Again, with de-institutionalization, project housing, welfare programs, it appears that Democrats just want to keep poor and blacks so dysfunctional that they can't better themselves. Taxing the rich is not going to solve the inner city problems.

Newsflash, dude - neither do the Republicans.

Newsflash, dude - neither do the Republicans.

Yea, but the Republicans don't make it worst for the poor either. Can you say Detroit! Can you say Cabrini–Green in Chicago that averaged a murder a day.

Why They Built the Pruitt-Igoe Project

St. Louis's Pruitt-Igoe housing project is arguably the most infamous public housing project ever built in the United States. A product of the postwar federal public-housing program, this mammoth high-rise development was completed in 1956.

Only a few years later, disrepair, vandalism, and crime plagued Pruitt-Igoe. The project's recreational galleries and skip-stop elevators, once heralded as architectural innovations, had become nuisances and danger zones. Large numbers of vacancies indicated that even poor people preferred to live anywhere but Pruitt-Igoe. In 1972, after spending more than $5 million in vain to cure the problems at Pruitt-Igoe, the St. Louis Housing Authority, in a highly publicized event, demolished three of the high-rise buildings. A year later, in concert with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, it declared Pruitt-Igoe unsalvageable and razed the remaining buildings.

Pruitt-Igoe has lived on symbolically as an icon of failure. Liberals perceive it as exemplifying the government's appalling treatment of the poor. Architectural critics cite it as proof of the failure of high-rise public housing for families with children. One critic even asserted that its destruction signaled the end of the modern style of architecture.

Pruitt-Igoe Housing Project (http://www.soc.iastate.edu/sapp/PruittIgoe.html)

Can you say Union!


1hhJ_49leBw

Again, with de-institutionalization, project housing, welfare programs, it appears that Democrats just want to keep poor and blacks so dysfunctional that they can't better themselves.


It seems a bit peculiar to differentiate the "poor and blacks" as in the poor white folk and all black people are thereby equal, and of course "dysfunctional" too per Joe Rider.

If you were not so dirty racist then you might then see why the Democratic Party is offering a better world, while the Republicans are pushing for more unjust supremacy over the American people.



Taxing the rich is not going to solve the inner city problems.


Nobody (except JoeRider) as in no Democrat claims that taxing the rich is intended to solve inner city problems.

The reason for taxing the rich is to make the taxing more fair and equitable, also it is meant to decrease the National debt and the budget over spending, and it is wanted to make right the never ending legacy of the Bush era tax breaks for the very rich and the out of control spending by the last Bush administration.

You (JoeRider) are the one trying to twist the reasoning into your own perverted idea, as shown in the quoted words above.



Why They Built the Pruitt-Igoe Project

St. Louis's Pruitt-Igoe housing project is arguably the most infamous public housing project ever built in the United States. A product of the postwar federal public-housing program, this mammoth high-rise development was completed in 1956.


That is referring to a housing project of 55 years ago, and it was built during the "Jim Crow (http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/what.htm)" years too.

And I do not see how you can say "they" the Democrats built it since it was planned and built over many years, and it was an attempt to corral the black people so there is little doubt as to why they trashed it.

Also 1956 was the re-election year for President Eisenhower the Republican, meaning it was already a 4 year Republican administration and another 4 years starting up in that year 1956 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1956).

We know full well why they built that project.

:bigwhoop:

I'll give you that - Democrats do seem to make poverty situations worse because they're the biggest nannies and create dependency.

I'll give you that - Democrats do seem to make poverty situations worse because they're the biggest nannies and create dependency.


The Democrats want to make poverty worse by giving the poor food and housing and medical care and that you see as worse.

The Republicans want to make more pain and misery and call that as righteous when it is barbaric.

The Republicans want to cut off or cut down basic assistance like food and housing to the poorest of Americans, including that the Republicans want to deny the simplest basic health care to at least 30 million Americans, and probably twice that many who have inadequate health care.

They want to cut off Social Security while spending extra billions onto the military war machine.

The Republicans do not want to be nannies to the needy, as they want to be the cruel task masters in servitude for the very wealthiest Americans.

:coffee:

The Democrats want to make poverty worse by giving the poor food and housing and medical care and that you see as worse.

Exactly.

they're the biggest nannies and create dependency.

Exactly.


Perhaps it is that you are simply like most Republicans as you have never had a truly hard day in your entire life, and you can only view the rest of humanity through your own spoiled and pampered life.

If you ever went hungry then you might appreciate some food, or if you ever went homeless then you might appreciate housing, or have a medical need unfilled.

Apparently richer and privileged people do not have the ability to have compassion or empathy with anything or anyone outside of your own selfish self.

Looks that way to me.

:whistle:

Perhaps it is that you are simply like most Republicans as you have never had a truly hard day in your entire life, and you can only view the rest of humanity through your own spoiled and pampered life.

If you ever went hungry then you might appreciate some food, or if you ever went homeless then you might appreciate housing, or have a medical need unfilled.

Apparently richer and privileged people do not have the ability to have compassion or empathy with anything or anyone outside of your own selfish self.

Looks that way to me.

:whistle:

Maybe she never wanted to accept a handout from Uncle Sugar and decided to get her poop in a group on her own.:shrug:

I have no problem giving someone a hand up but I refuse to give hand outs.

Perhaps it is that you are simply like most Republicans as you have never had a truly hard day in your entire life, and you can only view the rest of humanity through your own spoiled and pampered life.

If you ever went hungry then you might appreciate some food, or if you ever went homeless then you might appreciate housing, or have a medical need unfilled.

Apparently richer and privileged people do not have the ability to have compassion or empathy with anything or anyone outside of your own selfish self.

Looks that way to me.

:whistle:

BS dude! Hollyweird pampered people, Warren Buffett, Bill Gates and the Kennedys are all Democrats and never had to worry about food. The notion is the Republicans are the people that have all the money is just the propaganda that the leftist spew to the ignorant.

The sad thing is the welfare entitled will never be indepedent and successful on their own. No worries because they will have a bigger house and a better car than the "Republican" like myself. Also they will always get that monthly check. So spare me with the going hungry sh$t and Republicans never have to earn a living. By the way I had three jobs at one time and serve in the military before that. Not bragging just proving that your point is completely wrong!

Perhaps it is that you are simply like most Republicans as you have never had a truly hard day in your entire life, and you can only view the rest of humanity through your own spoiled and pampered life.

If you ever went hungry then you might appreciate some food, or if you ever went homeless then you might appreciate housing, or have a medical need unfilled.

Apparently richer and privileged people do not have the ability to have compassion or empathy with anything or anyone outside of your own selfish self.

Looks that way to me.

