Best Buy "Re-stocking" Fee

[SamSpade]

We had a fun time last night - this time, at Best Buy.

My wife's 35mm camera died a few years back - so I ponied up some big bucks to get her a new one this year (among other things) with the whole thing - zoom lens, etc. Anyway, turns out she learns her old camera is actually NOT BROKEN - so she decides she wants to return the camera. I dig around and find the receipt, and gleefully - NOT - stand in the very long line for returns. I watch patiently - NOT - as the three attendants do just about anything but actually wait on people.

I learn that - regardless of who returns the gift - they will charge a *RESTOCKING* fee for certain big ticket gifts - unless they are defective (in which case, it is implied, they will refund the full price).

WORSE - it's 15% of the item cost. This means to return a 350 dollar camera - they're gonna CHARGE me 50 bucks to put it back on the shelf!

What's ironic is, if I'd just gone out to the parking lot and dropped the thing on the pavement - there'd be no argument. "Defective" items are refunded without argument.

What's the deal with this crap? If I'd actually bought the *900* dollar camera I'd planned to buy, and it was being returned - I'd be paying 135 bucks "re-stocking" charge. This is ridiculous. Of course, it IS written in the fine print on the back of the receipt, but until they change this absurd policy, I don't intend on EVER returning to Best Buy.

[Dougstermd (Premo)]

Originally Posted by SamSpade

We had a fun time last night - this time, at Best Buy.

My wife's 35mm camera died a few years back - so I ponied up some big bucks to get her a new one this year (among other things) with the whole thing - zoom lens, etc. Anyway, turns out she learns her old camera is actually NOT BROKEN - so she decides she wants to return the camera. I dig around and find the receipt, and gleefully - NOT - stand in the very long line for returns. I watch patiently - NOT - as the three attendants do just about anything but actually wait on people.

I learn that - regardless of who returns the gift - they will charge a *RESTOCKING* fee for certain big ticket gifts - unless they are defective (in which case, it is implied, they will refund the full price).

WORSE - it's 15% of the item cost. This means to return a 350 dollar camera - they're gonna CHARGE me 50 bucks to put it back on the shelf!

What's ironic is, if I'd just gone out to the parking lot and dropped the thing on the pavement - there'd be no argument. "Defective" items are refunded without argument.

What's the deal with this crap? If I'd actually bought the *900* dollar camera I'd planned to buy, and it was being returned - I'd be paying 135 bucks "re-stocking" charge. This is ridiculous. Of course, it IS written in the fine print on the back of the receipt, but until they change this absurd policy, I don't intend on EVER returning to Best Buy.

best Buy = best buy somewhere else.
its always been in there fine print

[aps45819 (Premo)]

Most stores do this. Before they can put the item up for resale it has to be checked and inventoried. The store can either raise all their prices to cover the cost or just charge the folks that are incuring the cost.

[mainman (Premo)]

Originally Posted by SamSpade

We had a fun time last night - this time, at Best Buy.

My wife's 35mm camera died a few years back - so I ponied up some big bucks to get her a new one this year (among other things) with the whole thing - zoom lens, etc. Anyway, turns out she learns her old camera is actually NOT BROKEN - so she decides she wants to return the camera. I dig around and find the receipt, and gleefully - NOT - stand in the very long line for returns. I watch patiently - NOT - as the three attendants do just about anything but actually wait on people.

I learn that - regardless of who returns the gift - they will charge a *RESTOCKING* fee for certain big ticket gifts - unless they are defective (in which case, it is implied, they will refund the full price).

WORSE - it's 15% of the item cost. This means to return a 350 dollar camera - they're gonna CHARGE me 50 bucks to put it back on the shelf!

What's ironic is, if I'd just gone out to the parking lot and dropped the thing on the pavement - there'd be no argument. "Defective" items are refunded without argument.

What's the deal with this crap? If I'd actually bought the *900* dollar camera I'd planned to buy, and it was being returned - I'd be paying 135 bucks "re-stocking" charge. This is ridiculous. Of course, it IS written in the fine print on the back of the receipt, but until they change this absurd policy, I don't intend on EVER returning to Best Buy.

Did you actually return the item? Is it the same if you purchase online?

