50% of women would give up sex for money

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

I wonder if this is the companion survey to the one that says men would give up money for sex?

[desertrat (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Misfit

Women would give up sex and time if it meant they could save money: survey - NY Daily News

Sounds like a bad deal for their partners.

More than 50% of women said they would give up sex for six months if it meant saving $2,500, according to a survey.

All You magazine questioned 2,600 women between the ages of 21 and 59 and found that bargains loom large — even in the bedroom.

So who would offer that? What a meaningless survey.

[MMDad]

Originally Posted by SoMDGirl42

I've been single for three years and I'm not a whore. It's not worth it.

Didn't say you were, but a healthy sex life doesn't make anyone a whore.

Or were you calling me a whore?

[bcp (Premo)]

Originally Posted by MMDad

Didn't say you were, but a healthy sex life doesn't make anyone a whore.

Or were you calling me a whore?

Not calling you anything but,
whores charge
sluts give it up for free.

Just wanted to clear that up.
If I were single and not ugly, I would be a slut.

[SoMDGirl42]

Originally Posted by MMDad

Didn't say you were, but a healthy sex life doesn't make anyone a whore.

Or were you calling me a whore?

My priorities are raising my daughter, instilling good values on her. I am not willing to enjoy a healthy sex life with just any man. I am not willing to have a revolving door of men around her, so therefore I will not subject her to that. If the right man comes along, fine, but I'm not making that my priority, SHE is my priority and if that means sacrificing for her, I will.

[MMDad]

Originally Posted by SoMDGirl42

My priorities are raising my daughter, instilling good values on her. I am not willing to enjoy a healthy sex life with just any man. I am not willing to have a revolving door of men around her, so therefore I will not subject her to that. If the right man comes along, fine, but I'm not making that my priority, SHE is my priority and if that means sacrificing for her, I will.

No need to explain. I applaud your focus. I was joking, but it must not have come across as such. Sawry.

[SoMDGirl42]

Originally Posted by MMDad

No need to explain. I applaud your focus. I was joking, but it must not have come across as such. Sawry.

No worries. I'm cool with the decicions I've made. I joke about it too. I've just seen too many women who think they NEED a man and parade them in and out of their childs life. I don't want to be that person.

[Pete]

Conversely I wonder if they would have sex for 6 months for $2500.

Interesting concept, a sex contract. You meet, approve of each other, negotiate a contract for 6 months and go for it.

[Toxick]

Originally Posted by Pete

Conversely I wonder if they would have sex for 6 months for $2500.

You have to get the semantics straight.

Most women don't have sex for money. That's prostitution.
Most women have sex for access to money. That's a relationship.




Subtle difference, but under the law, it's the difference between tax exemptions and jail time..

[FED_UP]

Originally Posted by Toxick

You have to get the semantics straight.

Most women don't have sex for money. That's prostitution.
Most women have sex for access to money. That's a relationship.




Subtle difference, but under the law, it's the difference between tax exemptions and jail time..

So if she gives him sex and he has no money, would that be a thanks boo, IOU.