:whistle:

Old article but relevant to this rant. *Note the bolded areas.

In his book, Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservativism (Basic Books, 2006), Brooks discovered that approximately equal percentages of liberals and conservatives give to private charitable causes. However, conservatives gave about 30 percent more money per year to private charitable causes, even though his study found liberal families earned an average of 6 percent more per year in income than did conservative families. This greater generosity among conservative families proved to be true in Brooks’ research for every income group, “from poor to middle class to rich.”

Read more: Conservatives Give More to Charity than Liberals? - Casting Stones (http://blog.beliefnet.com/castingstones/2008/04/conservatives-give-more-to-cha.html#ixzz21wUztQwK)

<snip typical racist rant devoid of anything resembling facts or empirical data.>

:bigwhoop:

Expiring Bush-Era Tax Cuts for the Rich Doesn't Get Rid of a Spending Problem | Mercatus (http://mercatus.org/publication/expiring-bush-era-tax-cuts-rich-doesnt-get-rid-spending-problem)

This sounds like a lot of money, but let’s put this number into perspective by looking at how much the federal government will be spending over the course of the next 10 years. Drawing on the president’s own data, the chart above shows that the government will spend more than $46.9 trillion. Even without interest payments, spending will still amount to $41.2 trillion. Moreover, the total interest paid on the debt will reach $5.7 trillion.

Now compare the size of the tax revenue increase to the total amount of spending, and you will see where the problem lies. Even if the president manages to collect an additional $967 billion by letting some of the Bush-Era tax cuts expire, Washington still has a spending problem.

Perhaps it is that you are simply like most Republicans as you have never had a truly hard day in your entire life, and you can only view the rest of humanity through your own spoiled and pampered life.

:roflmao:

Perhaps it is that you are simply like most Republicans as you have never had a truly hard day in your entire life, and you can only view the rest of humanity through your own spoiled and pampered life.



When I go to the Food Lion in LP at lunchtime, I'm the only one standing in line that has to go back to work. How do I know that? Because everyone else in line is wearing pajamas.

If you worked a bit harder, you might have been able to pay your child support.

Some people beg to have dog poo thrown at them.

xx dude! Hollyweird pampered people, Warren Buffett, Bill Gates and the Kennedys are all Democrats and never had to worry about food. The notion is the Republicans are the people that have all the money is just the propaganda that the leftist spew to the ignorant.


It is not really being said that the Republicans are rich, even if many of them are rich.

What is being said is that the Republicans kiss-up to the wealthy and privileged while kicking down at the poor and needy.

The Republicans gave tax breaks to the rich even when they did not ask for it, and the Republicans try to take away from the poorer and needy population without just cause.



The sad thing is the welfare entitled will never be indepedent and successful on their own. No worries because they will have a bigger house and a better car than the "Republican" like myself. Also they will always get that monthly check. So spare me with the going hungry sh$t and Republicans never have to earn a living. By the way I had three jobs at one time and serve in the military before that. Not bragging just proving that your point is completely wrong!


Poor people do NOT have "bigger houses" and do not have "better cars" and Welfare gives monthly checks only to a relative few who must severely qualify for the small checks.

This is one of those really strange things that has to be repeatedly told to Republicans - that poor people really are poor.

The poor people are not faking it as they really are poor.

And I really do not see how your claim of - "once having three jobs and you served in the military" - as proving any point.
What is your proven point? that you have never been poor or needy?

:whistle:

The Republicans gave tax breaks to the rich even when they did not ask for it, and the Republicans try to take away from the poorer and needy population without just cause.:

You are one sad confused piece of human flesh, Jimmy.

Just sayin..

It seems a bit peculiar to differentiate the "poor and blacks" as in the poor white folk and all black people are thereby equal, and of course "dysfunctional" too per Joe Rider.



Mother ####er, you do it all the time. Go pack sand you hypocritical windbag piece.

Mother ####er, you do it all the time. Go pack sand you hypocritical windbag piece.


I'm sorry -there was no call for my language or the personal attack.


What I meant to say was, perhaps you should direct your criticism toward items of which you are not, yourself, guilty.

The poor people are not faking it as they really are poor.



Why would someone who really is poor have a baby when babies cost a lot of money?

Why would someone who really is poor have a baby when babies cost a lot of money?


Having a baby is a normal healthy human body function.

How can some one like your self tell poor people not to have babies? as if only the richer people are allowed to use their normal body function based on their richer financial status.

Poor people have babies because God tells them to be fruitful and to multiply, and they have babies as an expression of their love, and other times it just happens.

We have long had a system which pushes poor people into perversions and pushes them into having abortions and pushes them into harlotry and debauchery, and here you have the gull to criticize a person for having a baby based on the money our society denies from the poor.

As especially we need to have universal health care provided to every American regardless of their status, as that would improve the plight of poor people having babies.

If the so called conservative Republicans really want to be against abortions, then they need to stop degrading parents who do have their baby.

:coffee:

Having a baby is a normal healthy human body function.

How can some one like your self tell poor people not to have babies? as if only the richer people are allowed to use their normal body function based on their richer financial status.

Poor people have babies because God tells them to be fruitful and to multiply, and they have babies as an expression of their love, and other times it just happens.

We have long had a system which pushes poor people into perversions and pushes them into having abortions and pushes them into harlotry and debauchery, and here you have the gull to criticize a person for having a baby based on the money our society denies from the poor.

As especially we need to have universal health care provided to every American regardless of their status, as that would improve the plight of poor people having babies.

If the so called conservative Republicans really want to be against abortions, then they need to stop degrading parents who do have their baby.

:coffee:

A poor person can have all the babies they want. Just don't expect someone else to feed them. Having babies without dealing with the costs later is something you have first hand knowledge of.

It seems a bit peculiar to differentiate the "poor and blacks" as in the poor white folk and all black people are thereby equal, and of course "dysfunctional" too per Joe Rider.What a warped interpretation. How do you equate "poor white folk" with "all black people"? I read the original statement to be "poor people, regardless of color" and "black people, regardless of wealth/financial situation".

The reason for taxing the rich is to make the taxing more fair and equitableJust for clarification, define "fair and equitable". Wouldn't "fair" be where everyone pays the same amount or percentage? I believe we, as a society, have taken onto account the inequities in some of the financial burdens we all face. As a result there are deductions and exemptions and credits to make it a bit fairer for those at a financial disadvantage. I'd like to know how it's "fair" for one person to pay 10% and another to pay 30%. I'd like to know how it's "equitable" for someone to pay thousands and others to pay little or nothing. And how is it any "fairer" to say to someone that they need to pay more and at the same time tell someone else they still don't have to pay anything.

