the democrats blocking companies from moving there ... to support their Union thu.. I mean friends..

Actually Christie was elected in November of 2009 and took office in 2010..

The unemployment for the state of NJ peaked BEFORE he took office, and plateued when he entered office (Unemployment STOPPED it's meteoric climb). Unemployment rate was at 9.7% when he was elected in Nov 2009, and has not exceeded 9.7% since his election.

Today the unemployment rolls are at their lowest levels since 2008...


What were you saying again??

LOL...unempoyment is at it's highest the amount of people getting unemployment benifits is what has dropped...a difference a smart guy like you already knew(wink,wink).

From a recent trough of 411,906 in January 2012, the number of unemployed has now grown by 11,030. New Jersey job growth data is also available.

LOL...unempoyment is at it's highest the amount of people getting unemployment benifits is what has dropped...a difference a smart guy like you already knew(wink,wink).

From a recent trough of 411,906 in January 2012, the number of unemployed has now grown by 11,030. New Jersey job growth data is also available.

Actually I mentioned the number on the rolls, but the unemployment rate is what it is, and what it is is lower than when he took office.

It was 9.7% when he took office and has never been higher than 9.7% since he took office. It's not a huge improvement but it is an improvement, despite what you're trying to make us believe.

Actually I mentioned the number on the rolls, but the unemployment rate is what it is, and what it is is lower than when he took office.

It was 9.7% when he took office and has never been higher than 9.7% since he took office. It's not a huge improvement but it is an improvement, despite what you're trying to make us believe.


Oh so my facts against your fiction,cool ,just so I know.:coffee:

Oh so my facts against your fiction,cool ,just so I know.:coffee:

Unemployment in the U.S. - Google Public Data Explorer (http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=z1ebjpgk2654c1_&met_y=unemployment_rate&idim=state:ST340000&fdim_y=seasonality:S&dl=en&hl=en&q=new+jersey+unemployment+rate)

Unemployment in the U.S. - Google Public Data Explorer (http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=z1ebjpgk2654c1_&met_y=unemployment_rate&idim=state:ST340000&fdim_y=seasonality:S&dl=en&hl=en&q=new+jersey+unemployment+rate)


..so my numbers aren't wrong,thanks.:killingme

...he let C&S come in a close 5 warehouse's for A+P and outsource the work ,now he is going after every public Union in the state....BS it's at around 10%:whistle:

Linky for the 10% factoid, or just another dingleberry you pulled outta ur butt?

Your own link shows a 9.2% unemployment rate, which contradicts your 10% claim. And the unemployment rate has dropped since 2010 (gosh, imagine that!)

Here's another: PolitiFact New Jersey | New Jersey (http://www.politifact.com/new-jersey/statements/2012/jun/27/paul-sarlo/new-jerseys-unemployment-rate-5th-highest-nation-s/)

Get out of the basement and ask your mommy for a peanut butter and jelly sandwich and leave serious discussions for those of us that put on big boy pants.

It could be argued that a few of those states have declined because of the automotive sector rebounding and that the election of a Republican Govenor only gives the illusion that the Republican Governor is responsible. Just like the dotcom boom happening under Clinton gave the illusion that Clinton created a great economy.

And a few of those states, Florida most notably, have had Republican govenors for years.

Yes, it could be argued, but not very successfully with a fully informed electorate.

So, in Republican states that are doing well, Bozo is the reason, and in Repulican states that are still messed up (Louisiana for example), the Gov is the reason? Typical logic for a Bozologist.

That's not what I said. I said, in some states (Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania most notably), the turnaround can be credited in large part to the automobile industry turning around. So, it really wouldn't have mattered who was Governor. Kind of like Clinton being in office during the dotcom boom -- he got the credit and the glory but it wasn't entirely because of his policies.

And other states on that list (such as Florida) have had Republican governors for years. I'm not disputing their numbers, but ththe article makes it look like the states, like Florida, ousted a Democrat and put in a Republican and it magically fixed the economy when they've had Republican governors for years.

And I'm not an Obama supporter. I just don't like Willard Romney.