[workin hard]

Target is doing the same thing for electronics...I heard it on the radio Monday.

[SamSpade]

Originally Posted by mainman

Did you actually return the item? Is it the same if you purchase online?

After arguing with the clerk - it turned out they did NOT do this for film cameras. She would have otherwise charged me when their own policy didn't require it, because she didn't look at the camera.

Still - I see no reason to purchase anything else at their store, knowing that a return is going to COST ME MONEY. That's a strong disincentive to buying from them.

Plus, I don't see the point in doing this for electronic items - at a store that SPECIALIZES IN ELECTRONICS. I don't for a minute buy the concept that returns - *especially* at Christmas - are anything but a cost of doing business. Small businesses get to write these costs off - but for some reason, big franchises are deciding to stick it to the consumer?

Further, they do this based on the item - which means, if it's a *gift*, you're getting screwed because of what was given to you - if they bought you a suede jacket - you get your money's worth. If they buy you a computer - screw you. I'm not buying it at all. The item is unused, with the original receipt and the unopened box. It's a completely ridiculous policy.

I also don't buy the cost idea, either. Most of these stores boast they won't be "undersold" and will match or beat any competitor's price - but I'm supposed to believe that they are recouping the cost of their sales by ramping up the costs of returns, after Christmas?

I guess I'll just do business with the places that DON'T charge these fees, especially ones that are based on the COST OF THE ITEM. I *might* understand a fee of 20 bucks - but 15% of the item cost? That means it costs a few hundred bucks to re-stock a computer?

[SamSpade]

Originally Posted by workin hard

Target is doing the same thing for electronics...I heard it on the radio Monday.

I think people should complain. I can see no practical reason for this, except that electronics cost more, and it makes more money than charging a percentage of small-ticket items like hats, gloves and books.

[Oz (Premo)]

Originally Posted by SamSpade

Small businesses get to write these costs off - but for some reason, big franchises are deciding to stick it to the consumer?

What makes you say that small businesses write off these costs? And, exactly how and where do they write them off?

I don't mean to be confrontational. But I do think your statement is inaccurate, and that small businesses are just better at servicing their customers.

[SamSpade]

Originally Posted by Oz

What makes you say that small businesses write off these costs? And, exactly how and where do they write them off?

I don't mean to be confrontational. But I do think your statement is inaccurate, and that small businesses are just better at servicing their customers.

It may be - I was under the impression that business losses due to returns were a tax write-off - but I can't confirm that. I can't confirm it, so I'll just take it back.

I've been reading about this - different companies have had differing luck with "re-stocking" fees. Most of the folks online I've read from, including Best Buy employees have confirmed, this is strictly to prevent "loaners" - people who 'buy' something for short-term use, and return it for full price. Say, a student who buys a lap-top, uses it for a weekend and brings it back after they've written their term paper.

But this is famously done by people - with CLOTHES, and JEWELRY - and I hear of no such complaint. Of course, with those items, there's no concern about being "opened" - we all understand that any item off the shelf in the department store MAY have been tried on several times before WE bought it. But Best Buy has to consider marking down an item that has been opened and repackaged. (I say "consider" because that is ALSO the rationale behind the fee - that returned items that are not defective COST them money, because they must now re-sell them for reduced price and there's nothing wrong with them. However - in all the years I've shopped at Best Buy or Circuit City or any such store that has or had this policy - I've never seen a mark-down for a previously opened package. In fact, I've certainly seen stuff on the shelf that definitely looks as though someone has opened it, whether on the floor or as a return.)

I just think the concept is lame - my wife has told me she wants a different iPod accessory than the one she received - but if THAT's one of the items they covered - *I'm* getting socked with the cost, because they have to restock it.

I've learned there are a few stores - like Costco - that never have these fees.

[Stirituprebel]

Target has been doing this for a few years now. You have to be careful when buying electronics from them and make sure it is what you want. I got a camcorder from my wife two years ago for christmas. I did not want it and took it back to target where she bought it. They wanted to charge a restocking fee. After arguing with the clerk and the store manager, we called the nationwide customer service number, the regional office then called the store and finally they refunded our money at full price. So if this does happen to you, don't give up, follow the chain of command and with persistance you will prevail.