...also it is meant to decrease the National debt and the budget over spending...If Congress "confiscated" 1/2 of all assets from all the billionaires in the US with the sole purpose of paying down the debt, I would wager the clowns in DC would see the windfall as a chance to further spend like drunken sailors. Until they can learn how to spend what they get and stop thinking they can continue to bleed the people dry it is only then can they even talk about raising taxes with the purpose to pay down the debt.

...and it is wanted to make right the never ending legacy of the Bush era tax breaks for the very rich and the out of control spending by the last Bush administration. Do you at least acknowledge that the current administration has increase the out of control spending? Do you acknowledge that the current administration already had the opportunity to end those evil tax breaks but chose to extend them? If they are so bad, then why didn't this administration just let them expire?

You (JoeRider) are the one trying to twist the reasoning into your own perverted idea, as shown in the quoted words above.Pot...meet...kettle.

A poor person can have all the babies they want. Just don't expect someone else to feed them. Having babies without dealing with the costs later is something you have first hand knowledge of.


I would say that you are wrong, but that is so far from complete.

What you are being is cold-hearted and cruel.

There really is no morally sound reason as to why any new parent(s) does not receive lots of help and assistance with their new baby, including help from their neighbors, their family, society, their government, and simply get help from every corner and from everyone.

It takes a village to raise a child, and that means the village helping out with both of the two parents.

The modern idea that the parents must face the world alone and even in competition or opposition to their neighbors is so extremely barbaric that it goes lower then anything in all recorded history.

We put way too much pressure on parents, and that is what really destroys families in this world.

:bigwhoop:

I forgot. Obama built you. Well, he didn't build me and I wouldn't want him building any of my kids.

When animals can't take care of their litter they abandon, kill or even eat their young. All people are asking is these people use a damn rubber.

When animals can't take care of their litter they abandon, kill or even eat their young. All people are asking is these people use a damn rubber.

Which the government pays for.

JP says is cruel to expect poor folks not to have babies.

Which the government pays for.

I wish his dad wore one.

I forgot. Obama built you. Well, he didn't build me and I wouldn't want him building any of my kids.


Yes of course that there is the real point - that you simply do not want that black man to be the President of our USA.

Well all we need is the majority vote to reelect President Obama to another 4 years, and we do not need any of the little bigots to like it.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




All people are asking is these people use a damn rubber.


The point that Republicans want people to use a condom is truly about as intrusive as any gov can get.

The Republicans want their intrusive gov to come between a man and a woman literally and factually.

I figure that most Americans want the Republicans to stay out of our beds.

:huggy:

I wish his dad wore one.

The son he abandoned thinks the same thing

I figure that most Americans want the Republicans to stay out of our beds.

:huggy:

Believe me nobody wants to be in your bed, and nobody wants another of your crotch droppings running arround.

Typical JP progressive thinking. All talk, no action. I suggest watching this movie: To Live. The hospital scene is going to be our medical care 10 years from now thanks to Obamacare.

Fugui and Jiazhen endure tumultuous events in China as their personal fortunes move from wealthy landownership to peasantry. Addicted to gambling, Fugui loses everything. In the years that follow he is pressed into both the nationalist and communist armies, while Jiazhen is forced into menial work. They raise a family and survive, managing "to live" from the 40's to the 70's in this epic, but personal, story of life through an amazing period. Written by docraven


To Live (1994) - Plot Summary (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110081/plotsummary)

Yes of course that there is the real point - that you simply do not want that black man to be the President of our USA.

Well all we need is the majority vote to reelect President Obama to another 4 years, and we do not need any of the little bigots to like it.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




The point that Republicans want people to use a condom is truly about as intrusive as any gov can get.

The Republicans want their intrusive gov to come between a man and a woman literally and factually.

I figure that most Americans want the Republicans to stay out of our beds.

:huggy:


You are correct; he is the fiscally irresponsible and economically damaging President that's been elected since Jimmy Carter.

As far as your statement about Republican "bedroom" infringement :crazy: ; I guess it's ok for you to use your EBT card to buy lottery tickets and beer .....it's Dems like you that push Independents toward the right

You are correct; he is the fiscally irresponsible and economically damaging President that's been elected since Jimmy Carter.

As far as your statement about Republican "bedroom" infringement :crazy: ; I guess it's ok for you to use your EBT card to buy lottery tickets and beer .....it's Dems like you that push Independents toward the right

I think its great to have dems like him right now.
All we need is for the majority of voters to be Americans, and we can push the Fiscally irresponsible waste of skin out of the white house. and there is nothing that those like JPC can do about it.

now, if I were president, one of the first things I would do is to overhaul the welfare system. I would have people go out and see if someone actually is able to work, and if they are able to do even the most menial of tasks to make money, They would get notice that in 30 days their checks would no longer be coming.

This means that people like JPC would have no choice but to find employment.

This means that people like JPC would have no choice but to find employment.

Well that could be a problem too!

Survival of the fittest. How is a condom any more intrusive than the government spending hard working citizens tax dollars to care for people who do not have the ambition to succeed at life. You do not see the issues that everyone else does as you are one of these ignorant people.

You compare!


Hiroshima and Detroit: The Damage Democrats Do to the Poor Lasts Longer Than a Nuclear Bomb | FrontPage Magazine (http://frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/call-it-hiroshima-and-detroit-the-damage-democrats-do-to-the-poor-lasts-longer-than-a-nuclear-bomb/)


What has caused more long term destruction - the A-bomb, or Government welfare programs created to buy the votes of those who want someone to take care of them?

Japan does not have a welfare system. Work for it or do without.

These are possibly the 5 best sentences you’ll ever read and all applicable to this experiment:

1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.

2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!

5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.

You compare!

Hiroshima and Detroit: The Damage Democrats Do to the Poor Lasts Longer Than a Nuclear Bomb | FrontPage Magazine (http://frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/call-it-hiroshima-and-detroit-the-damage-democrats-do-to-the-poor-lasts-longer-than-a-nuclear-bomb/)


That is truly ridiculous if not just plain stupid.

As if the people in Detroit would chose death by nuclear bomb instead of the Democratic Party.

And even the very rich and wealthy in Detroit (or anywhere) would accept welfare assistance instead of nuclear destruction.

And the destruction done to the people throughout the USA is done by the exploits of our Capitalism and not by any political party.



What has caused more long term destruction - the A-bomb, or Government welfare programs created to buy the votes of those who want someone to take care of them?


There is no such thing as any gov welfare program created to buy votes.

That is Joe's paranoid claim, or probably the Republican Party's paranoid claim.



Japan does not have a welfare system. Work for it or do without.


That is just nonsense, because Japan does have a very active Welfare systm, one of many links HERE (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_welfare_in_Japan).

