Parenting Police.

[MMDad]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

The legal formulas and procedures talk about the income of both parents but it is just another one of many deceptions in the unjust child support system. The Courts put down the custodials income but it always only boils down to how much can be taken from the separated parents.

Wow, you're really working for the title of village idiot toady, aren't you?

In your "scenario", if we assume that the non-custodial is like you and totally abandoned their child, the monthly obligation would be 60 cents. Your claim that the child support is not based on the income of the custodial parent is yet another bald faced lie.

There are only two options here. Either you are so stupid that you are unable to recognize how wrong you are, or you do know the truth and you choose to lie. I believe that you are just morally corrupt and not capable of telling the truth, but it could be that you are just stupid.

[sanchezf (Premo)]

Is there a MD website to show how the calculate for child support.
ex: this parent makes , that parent makes so child support is blank a month?

[MMDad]

Originally Posted by sanchezf

Is there a MD website to show how the calculate for child support.
ex: this parent makes , that parent makes so child support is blank a month?

http://www.dhr.state.md.us/csea/worksheet.htm

[sanchezf (Premo)]

Originally Posted by MMDad

http://www.dhr.state.md.us/csea/worksheet.htm

Exactly what I was looking for. THANKS

[pixiegirl]

Originally Posted by MMDad

Wow, you're really working for the title of village idiot toady, aren't you?

In your "scenario", if we assume that the non-custodial is like you and totally abandoned their child, the monthly obligation would be 60 cents. Your claim that the child support is not based on the income of the custodial parent is yet another bald faced lie.

There are only two options here. Either you are so stupid that you are unable to recognize how wrong you are, or you do know the truth and you choose to lie. I believe that you are just morally corrupt and not capable of telling the truth, but it could be that you are just stupid.

A-freaking-men. Child support is set using a guideline and then a fairly simple equation. There is a worksheet that states the guideline based on the income brought into the household when both parent are together. For example, if I make 60K a year and baby daddy makes 40K, the total income is 100K a year so you use the guidelines to look up what the support for a child is per month in a household that makes 100K a year. We'll say it's $1000. Child support is then set for each parent based on the percent of income each parent brought into the household. Using my numbers from above, I would be responsible for 60% of that $1000 and daddy for 40%; ie. me $600 and him $400. Since the child lives with me of course I don't have to pay myself support.

MD has one of the fairest systems I've ever seen and what proves it is, given the above numbers if custody of the child shifted and the daddy had custody the numbers would remain the same. I'd be paying him $600 a month.

Of course all of the above numbers were just a crude example but you get the point.

[Ken King (Premo)]

Originally Posted by pixiegirl

Of course all of the above numbers were just a crude example but you get the point.

Everyone gets the point but the one with the pointed head.

[sanchezf (Premo)]

Ok give me some feed back.

Kids 10 and 6 go to private school (because thats what Mother wants) father does not want them in private school due to financial cost. Will the court system say it's a way of life so they get to stay in private school and he has to pay or if thats what the mother wants she can pay for it.

[pixiegirl]

Originally Posted by sanchezf

Ok give me some feed back.

Kids 10 and 6 go to private school (because thats what Mother wants) father does not want them in private school due to financial cost. Will the court system say it's a way of life so they get to stay in private school and he has to pay or if thats what the mother wants she can pay for it.

Were they in private school prior to the break-up?

[Tinkerbell]

Originally Posted by sanchezf

Ok give me some feed back.

Kids 10 and 6 go to private school (because thats what Mother wants) father does not want them in private school due to financial cost. Will the court system say it's a way of life so they get to stay in private school and he has to pay or if thats what the mother wants she can pay for it.

I don't know what the court actually does, but IMO they should only make the non-custodial parent pay child support based upon the child attending public school. If the custodial parent wants to put the kids in private school anyway and the non-custodial parent is against that, then the custodial parent can go ahead and put them in private school, but have to foot the bill themselves, since they had public school available, but chose not to use it.

[Ken King (Premo)]

Originally Posted by sanchezf

Ok give me some feed back.

Kids 10 and 6 go to private school (because thats what Mother wants) father does not want them in private school due to financial cost. Will the court system say it's a way of life so they get to stay in private school and he has to pay or if thats what the mother wants she can pay for it.

Actually if they have been in the private school system the court typically leaves them there and recognizes that as a usual expense for the family.