PDA

View Full Version : Still LOVE my SKINS!!!


STAYATHOMEMAMA3
10-15-2009, 02:12 PM
To all my fellow Redskin Fans....


YouTube - 2009 Chris Paul Redskins Remix : Week 6 "Standing Strong" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNK47XFQEjM)

dolemite
10-15-2009, 02:30 PM
To all my fellow Redskin Fans....


YouTube - 2009 Chris Paul Redskins Remix : Week 6 "Standing Strong" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNK47XFQEjM)

i am still a believer but something has to give. :buddies:

BuddyLee
10-15-2009, 03:32 PM
Wish they had a rock version.:lol:

Beta84
10-15-2009, 03:59 PM
Standing strong? Obviously we're not talkin about the Skins here.

smilin
10-15-2009, 04:03 PM
GREAT Franchise -though the team isn't so hot.
Go Skins...
:buddies:

STAYATHOMEMAMA3
10-15-2009, 04:07 PM
i am still a believer but something has to give. :buddies:



I agree, it really is disheartning to see a team I have followed since birth bascially fall apart this way!! Bottom line, I dont plan on too much happening this year. I think they just need to rebuild from the bottom up!! Maybe in the next few years we will have our beloved skins back... here's hopin:buddies:

PsyOps
10-18-2009, 09:05 AM
I agree, it really is disheartning to see a team I have followed since birth bascially fall apart this way!! Bottom line, I dont plan on too much happening this year. I think they just need to rebuild from the bottom up!! Maybe in the next few years we will have our beloved skins back... here's hopin:buddies:

Sorry, disagree. They need to rebuild from the TOP DOWN; starting with Snyder. I will never be the fan I used to be as long as Snyder owns that team.

Larry Gude
10-18-2009, 09:38 AM
To all my fellow Redskin Fans....


YouTube - 2009 Chris Paul Redskins Remix : Week 6 "Standing Strong" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNK47XFQEjM)

They're not our Skins anymore.


Every team deals with free agency so, it is impossible to have 'your' team like it used to be when you pretty much knew everyone's name on the team because it changed slowly, year by year.

Gibbs, the second time around, talked alot about 'core Redskins' to try and address this. However, talking about it and the reality of it tend to be two different things.

It would be interesting to see how we compare to the league average in terms of how we were built; how many draft picks and undrafted free agents, team by team? How many key free agents? Average length your players have been on your team.

Continuity is key in football or any pro team where the goal is to earn and keep fans, long term. It's easy these days to be a fan of pro football and enjoy how the various better teams and up and comers are doing. In the past, I hated everyone but us. Now, I'm just a football fan and less and less a Redskins fan and it's because of the turnover, the bad choices, the Keystone Cop-ness of it all.

Larry Gude
10-18-2009, 09:39 AM
Sorry, disagree. They need to rebuild from the TOP DOWN; starting with Snyder. I will never be the fan I used to be as long as Snyder owns that team.

Who they hell is 'they' if 'they' need to rebuild from the owner on down?

:lol:

PsyOps
10-18-2009, 11:48 AM
Who they hell is 'they' if 'they' need to rebuild from the owner on down?

:lol:

Since Snottie took control I'd hardly call THEY the Redskins. I'm really not sure what I want to call THEY except for........... THEY LOSERS!

:boo:

Peter Forsberg
10-18-2009, 02:36 PM
To all my fellow Redskin Fans....


YouTube - 2009 Chris Paul Redskins Remix : Week 6 "Standing Strong" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNK47XFQEjM)

If you really loved them you would be in one of those thousands of empty seats at FEDEX today.

BuddyLee
10-18-2009, 02:37 PM
Love the team, hate the organization.

BuddyLee
10-18-2009, 02:41 PM
If you really loved them you would be in one of those thousands of empty seats at FEDEX today.
That's like saying you'd be in Oakland if you loved yours.

Fat chance.:lol:

Peter Forsberg
10-18-2009, 03:10 PM
That's like saying you'd be in Oakland if you loved yours.

Fat chance.:lol: I guess staying home watching paint dry is prolly better then being at this boring game.

BuddyLee
10-18-2009, 03:12 PM
I guess staying home watching paint dry is prolly better then being at this boring game.
So you see my point.:lmao:

Too bad they don't have a game on FOX. All these good games on too.

Peter Forsberg
10-18-2009, 03:16 PM
So you see my point.:lmao:

Too bad they don't have a game on FOX. All these good games on too.OK... U got me this time. :buddies: Yeah I would love to see the G-Man lose.

huntr1
10-18-2009, 03:34 PM
:yahoo:

Peter Forsberg
10-18-2009, 04:14 PM
:yahoo:Who is 3rd string? Hunter the Punter?

BuddyLee
10-18-2009, 04:15 PM
Who is 3rd string? Hinter the Punter?
Randel El I believe.

Peter Forsberg
10-18-2009, 04:24 PM
Randel El I believe.Is the Oakland game on? :killingme

BuddyLee
10-18-2009, 04:24 PM
Is the Oakland game on? :killingme
45 minutes...

Beta84
10-19-2009, 08:43 AM
Randel El I believe.

Skins got rid of Colt Brennan? That makes sense. You've got a questionable starter and an old fart craptastic backup. Maybe they should have a 3rd string project that could be developed into a serviceable player.

angelbaby
10-19-2009, 09:57 AM
Skins got rid of Colt Brennan? That makes sense. You've got a questionable starter and an old fart craptastic backup. Maybe they should have a 3rd string project that could be developed into a serviceable player.