In fact every Country and type of people and even every savage tribe throughout humanity have always had social welfare systems.

The old Roman Empire had it, ancient Egypt was built on that idea, and a social welfare system is described in details in the Bible from at least 3,000 years ago which was carried onward ever after.

The very idea of denying health care and denying food and shelter to the poor and needy is a very modern barbarism which only comes out of the inhuman Republican Party.



These are possibly the 5 best sentences you’ll ever read and all applicable to this experiment:

1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
No one is trying to do this. By taxing the wealthy we do not make them as poor, because the wealthy remain wealthy even after paying their fair share in taxes. It is NOT about making the poor into being wealthy but about giving the poor their simple basic human rights like food and housing and health care.

2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
That is what the wealthiest Capitalist do, because the wealthy do not work as they simply count their exploited money taken from the working class. That is the old slave plantation mentality.

3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
Taxes are paid as a rightful debt and taxes are NOT taken as like stealing. After collecting the taxes the gov gives back to all citizens including both to the rich and to the poor.

4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!
Certainly can, and it is done all the time. Recently when Facebook went public then it divided its wealth amongst millions of different people.

5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.
That is a blind ignorant ideal of the "Tea Party" and no one else thinks in that perverted way. And it does not signal the end of a nation but just the end of the ignorant Tea Party - and the sooner the better.


:yeahthat: In red.

:whistle:

I see your enjoying that computer I paid for.

I see your enjoying that computer I paid for.


That is just so pitiful.

One time you guys are crying about the tax money being taken away from you, then other times you brag about your tax money being spent.

This is the same type of oxymoron of Republicans as they kiss-up to the wealthy and privileged while kicking down at the poor and needy, link = post #17 (http://forums.somd.com/elections/251315-democrats-do-not-care-about-poor-2.html#post4880592), so now one of your kind complains and brags about the exact same thing.

Maybe you "czygvtwkr" agree with the stupid claim of "Joe" along with his stupid link -
- that I would be better off to get a nuclear bomb dropped onto me.... boom boom boom .... ha ha ha ha :killingme

:lmao:

then other times you brag about your tax money being spent.:


Your sarcasm detector broke again, Jimmy? :coffee:

Your sarcasm detector broke again, Jimmy? :coffee:


No, it is not broke, as I meant no sarcasm.

The Republicans really do talk and claim as if they themselves are paying the welfare to needy Americans, when in fact the same Republicans are actively trying to take away food from the hungry, to take away housing from the poor, to deny health care to the sick and the dying, trying to end Social Security, so the Republicans are NOT providing the Social Services or the welfare assistance to the needy American citizens.

We are fortunate to have our Democratic Party who defies the inhumanity and barbarism of the nasty Republican Party.

:barf:

No, it is not broke, as I meant no sarcasm.

:

After your meds have worn off a little, read all that again. I meant yours is broken as in: you lost the ability to detect the overt sarcasm in someone else's prior post.

Jeez. Your thickness just takes all the fun out of this sometimes.

After your meds have worn off a little, read all that again. I meant yours is broken as in: you lost the ability to detect the overt sarcasm in someone else's prior post.

Jeez. Your thickness just takes all the fun out of this sometimes.


Gilligan, Gilligan, Gilligan.

You do not speak for the other poster or for their posting, and surely I would never presume such a thing about the other poster whether you say so about them or not.

The other poster is taking credit for paying the cost of my computer and obviously I am enjoying it, so that is NOT sarcasm even if you see it as sarcasm.

Your fun is taken out of this exchange because you are simply trying to be nasty, and I make your self to wallow in your own nastiness.

Like rubber and glue - it bounces off and sticks to you. :killingme

:cds:

That is just so pitiful.



It sure is.

Gilligan, Gilligan, Gilligan.

You do not speak for the other poster or for their posting, and surely I would never presume such a thing about the other poster whether you say so about them or not.

The other poster is taking credit for paying the cost of my computer and obviously I am enjoying it, so that is NOT sarcasm even if you see it as sarcasm.

Your fun is taken out of this exchange because you are simply trying to be nasty, and I make your self to wallow in your own nastiness.

Like rubber and glue - it bounces off and sticks to you. :killingme

:cds:

Did you ever graduate from elementary school Jimmy? Just curious. :buddies:

The other poster is taking credit for paying the cost of my computer and obviously I am enjoying it, so that is NOT sarcasm even if you see it as sarcasm.

:doh:

Tox..you need to learn to view Jimmy more like I do..as a true walking medical miracle and an astounding gift to science.

Proofs positive that life as we sometimes define it can, and does, continue to emote and motor, without the slightest influence from any discernible brain activity.

:buddies:

Can you say Union!



Can you say B.S.



Government Bailout of Ford GM Chrysler and the Auto Industry (http://useconomy.about.com/od/criticalssues/a/auto_bailout.htm)

Very good breakdown of the whole thing, and why.

Can you say Union!


1hhJ_49leBw

Can you say B.S.


.
I have to agree with Giantone this time. The unions are B.S.

At least Giantone realizes that its the unions that had a great part in moving companies overseas.

I have to agree with Giantone this time. The unions are not to blame.

At least Giantone realizes that its the unions that had a great part in moving country out of the Great Depression and creating a middle class.


fixed.:yay::patriot:

I have to agree with Giantone this time. The unions are the backbone of this country.

At least Giantone realizes that its the unions that help this country remain great.

fixed...:yay:
Just like..bcp....said, the Unions even gave concessions



The auto bailout proposal from the Big 3 auto companies totaled $34 billion in government loans. In return, the companies promised to fast-track development of energy-efficient vehicles, and consolidate operations. GM and Ford agreed to streamline the number of brands they produced. They also won agreements from the UAW union to delay contributions to a health trust fund for retirees and reduce payments to laid-off workers. The three CEO's agreed to work for $1 a year and sell their corporate jets.

fixed...:yay:
Just like..bcp....said, the Unions even gave concessions



The auto bailout proposal from the Big 3 auto companies totaled $34 billion in government loans. In return, the companies promised to fast-track development of energy-efficient vehicles, and consolidate operations. GM and Ford agreed to streamline the number of brands they produced. They also won agreements from the UAW union to delay contributions to a health trust fund for retirees and reduce payments to laid-off workers. The three CEO's agreed to work for $1 a year and sell their corporate jets.

:roflmao: :offtopic:

My grandfather was part of the beginning of the AFL-CIO. Nothing is like it used to be. Obama will be out, Romney will be in, but it will not be good until we get a true American in office in 2016. Where is Tom, Abe, or Ike when we need them? Oh, yes, they are dead, just like our country. Whatever will Barry and Michelle do when it is over? Move to France, and live like it is 300 years ago; plenty of cake.

