Parenting Police.

[missperky (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Beelzebaby666

ED ZACHARY!!!!
I was looking at a cost of $1578 a month for EACH child.

THat doesn't include vacations, extras, or any of my own personal costs.

JPC is more effed up than Polio

If I had some rope and a good hiding spot.......

I'm taking my kids back.

I'm sure we can think of a spot...

[Beelzebaby666]

PARENTING POLICE


There wouldn't be a need, if there weren't a need...

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by Pandora

Oh, I see. So if I run up a debt to American Express screw them because they are a big ass company that can afford the loss?

Makes sense. It all makes sense. I don't know why I didn't see it before.

Actually that is very true. No sarcasm to it.

The credit companies are not allowed to harass people for money and the people certainly do not go to jail for a credit card debt.

The injustice is only in the unjust child support laws.

[missperky (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Actually that is very true. No sarcasm to it.

The credit companies are not allowed to harass people for money and the people certainly do not go to jail for a credit card debt.

The injustice is only in the unjust child support laws.

Since when?

[Pandora (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Actually that is very true. No sarcasm to it.

The credit companies are not allowed to harass people for money and the people certainly do not go to jail for a credit card debt.

The injustice is only in the unjust child support laws.

It depends on how they ran that debt up. I will guarantee that it isn’t uncommon for debtors to garnish wages.

Anyway, there is no judge in the world that would put a man in jail for child support if he was TRYING..............

There was a lesson I learned as a child. It is easy to just do the task than it is to sit around and biatch and complain about it.

If you put half the effort in a job as you do in playing a victim, you wouldn't have had these problems.

[Airgasm (Premo)]

Scofflaw and Personal Responsibility.

Enough!!! Live what you preach...

[hvp05 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

This scenerio shows that it has nothing to do with providing for children,

That was not a "scenario"; scenarios need to be dramatizations of actual events, or at least hypotheticals based on actual events.

All you did was pull random crap out of your nose and claim it as possible. Can you link to a case that supports your assertions? Good luck in that search...

Originally Posted by JPC sr

the child support is only attacking and punishing the parents for nothing.

Another unsubstantiated assertion. You never have adequately explained why the government would needlessly go after people if they've done "nothing" wrong. Do judges think it's fun, or funny?

Originally Posted by JPC sr

And the law only puts poor and impoverished parents into jail for child support even while the children are in need of nothing.

Nor have you ever adequately explained why a custodial parent should resort to welfare - thereby using taxpayer money - to fill the gap created by the non-custodial parent.


And you never will.

[buddy999]

Originally Posted by Beelzebaby666

http://www.babycenter.com/costofchild/

Based on the information in the website from the link above, I used EXCEL to compute what it would have cost JPC to raise his son given his son's birth year of 1977. The results are based on an average cost of living increase of 3.80%. Here are the results:

Year: 1977
Total Cost: $134,050.00
Percent Increase Cost of Living: 3.80%
Cost Per Year: $7,447.22
Yearly Cost Per Parent: $3,723.61
Monthly Cost Per Parent: $310.30

These results allow the child to attend a state college.

JPC may have had to sacrifice a little but I think even he could have come up with $310 a month.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Why must the poor pay the rich ? when the rich do not need the money ? and the poor can not live without it ?

You stated in your first post that paying child support was punishing to the parent. Why do you feel that providing child support (any child support) is a punishment. Forget the <1% of people that fit into the 10 mil vs. 20 hours at min wage group, let's go with the 85% of people that make roughly equal amounts - or, at the very least do not have such a huge disparity in wages as 10 million dollars. So, the question is, why is it punishing for a parent to provide for their child?

[donbarzini]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Child support is not really based on what the custodials make.

The legal formulas and procedures talk about the income of both parents but it is just another one of many deceptions in the unjust child support system. The Courts put down the custodials income but it always only boils down to how much can be taken from the separated parents.

Like if the cusodial (male or female) makes 10 million dollars a year and the separated parent only makes minimum wage on a part time 20 hour week job, then the child support takes by force from the dirt poor parent and gives it to the rich even though it is a great disparity and an injustice.

That is what the unjust child support does and the thievery is by brute force.

This scenerio shows that it has nothing to do with providing for children,

the child support is only attacking and punishing the parents for nothing.

It is not for supporting children but only as a form of parenting police.

And the law only puts poor and impoverished parents into jail for child support even while the children are in need of nothing.

The fundamental foundation of child support is a fraud.

Perhaps you didn't hear me in the other thread. I said: "Shut Up!"