Jimmy

[This_person]

JPC, you've said you don't like it when I PM you, you want all people to be able to get the wisdom of your words. So, instead of responding to you in PM, I'll post here what my answer is to your last:

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I stand by my comments and all my post.

If you have some thing to say then say it but I already said my piece.

Other posters were going 4 pages but you put your beligerant personal affronts and the thread comes to a stop.

It does not make you right, it makes so you shut out other posters and you stop any real communications from continuing.

I am asking that we keep our postings on a mature adult level and stop the personal attacks.

I stand by all that I wrote and I do not need any "back up" as you keep demanding. If you have some "back up" then you post it but quit badgering the dead questions as other people are trying to discuss the issue respectfully.

You do NOT stand by your posts, as you will not answer scrutiny to your statements. I am not badgering you, I am asking:

Why is it punishment, as you stated, to provide for your child? You've not answered that though you stated it.

What is the pathological condition you state that custodial parents who feel ill will towards their non-supporting co-parents have? You stated that they have it, explain what it is.

Why do you think your posts are accurate when people who have actual experiences and knowledge of which they speak disagree with you?

Why are you talking about courts deciding where children go to school when the discussion revolves around deciding how that question would be paid for, not whether it should happen?

These are just the most recent questions you refuse to answer as "badgering" and "beligerant". They are neither, they are actual questions relating to your statements.

Again, if you can't handle the heat of having your statements discussed, don't make inaccurate statements.

[carie_47421]

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

I am asking:

Why is it punishment, as you stated, to provide for your child? You've not answered that though you stated it.

The child support system and its laws are wrong and unjust, which has absolutely nothing to do with the children. Thus parents are "punished" for not obeying the unjust laws and not anything concerning the children.

If you can not understand that then its your problem and not mine.

Originally Posted by This_person

What is the pathological condition you state that custodial parents who feel ill will towards their non-supporting co-parents have? You stated that they have it, explain what it is.

I said the codependency that the custodial degrading the separated parents puts onto the children. That codependency is put onto the children whether the custodial were codependant too or not.

Originally Posted by This_person

Why do you think your posts are accurate when people who have actual experiences and knowledge of which they speak disagree with you?

Because mine are correct and others are wrong.

Originally Posted by This_person

Why are you talking about courts deciding where children go to school when the discussion revolves around deciding how that question would be paid for, not whether it should happen?

I understand what I am saying and if you do not understand it then you could ask or just deal with your own ignorance.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

The child support system and its laws are wrong and unjust, which has absolutely nothing to do with the children. Thus parents are "punished" for not obeying the unjust laws and not anything concerning the children.

But, you haven't explained (regardless of the multitude of times I've asked) how providing for one's children (you know, following the law) is unjust. So, you're saying the punishment is for unjust laws, and the laws are unjust because they punish. Please fill in a thought here, as you don't really have one on record yet.

I said the codependency that the custodial degrading the separated parents puts onto the children. That codependency is put onto the children whether the custodial were codependant too or not.

And, I showed you the definition of codependancy is:a psychological condition or a relationship in which a person is controlled or manipulated by another who is affected with a pathological condition (as an addiction to alcohol or heroin). So, you're saying the custodial is manipulating the child, I get that. By the definition, what is the pathological condition of the custodial parent of which you speak. You are being asked to actually answer these questions, Jimmy, not just repeat the empty rhetoric you've already stated.

Because mine are correct and others are wrong.

You do realize that's like saying your opinion is more accurate than fact, right?

I understand what I am saying and if you do not understand it then you could ask or just deal with your own ignorance.

I'm asking. If you want to actually put some value into your answers, I'd greatly appreciate it! You've yet to answer a single thing from this long post, except that you believe yourself more than facts.

[Ponytail]

Originally Posted by This_person

...You've yet to answer a single thing from this long post, except that you believe yourself more than facts.

There's another definition for you to look up..." Sociopath".

Also good reading. Start with "The Sociopath Next Door" by Martha Stout for an eye opener, then maybe you too will be able to put this dolt on "ignore".

[This_person]

Lack of response. One more proof (of many) that - when confronted with his own words - JPC has no ability to stand behind his thoughts. EVEN HE can't accept what he says.

[Tinkerbell]

Originally Posted by This_person

Lack of response. One more proof (of many) that - when confronted with his own words - JPC has no ability to stand behind his thoughts. EVEN HE can't accept what he says.

I used to post threads about different issues other than child support just to see where he stands on those issues. See, the child support issue with him is like so I don't even discuss that with him anymore. I figured, maybe he'll make sense on other issues. Nope, turns out he's just as crazy on other issues too. So now I rarely even post to him anymore. It's an act of futility.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by Tinkerbell

I used to post threads about different issues other than child support just to see where he stands on those issues. See, the child support issue with him is like so I don't even discuss that with him anymore. I figured, maybe he'll make sense on other issues. Nope, turns out he's just as crazy on other issues too. So now I rarely even post to him anymore. It's an act of futility.

The two threads you started that affronted me went 4 pages and the other went 14 pages, so I say you done alright.

Fowers

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

The two threads you started that affronted me went 4 pages and the other went 14 pages, so I say you done alright.

Fowers

Instead of being affronted, have you considered that maybe you might be wrong, like 99% of people believe you to be? Maybe people are just trying to help you be a good person! Instead of being defensive, LEARN.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

The child support system and its laws are wrong and unjust, which has absolutely nothing to do with the children. Thus parents are "punished" for not obeying the unjust laws and not anything concerning the children.

Jimmy, no single raindrop believes that IT is to blame for the flood. That's irresponsibility.

I believe you're a raindrop in the grand flood of life. A big, drippy, cold, sloppy raindrop, but a raindrop nonetheless. You choose your irresponsible lifestyle with no thought as to the consequense if others followed your beliefs. Indeed, you probably think you'd be a river.

You're not. You're a life destroying flood, ruining the crops of children, starting with your seed.

I implore you to think about what you're asking people to believe. Think of all the contradictions in your own thoughts. Think of the irresponsibility. Think of the train wreck your life has been, and the one you sh1t onto your son. If those thoughts don't make you suicidal, you're not trying hard enough.

I don't wish for your suicide. Don't get me wrong. Just for you to wake up to reality.