The auto bailout proposal from the Big 3 auto companies totaled $34 billion in government loans. In return, the companies promised to fast-track development of energy-efficient vehicles, and consolidate operations. GM and Ford agreed to streamline the number of brands they produced. They also won agreements from the UAW union to delay contributions to a health trust fund for retirees and reduce payments to laid-off workers. The three CEO's agreed to work for $1 a year and sell their corporate jets.

Apparently you do not understand the legal requirement (restated in sticky's on this very forum) to provide attribution for the text that you copy and past in to a post response. People have been banned for less and this is not the first time you've done it.

Like this, for example:

http://stateofred.com/wordpress/?p=17528



Auto Bailout Specifics
The auto bailout proposal from the Big 3 auto companies totaled $34 billion in government loans. In return, the companies promised to fast-track development of energy-efficient vehicles, and consolidate operations. GM and Ford agreed to streamline the number of brands they produced. They also won agreements from the UAW union to delay contributions to a health trust fund for retirees and reduce payments to laid-off workers. The three CEO's agreed to work for $1 a year and sell their corporate jets.

Apparently you do not understand the legal requirement (restated in sticky's on this very forum) to provide attribution for the text that you copy and past in to a post response. People have been banned for less and this is not the first time you've done it.


:buttkiss::buttkiss::buttkiss::whistle:

Can you say B.S.



Government Bailout of Ford GM Chrysler and the Auto Industry (http://useconomy.about.com/od/criticalssues/a/auto_bailout.htm)

Very good breakdown of the whole thing, and why.

Yes, I can say the Union is full of BS - did you read it -

Ford's Bailout Proposal
Ford requested a $9 billion line-of-credit from the government, and a $5 billion loan from the Energy Department. Ford pledged to accelerate development of both hybrid and battery-powered vehicles, retool plants to increase production of smaller cars, close dealerships, and sell Volvo. Ford is in better shape than GM or Chrysler because it had already mortgaged its assets in 2006 to raise $24.5 billion. Although Ford didn't need, and didn't receive any funds, it also didn't want its competition to get the upper hand thanks to the government bailout.


Also did you read this:


Did Obama admin officials lie to Congress about Delphi pension termination?


Emails obtained by The Daily Caller show that the U.S. Treasury Department, led by Timothy Geithner, was the driving force behind terminating the pensions of 20,000 salaried retirees at the Delphi auto parts manufacturing company.

The move, made in 2009 while the Obama administration implemented its auto bailout plan, appears to have been made solely because those retirees were not members of labor unions.

The internal government emails contradict sworn testimony, in federal court and before Congress, given by several Obama administration figures. They also indicate that the administration misled lawmakers and the courts about the sequence of events surrounding the termination of those non-union pensions, and that administration figures violated federal law.




One question in particular will be why the PBGC terminated the non-union pension while taxpayers absorbed the union pension obligations, and whether that outcome was coordinated all along by the White House.

Did Obama admin officials lie to Congress about Delphi pension termination? « Hot Air (http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/07/did-obama-admin-officials-lie-to-congress-about-delphi-pension-termination/)

:buttkiss::buttkiss::buttkiss::whistle:

You are just the king of the snappy retort, aren't you?

So you are OK with being a rampant plagiarizer..that's your message?

Fine. I'll make sure every example gets flagged..:howdy: Thye are very easy to find...containing things like coherent and properly structured sentences..:killingme

You are just the king of the snappy retort, aren't you?

So you are OK with being a rampant plagiarizer..that's your message?

Fine. I'll make sure every example gets flagged.

I put links everywhere......,I'm sure you will.:cds::cds::cds:

I put links everywhere......,I'm sure you will:

Here's a link. At this link..you will see there are no links. Just some plagiarized text posted by a copy-n-paste artist with a very limited grasp of the English language (what gave you away..:killingme)


http://forums.somd.com/elections/251315-democrats-do-not-care-about-poor-6.html#post4888172


And here's another link; Enjoy:

http://forums.somd.com/news-current-events/27673-important-note-posting-copyrighted-information.html

Here's a link. At this link..you will see there are no links. Just some plagiarized text posted by a copy-n-paste artist with a very limited grasp of the English language (what gave you away..:killingme)

http://forums.somd.com/elections/251315-democrats-do-not-care-about-poor-6.html#post4888172

And here's another link; Enjoy:

http://forums.somd.com/news-current-events/27673-important-note-posting-copyrighted-information.html

That was not plagiarizing or copyright infringement.

He gave the info from the same link which he provided, and it was given as a direct rebuttal.

It is only your self who is adding nothing to the discussion.

:bigwhoop:

It is only your self who is adding nothing to the discussion.

:bigwhoop:

Spoken from the master.

He gave the info from the same link which he provided, :

Where Jimmy?..where is that link? What the goobertone posted that was plagiarized was not even put in a quote box, for chrissakes. Just another paragraph in a post that he wanted to look like it was something he wrote.

Do you have some kind of device that tells you when to breath in and when to breath out?

fixed.:yay::patriot:

No buttnugget, I think I posted what I meant.
Unions are for the weak the stupid and the lazy.

Where Jimmy?..where is that link?


His link is in his posting on page #6 and posting number 51.

Link to it here = http://forums.somd.com/elections/251315-democrats-do-not-care-about-poor-6.html#post4888040

His quote comes from his given link - see on his link 5 or 6 paragraphs down depending on how one counts the paragraphs, link to his link = HERE (http://useconomy.about.com/od/criticalssues/a/auto_bailout.htm).

:coffee:

His quote :

pssst..slow guy...there is no quote. No attribtuion..no quote..nuthin but open text. :howdy:

Perhaps it is that you are simply like most Republicans as you have never had a truly hard day in your entire life, and you can only view the rest of humanity through your own spoiled and pampered life.

If you ever went hungry then you might appreciate some food, or if you ever went homeless then you might appreciate housing, or have a medical need unfilled.

Apparently richer and privileged people do not have the ability to have compassion or empathy with anything or anyone outside of your own selfish self.

Looks that way to me.

:whistle:
Apparently you know of what you speak. I am a republican, I've been hungry, lived in subsidized housing and had no insurance. You will never believe what I did next...... I GOT A JOB!!!!!!

Apparently you know of what you speak. I am a republican, I've been hungry, lived in subsidized housing and had no insurance. You will never believe what I did next...... I GOT A JOB!!!!!!

*GASP*...oh noes!.....you d'int!

