what is she suddenly back on the ticket ......... the left seems to be ramping up attacks on her again


she must be on to something for Nhboy to posting so much spin



[you know you are doing a good job when your enemies start attacking you]

what is she suddenly back on the ticket ......... the left seems to be ramping up attacks on her again


she must be on to something for Nhboy to posting so much spin



[you know you are doing a good job when your enemies start attacking you]

I would fall over if she was picked. No way I can see that. However, it does make one wonder; is the GOP simply saying "Hey, Michelle. We need Mitt to look all moderate and stuff so, go out there and get in trouble so the extreme label doesn't fit Mitt at all."

I would fall over if she was picked. No way I can see that. However, it does make one wonder; is the GOP simply saying "Hey, Michelle. We need Mitt to look all moderate and stuff so, go out there and get in trouble so the extreme label doesn't fit Mitt at all."




I was making ref to the silly campaign season, past ........ some 'rises to the top' .... they become the :cds: left screeching target of the week

oh and Mitt and Extreme do not belong in the same sentence

with all the denile and :cds: from the left, parroted by progressives on this board, you have to wonder in Michelle ain't on to something

I would fall over if she was picked. No way I can see that. However, it does make one wonder; is the GOP simply saying "Hey, Michelle. We need Mitt to look all moderate and stuff so, go out there and get in trouble so the extreme label doesn't fit Mitt at all."

Since anything Tea Party/Republican (even RHINOs) are labelled "extreme" by the news media, your analysis is probably right on the money. I may disagree with the 'get into trouble' part as all she has to do is open her mouth and libs are gonna jump her butt (figuratively of course).

with all the denile and :cds: from the left, parroted by progressives on this board, you have to wonder in Michelle ain't on something

Remove 'to' and it all comes into focus. :lol:

What could she possibly be on to? I mean, seriously. If you simply take the results of US foreign policy before she and Hillary 'took over' the State Department, how could we possibly quantify the results under them as worse? That we suddenly had to bungled wars? That US troops were dying for no good results? That we were pissing away trillions of dollars??? That the East was winning? At best, it's a low brow distraction away from our previous failures. At worst, if she is some sort of Puppet Master dirty dealing the US, how could we even tell compared to what we have had going on?

Oh, what the hell. Apparently, she raises a lot of money every time she does something like this. Follow the dough. Probably just that simple.

:shrug:

it if is 'much a do, about nothing'


then why give the accusations your time and energy .......

the topic could have quietly circulated in the conservative blogosphere, and been the end of the matter ......

Paranoid Fantasy for a moment:

Moslems want to take over ........ Hillary, influenced by Moslem Sisterhood member to push harder for UN Small Arms treaty - limiting American ability to own, purchase, sell Pistols and Rifles ....... over time Islamist's build up in this country [decades even] - all the while US Gun Ownership dwindles due to UN Interference - hell maybe we even have blue helmet raids on peaceful citizens confiscating weapons, and dragging people off to jail - the Islamist make their move after reaching critical mass, America basically falls to islam without to much fuss because no one has weapons to fight the changes





I should write fiction ...........