He was placed on injured reserve.

Larry Gude
10-19-2009, 09:59 AM
Skins got rid of Colt Brennan? That makes sense. You've got a questionable starter and an old fart craptastic backup. Maybe they should have a 3rd string project that could be developed into a serviceable player.

QB is not THE problem. The O line is THE problem.

Pete
10-19-2009, 10:03 AM
QB is not THE problem. The O line is THE problem.

I disagree and agree. I think the O-line is deficient BUT I believe if Campbell was given an hour in the pocket per pass play he would still be undecided and confused and over/under throw it.

Larry Gude
10-19-2009, 10:13 AM
I disagree and agree. I think the O-line is deficient BUT I believe if Campbell was given an hour in the pocket per pass play he would still be undecided and confused and over/under throw it.

Jason Campbell is NOT a good quarterback but he is capable. That said, his skill set has been a known component for at least all of last year and was made stark when he went down against the Bears two years ago and Collins INSTANTLY started making the O click.

So, the Skins made the decision off season Jason was it, end of story. We live with it. He's OK with a solid line, maybe even playoffs. Maybe. If the line was solid we'd be 3-3, maybe 4-2 just because of a few more field goals we've lost to sacks or rushed plays.

All I am arguing is that the PRIMARY problem is a line featuring two guys right now who wouldn't be back ups for anyone, Williams and Heyer and, Rinehart and Montgomery who'd likely only be back ups.

I mean, name one thing we did well from week one? What do we do? Throw deep? Screen? Solid running game? Slant passes? We've got no identity to fall back on, no things we do great to help get by as good teams do.

The whole season was bet on the old guys holding up one more year, which isn't unthinkable, and the D being super good, not just top 10.

The line is in shambles and the D is good but not great. Zorn can't fix that. Lewis can't. No one can in this day and age. After the Raiders win yesterday, it's not hard seeing us go 0 for the rest of the year. :shrug:

Every team starts with it's lines, O and D. That still hasn't changed.

kom526
10-19-2009, 11:59 AM
Do they dare try and re sign Chase Daniel who is currently on the NO practice squad as a just in case? I mean if it gets to Randle El he won't be able to signal fair catch to avoid being hit.

angelbaby
10-19-2009, 02:18 PM
What I don't understand is why do the Redskins always play to the caliber of their opponent? We played the Giants (who are a great team) and kept right up with them. Look at the points they have scored on their other opponents. If the Redskins were such a bad team wouldnt they have scored 30 or more points on us? (I'm not defending them, I'm asking the question). Then we played the Rams, Lions, Bucs, Panthers, and Chiefs none of which are great teams. Yet we struggled. Next week we play the Eagles. If we come out and play to their caliber (before the Raiders debacle) then my point is proven. I just personally don't understand it.

cattitude
10-19-2009, 02:24 PM
What I don't understand is why do the Redskins always play to the caliber of their opponent? We played the Giants (who are a great team) and kept right up with them. Look at the points they have scored on their other opponents. If the Redskins were such a bad team wouldnt they have scored 30 or more points on us? (I'm not defending them, I'm asking the question). Then we played the Rams, Lions, Bucs, Panthers, and Chiefs none of which are great teams. Yet we struggled. Next week we play the Eagles. If we come out and play to their caliber (before the Raiders debacle) then my point is proven. I just personally don't understand it.

They get lucky...

I'm telling ya, Snyder is the problem.

ItalianScallion
10-19-2009, 02:31 PM
Then we played the Rams, Lions, Bucs, Panthers, and Chiefs none of which are great teams. Yet we struggled. Next week we play the Eagles. If we come out and play to their caliber (before the Raiders debacle) then my point is proven. I just personally don't understand it.
The above teams were overheard asking if the NFL could rearrange the rest of their schedule so they could play the skins every Sunday...:yahoo:
I told a friend that the coaches should put the player's paychecks in the end zone. This would give them incentive to get there.
NO team making that kind of money should ever be less than .500 in a year. Readjust their salary to be based on points and wins/losses then watch how they play...I've given up totally on pro football. I was a big fan until Norv Turner came to town.

BuddyLee
10-19-2009, 07:44 PM
Do they dare try and re sign Chase Daniel who is currently on the NO practice squad as a just in case? I mean if it gets to Randle El he won't be able to signal fair catch to avoid being hit.
He was cut I'm pretty sure.

Beta84
10-19-2009, 07:52 PM
He was placed on injured reserve.
that sucks

QB is not THE problem. The O line is THE problem.
QB is A problem, even though the OL is THE problem. Campbell would be serviceable if he had a line that could block for him and a running game.

What I don't understand is why do the Redskins always play to the caliber of their opponent? We played the Giants (who are a great team) and kept right up with them. Look at the points they have scored on their other opponents. If the Redskins were such a bad team wouldnt they have scored 30 or more points on us? (I'm not defending them, I'm asking the question). Then we played the Rams, Lions, Bucs, Panthers, and Chiefs none of which are great teams. Yet we struggled. Next week we play the Eagles. If we come out and play to their caliber (before the Raiders debacle) then my point is proven. I just personally don't understand it.

They don't play to their opponent. They just have a good defense, so they're always in the game to some extent.


SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.