Dems in Massachusetts do care! They care so much they are sending voter registration forms to 478,000 people on public assistance because they care so much! :jet:


The state’s Department of Transitional Assistance sent registration forms last month, along with prepaid return #envelopes, as part of an interim settlement over a lawsuit alleg#ing that the department has consistently failed to comply with federal voter registration law.

The suit was filed in May by a pair of voting rights groups that were represented by #Demos, an advocacy and public policy organization from New York that has brought similar actions in more than a half-dozen states.

Warren’s daughter, Amelia Warren Tyagi, chairs the group’s board of trustees, prompting accusations that the lawsuit was motivated by partisan and personal interest.

“I want every legal vote to count, but it’s outrageous to use taxpayer dollars to register welfare recipients as part of a special effort to boost one political party,” Brown said. “This effort to sign up welfare recipients is being aided by Elizabeth #Warren’s daughter and it’s clearly designed to benefit her mother’s political campaign.”

Demos and state officials #denied that the mailings were politically motivated, and Warren’s campaign dismissed the senator’s assertion.

Brown criticizes voter registration mailing to Mass. welfare recipients - News - Boston.com (http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2012/08/09/state-mails-welfare-recipients-voter-registration-form-sparking-political-row/68MYXrkhb74Phl3eMMlKJJ/story.html)

Apparently you know of what you speak. I am a republican, I've been hungry, lived in subsidized housing and had no insurance. You will never believe what I did next...... I GOT A JOB!!!!!!


Congratulations, and what you are demonstrating is that our Social welfare system does work and did work.

The same sort of situation applies to the vast majority of citizens on Public Assistance programs - in that most of them are actively seeking a decent job and trying to better themselves.

Cheers to all.

:yahoo:



++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++





Dems in Massachusetts do care! They care so much they are sending voter registration forms to 478,000 people on public assistance because they care so much! :jet:

“I want every legal vote to count, but it’s outrageous to use taxpayer dollars to register welfare recipients as part of a special effort to boost one political party,” Brown said. “This effort to sign up welfare recipients is being aided by Elizabeth #Warren’s daughter and it’s clearly designed to benefit her mother’s political campaign.”

Demos and state officials #denied that the mailings were politically motivated, and Warren’s campaign dismissed the senator’s assertion.

Brown criticizes voter registration mailing to Mass. welfare recipients - News - Boston.com (http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2012/08/09/state-mails-welfare-recipients-voter-registration-form-sparking-political-row/68MYXrkhb74Phl3eMMlKJJ/story.html)


We can see by the poster at the top here "luvmygdaughters" that not all welfare recipients are Democrats, as she is a Republican who was on Welfare.

There are Republicans too who find themselves as poor and needing assistance, just as does all types of citizens.

I would agree that any truly smart and socially conscious citizens would vote the Democratic Party regardless of their money status, but many are not so smart.

:coffee:

Congratulations, and what you are demonstrating is that our Social welfare system does work and did work.

The same sort of situation applies to the vast majority of citizens on Public Assistance programs - in that most of them are actively seeking a decent job and trying to better themselves.

Cheers to all.

:yahoo:



++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++





We can see by the poster at the top here "luvmygdaughters" that not all welfare recipients are Democrats, as she is a Republican who was on Welfare.

There are Republicans too who find themselves as poor and needing assistance, just as does all types of citizens.

I would agree that any truly smart and socially conscious citizens would vote the Democratic Party regardless of their money status, but many are not so smart.

:coffee:

I'm homeless, Jimmy. Have been for 6 months now. Tell me where I need to apply for all this free money. Thanks in advance.:buddies:

I'm homeless, Jimmy. Have been for 6 months now. Tell me where I need to apply for all this free money. Thanks in advance.:buddies:


Since you promote the Republican garbage then I say not to worry about such things and just go drink another beer.

Obviously you are lying about your own condition, and surely you must see that as being funny or clever which it is neither.

As to free money then there is no free money that I know of, or at least no official source of free money from the Gov, but there are charitable people like myself who will give away free money to anyone who deserves it.

Of course no one here on this thread has said anything about any free money, so you your self are the only teller here.

:cds:

Obviously you are lying about your own condition, and surely you must see that as being funny or clever which it is neither.

:

Jimmy..your rapier wit cuts me to the core. I am indeed homeless. My homeless condition is even documented by a picture, with caption, on the front page of the Enterprise, 10 February 2012 edition.

So now you stoop so low as to berate and belittle the homeless?? Have you no shame man? None at all?

I am indeed homeless. My homeless condition is even documented by a picture, with caption, on the front page of the Enterprise, 10 February 2012 edition.


You are the one on this forum who constantly and repeatedly cries and complains about links and links and links, and yet you give nothing but your blasted hot air.

Thank you for nothing, and I say you are nothing but a pretentious fraud.

:bigwhoop:

You are the one on this forum who constantly and repeatedly cries and complains about links and links and links, and yet you give nothing but your blasted hot air.

Thank you for nothing, and I say you are nothing but a pretentious fraud.

:bigwhoop:

Not very Christian of you.

http://forums.somd.com/news-current-events/240507-first-time-i-ever-made-big-time-local-news.html

You are the one on this forum who constantly and repeatedly cries and complains about links and links and links, and yet you give nothing but your blasted hot air.

Thank you for nothing, and I say you are nothing but a pretentious fraud.

:bigwhoop:Do you feel no shame ever?

I say you are nothing but a pretentious fraud.

:

A fraud?...in what way, Jimmy? :howdy:

Do you feel no shame ever?

As someone who lives entirely from public assistance and who has shirked every responsiblity he ever faced in his entire life...there is simply no room for any shame in Jimmy.

His head would explode.

Do you feel no shame ever?

Evidently, not.

Not very Christian of you.

http://forums.somd.com/news-current-events/240507-first-time-i-ever-made-big-time-local-news.html


So I went through all 14 pages and still I saw no link from Mr "thank you in advance".

Perhaps that is how the Republicans view being "homeless" and I maintain that is still a pretentious fraud.

Of course that same "Gilligan" is also one of those Republicans who wants to deny food stamps and housing assistance to people who really are poor.

According to that thread and per his own words - he is being given a brand new house for free from his excellent Allstate Insurance, and he says that people gave him lots of free stuff as assistance for him even while his insurance was covering and paying for everything he needed.

His house burned down so he was house-less but he was not "homeless" as having no place to live and left outside like an animal - as are treated the real homeless population.

And Rose you challenge my Christianity in this - so let me explain that real Christianity is to be based on truthfulness and on charity, so my conscience is very clear in this regard of our fraudulent Gilligan.

As I said above in post 73 - he calls himself as "homeless" as if he is being funny or clever when it is neither.

