Embyo Stem Cells in MD.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by Angel

How about you use spell check before you start thinking you are brighter then the folks running the show?

This forum does not have a "spell check" on it, and most people accept a few spelling errors as part of the forum dynamics and not a big issue.

If there is some word(s) that you can not decifer or can not comprehend then just ask for a clarification in another post or in a private message and I am sure that anyone will help you to understand their words.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by Toxick

Well, I'm pro-life and I support embryonic stem cell research. But not because of the logic you present. I simply don't believe these embryos are human beings.

First I would want to put some hard controls on abortion like a 48 hour waiting period.

The wait makes so the Doctors and staff can not be pressuring the unfortunate parents into having an abortion in a hurry.

Plus I do not see it as restricting a woman's choice but rather I believe we need to restrict the Doctor's choices.

For parents to want to end their pregnancy is some thing I can sympathize with,

but the baby killing Doctors is what I find most disgusting,

particularly so because now they want to use the baby parts for embryo cell research.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by Toxick

Following the above logic to its extreme conclusion then we should have let the nazi's continue doing tests on human beings, on account'a the benefits reaped from such research could save innocent life.

That logic is very flawed because it is killing innocent life and so any benefit would only go to the guilty.

They are not innocent when they benefit from atrocities.

[Toxick]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

That logic is very flawed because it is killing innocent life and so any benefit would only go to the guilty.

They are not innocent when they benefit from atrocities.

Um...


Thank you?

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by Toxick

Um...

Thank you?

I see when T takes my words out of the post that it just does not look coherant even though they were when the words were in context - in the post showing a quote of his.

What I was saying is that Toxick was saying that the Nazi style research of killing babies that then he said it would benefit "innocent people" and save the lives of those "innocent people" by experimenting on and killing baby embryos.

Thus my point was that those are not "innocent people" when they benefit from atrocities - like killing babies.

[hvp05 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Thus my point was that those are not "innocent people" when they benefit from atrocities - like killing babies.

The same way all modern Americans hold part of the blame and should feel guilty about slavery, eh?

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by hvp05

The same way all modern Americans hold part of the blame and should feel guilty about slavery, eh?

When we accept the rightful blame and then repent and make ammends and then the guilt becomes insignificant and tolerable.

Like we do not ease the guild by accepting stolen money,

or making rich people healthier by killing poor babies,

or prospering while ignoring the lingering detriment still from the African slavery.

We do change the past through repentance and making ammends,

and when there is no repentance then the blame and guilt increases.