Homeless and needy Gilligan = puke :barf:

Of course that same "Gilligan" is also one of those Republicans who wants to deny food stamps and housing assistance to people who really are poor.
:

*gasp* Gilligan wants that? Where did he say that? Where, Jimmy, where?? Please provide a link..a quote..some indication of sentient life that would prevent the doc from removing your life support..anything.:buddies:

he is being given a brand new house for free from his excellent Allstate Insurance,:

:killingme:killingme So much contradiction and irony in one short incoherent sentence.

Say Jimmy..how does one obtain homeowners insurance? "Hint: they pay for it. If its good insurance..they pay a lot for it.":killingme

Say Jimmy..how does one obtain homeowners insurance?


There is no contradiction.

You claim to be homeless while your insurance Company is building you a band new house.

If people like your self ever really do face being really homeless (http://www.nationalhomeless.org/donate/index.html) then your old pretensions would become your shame.

:coffee:

There is no contradiction.

You claim to be homeless while your insurance Company is building you a band new house.

If people like your self ever really do face being really homeless (http://www.nationalhomeless.org/donate/index.html) then your old pretensions would become your shame.

:coffee:

Say Jimmy..how does one obtain homeowners insurance? What was it that is "free"? (Your own words..just trying to help you keep your addled thought process moving along. That's what friends do for friends. :buddies:)

oh yeah..and this: http://forums.somd.com/elections/251315-democrats-do-not-care-about-poor-9.html#post4892141

Perhaps that is how the Republicans view being "homeless" and I maintain that is still a pretentious fraud.

Of course that same "Gilligan" is also one of those Republicans who wants to deny food stamps and housing assistance to people who really are poor.



I dont think Gilligan has ever come out and said anything of the sort.
I on the other hand have no problem saying that, people like you, that could work, but refuse, should get no assistance at all.
People that can work and would rather live off the taxpayers back deserve to be cut off from all public money and let die in the street.

I have no problem with this and as a bonus it will create shovel ready jobs.

See, just so there is no question here.

I AM AT A POINT THAT I WOULD RATHER SEE YOU STARVE TO DEATH THAN TO CONTINUE PAYING TAXES TO KEEP YOUR LAZY ASS ALIVE.

Feel free to quote that anytime you think it worthwhile.

Say Jimmy..how does one obtain homeowners insurance? What was it that is "free"? (Your own words..just trying to help you keep your addled thought process moving along. That's what friends do for friends. :buddies:)

oh yeah..and this: http://forums.somd.com/elections/251315-democrats-do-not-care-about-poor-9.html#post4892141


I myself am satisfied with the entire display, so I see nothing more to add.

If you yourself want to deny the rightful accusations against you then you are free to deny them here and now.

Or you can provide your own links if you your self really want any link(s).

As to the subject of this thread:

It is only the Democratic Party that tries to help and to defend the poorest and most vulnerable of citizens against the selfish and greedy and inhuman ideas of the Republican Party.

:howdy:

I dont think Gilligan has ever come out and said anything of the sort.
I on the other hand have no problem saying that, people like you, that could work, but refuse, should get no assistance at all.
.

Jimmy probably had the two of us confused. He's easily confused and you and I look so much alike, after all.

Or you can provide your own links if you your self really want any link(s).

:

You make an unsubstantiated claim about something you said I supposedly posted and you want me to find links to that?? :killingme:killingme:killingme

Yr a riot, Jimmy-boy. A riot.

You make an unsubstantiated claim about something you said I supposedly posted and you want me to find links to that?? :killingme:killingme:killingme

Yr a riot, Jimmy-boy. A riot.

I fear that his pet like lifestyle has left him thinking that its acceptable to have everyone else do everything for him.
It surprises me that he is able to wipe himself without an assistant.

and from what I have heard from people that have had the misfortune of seeing him in public, that wiping thing might actually be an issue.

... :blahblah: ... :blahblah: ... :blahblah:


... :blahblah: ... :blahblah: ... :blahblah:


You two have deteriorated and I am not playing along in childish games.

If anyone wants to discuss the subject, then my posting above number 87 is the last word.

:whistle:

You two have deteriorated and I am not playing along in childish games.

If anyone wants to discuss the subject, then my posting above number 87 is the last word.

:whistle:

From you? Ever? Please?

You two have deteriorated and I am not playing along in childish games.

If anyone wants to discuss the subject, then my posting above number 87 is the last word.

:whistle:

Word.


LMAO..so now I'm "deteriorated". I've been tore right up more than a few times..is that the same thing? No? :killingme

If anyone wants to discuss the subject, then my posting above number 87 is the last word.


Last word my a$$. You never stop talking.

You two have deteriorated and I am not playing along in childish games.

If anyone wants to discuss the subject, then my posting above number 87 is the last word.

:yeahthat:


Last word xx xxx. You never stop talking.


If I must explain to everyone of you, then what I said was that my last word on post number 87 is talking about the thread subject.

It is NOT saying that I intend to stop talking or stop posting or any such nonsense as that.

As it says in my words that I was not going along with the games of the childish posters, and so if anyone wants to discuss the actual subject then my last words on the thread subject are there on #87.

Duh, and double duh, and here Joe gets the triple duh, as if any of you might actually read the words in the post instead of your own daydreams.

:yahoo:

So I went through all 14 pages and still I saw no link from Mr "thank you in advance".

Perhaps that is how the Republicans view being "homeless" and I maintain that is still a pretentious fraud.

Of course that same "Gilligan" is also one of those Republicans who wants to deny food stamps and housing assistance to people who really are poor.

According to that thread and per his own words - he is being given a brand new house for free from his excellent Allstate Insurance, and he says that people gave him lots of free stuff as assistance for him even while his insurance was covering and paying for everything he needed.

His house burned down so he was house-less but he was not "homeless" as having no place to live and left outside like an animal - as are treated the real homeless population.

And Rose you challenge my Christianity in this - so let me explain that real Christianity is to be based on truthfulness and on charity, so my conscience is very clear in this regard of our fraudulent Gilligan.

As I said above in post 73 - he calls himself as "homeless" as if he is being funny or clever when it is neither.

Homeless and needy Gilligan = puke :barf:

And as a liberal, just where did the government assist Gilligan? Aren't they the safety net you want? Insurance doesn't replace his belongings that were precious to him. Have you no decency, sir?!

Yes, two can play your game suckaaa!

:yeahthat:


If I must explain to everyone of you, then what I said was that my last word on post number 87 is talking about the thread subject.

It is NOT saying that I intend to stop talking or stop posting or any such nonsense as that.

As it says in my words that I was not going along with the games of the childish posters, and so if anyone wants to discuss the actual subject then my last words on the thread subject are there on #87.

Duh, and double duh, and here Joe gets the triple duh, as if any of you might actually read the words in the post instead of your own daydreams.

:yahoo:

Jimmy, Jimmy, Jimmy..you really should stop drunk-posting buddy. Not a single person on here has the first clue what you just meant. :buddies:

And as a liberal, just where did the government assist Gilligan? Aren't they the safety net you want? Insurance doesn't replace his belongings that were precious to him. Have you no decency, sir?!

Yes, two can play your game xxxxxxx!


Of course the insurance pays for his belongings, just as the insurance on my own apartment covers the building and everything in it.

I never said anything about the gov giving assistance to that rich Republican, as it was Gilligan himself who had the dishonesty to call himself as "homeless" when he was nothing of the sort.

See here = National Coalition for the Homeless (http://nationalhomeless.org/)

I am happy that he has insurance to build him a new house for free, and to give him free cash money to replace his lost personal possessions, as I see the insurance companies as huge big thieves in this world - so let them pay.

But real homeless people do not have the luxurious benefits as our Gilligan here has, and he has no right to present himself as such a thing which he surely is not.

I see it like the dishonest pretensions of this thread, in claiming the Democratic Party is not the true defender of the people who really are poor and needy, while the Republican Party only cares about their rich and privileged people getting more and more and more ....

And it was Gilligan who presented himself as wanting more "free money" to assist him in his fraudulant homeless condition, see post #72 on page 8 (http://forums.somd.com/elections/251315-democrats-do-not-care-about-poor-8.html#post4891658).


:patriot:

Most people on here consider you a fraud and dishonest claiming to be too disabled to work.

Most people on here consider you a fraud and dishonest claiming to be too disabled to work.


You say "most people" but I do not see the few childish posters of this forum as representing most people.

To believe is a virtue, while failure to believe is not a virtue.

One would think - why you do not question your own reasoning.

You are going to believe that the rich pampered Gilligan is a homeless person, while for a person like me who had to get many Doctors to verify my disabilities, and I even had to go through an administrative hearing in front of a real Judge (http://www.disabilitysecrets.com/administrative-law-judge.html).

Disability Planner: What We Mean By Disability (http://www.socialsecurity.gov/dibplan/dqualify4.htm)

If anyone can go through that process and fake a disability = it would be as blatant as a rich person claming to be homeless.

You yourself need to look into your own integrity as to why you believe nonsense claims, while you fail to believe the given truths.

:coffee:

You say "most people" but I do not see the few childish posters of this forum as representing most people.

:

Per'aps not. But what about all the rest on this forum that also think you are a fraud?:howdy:

You are going to believe that the rich pampered Gilligan is a homeless person, :

I've made it!

Seriously though...how do you think I achieved the official JPC "rich and pampered" status, eh Jimmy? And why didn't you achieve it also? Hmm?

I've made it!

Seriously though...how do you think I achieved the official JPC "rich and pampered" status, eh Jimmy? And why didn't you achieve it also? Hmm?


I really would have been a very rich person myself if I had not had my own catastrophes happen to me along my way, and that is not really a complaint as I live with my life choices for better and for worse.

And very rich people will jump out of the window if they get down to just a few million dollars, so I do understand your privileged confusion even if I do pick at you for it.

FYI - The people on the TV show "Gilligan's Island (http://www.tv.com/shows/gilligans-island/)" were NOT homeless either.

They had an entire island as their home.

The Skipper and Mary-Ann and all the rest could build their own houses or huts or even sleep outside if they wanted, because the entire island was their home.

Real-life people who are homeless do NOT have any land or property, as real homeless people are trespassers wherever they go, because they really do not have any home or place to go where they can sleep or even to rest without the fear of harassment and worse.

If my own life had gone differently without my own big catastrophes then I would now probably be a self righteous Republican too.

:coffee:

ruh roh Jimmy. One of your postulations just ran away screaming in agony.

This one:

You say "most people" but I do not see the few childish posters of this forum as representing most people

I really would have been a very rich person myself if I had not had my own catastrophes happen to me along my way, and that is not really a complaint as I live with my life choices for better and for worse.

And very rich people will jump out of the window if they get down to just a few million dollars, so I do understand your privileged confusion even if I do pick at you for it.

FYI - The people on the TV show "Gilligan's Island (http://www.tv.com/shows/gilligans-island/)" were NOT homeless either.

They had an entire island as their home.

The Skipper and Mary-Ann and all the rest could build their own houses or huts or even sleep outside if they wanted, because the entire island was their home.

Real-life people who are homeless do NOT have any land or property, as real homeless people are trespassers wherever they go, because they really do not have any home or place to go where they can sleep or even to rest without the fear of harassment and worse.

If my own life had gone differently without my own big catastrophes then I would now probably be a self righteous Republican too.

:coffee:

Seriously though...how do you think I achieved the official JPC "rich and pampered" status, eh Jimmy? And why didn't you achieve it also? Hmm?

Pssst Gilligans island was just a TV show, they weren't real.

pssst..Jimmy. And if you live beyond a second story level..we wish you the best. Really we do. :buddies:

http://forums.somd.com/survey/252420-jpc-welfare-fraud-case.html#post4893805

Seriously though...how do you think I achieved the official JPC "rich and pampered" status, eh Jimmy? And why didn't you achieve it also? Hmm?

WTF are you talking about?

"Rich" with 3 dollar bills isn't rich. DUCY?

Pssst Gilligans island was just a TV show, they weren't real.

I liked Maryanne, I think she was real
I really did not like Ginger, but I think that considering the time frame that the show was made, I suspect hers were real too.
don't really care to discuss Mrs. Howles realness,, that would just be gross.. almost as gross as when Thurston called her Lovey... Just saying.

I liked Maryanne, I think she was real
I really did not like Ginger, but I think that considering the time frame that the show was made, I suspect hers were real too.
don't really care to discuss Mrs. Howles realness,, that would just be gross.. almost as gross as when Thurston called her Lovey... Just saying.

The skipper had them all beat in that department :killingme

I really would have been a very rich person myself if I had not had my own catastrophes happen to me along my way

:coffee:

Gee, can you spare a dime for a burger today? I will gladly pay you back on Tues.

The skipper had them all beat in that department :killingme

Funny thing, the skipper never really held my interest like Maryann did.. go figure.

D.C. Democrats are no friend of the poor and middle class | RedState (http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/08/15/d-c-democrats-are-no-friend-of-the-poor-and-middle-class/)

D.C. Democrats are no friend of the poor and middle class


Adding insult to injury, Democrats have refused to admit the obvious lessons of history and their continued advocacy of proven failed high tax, business regulation and welfare policies that create poverty and their false cries against Republicans as racists that don’t care about the poor.