Solution for c/s.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

By the way, did you understand how your thinking was flawed as corrected here and here? You never commented or tried to correct my thinking, so I'm assuming you now understand that your philosophy is fatally flawed.

I understand your words and I do not like them at all.

I see your postings as beligerant and no real way for me to reply to such comments so I leave it like that.

You can believe whatever you want, as I go on about my business.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I understand your words and I do not like them at all.

I see your postings as beligerant and no real way for me to reply to such comments so I leave it like that.

You can believe whatever you want, as I go on about my business.

Not liking them is not really the point. I don't like it when I'm proven wrong, either. I have a hard time fighting when I'm proven wrong, too.

It would be nice, maybe even manly, of you to admit you're wrong.

You would gain great face.

[MMDad]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I do not know anything about this claim. Plus, even if I did it would not be my place to speak for my son. And he did go to c/s Court yesterday Monday and it went fine.

This is your definition of "it went fine?":

Defendant present for preliminary inquiry. Defendant advised of his rights and referred to the Public Defender's Office. Contempt Hearing scheduled for 9-24-07 @ 8:30 AM. Defendant ordered to appear. Referral filed.

He isn't paying child support, he's facing a contempt hearing, he's spending his money drinking and playing poker, and it's fine?

You are one sick SOB, Jimmy!

[Sharon (Premo)]

Originally Posted by MMDad

He isn't paying child support, he's facing a contempt hearing, he's spending his money drinking and playing poker, and it's fine?

You know...

All the children are fine and have all their needs met.

[RoseRed (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Sharon

You know...

All the children are fine and have all their needs met.

Well dur, everyone knows that...

[hvp05 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I see your postings as beligerant

Just like old times.

[Pushrod]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

:
I said, and still say, that since my son already had all those things in abundance then I did not send him any more, thus the answer is no.

Wait a minute here! You say your son had all the stuff he needed in abundance, did you supply him with this abundance or was your ex the one who had to dig deeper in her pockets to supply him? He had an abundance of food, clothing, shelter and utilities, how much of this did you supply? Any?
If you didn't you are one big POS!

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I understand your words and I do not like them at all.

I see your postings as beligerant and no real way for me to reply to such comments so I leave it like that.

You can believe whatever you want, as I go on about my business.

I've seen you on a bunch since you last posted this, yet you seem unable to come up with any response to my questions. Where are my facts wrong, Jimmy? Where's the beligerance?

You have "no real way to reply" because you're wrong. Just own up to it. Or, does truth always shut you up?








Many people have asked for your response to a lot of things, why are you avoiding this thread that YOU started?

[This_person]

Originally Posted by MMDad

This is your definition of "it went fine?":

He isn't paying child support, he's facing a contempt hearing, he's spending his money drinking and playing poker, and it's fine?

You are one sick SOB, Jimmy!

It must be a proud moment for them, as they describe how they're wasting the life they've created (their own children) until, of course, one realizes he IS one of those children.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by Pushrod

Wait a minute here! You say your son had all the stuff he needed in abundance, did you supply him with this abundance or was your ex the one who had to dig deeper in her pockets to supply him? He had an abundance of food, clothing, shelter and utilities, how much of this did you supply? Any?
If you didn't you are one big POS!

Well I think that is a very foolish opinion,

when a child has plenty of food, housing, clothes, everything in abundance,

then for the parent to give the child(ren) more of it would be wrong,

and to have gov forced laws that order parents to provide unneeded extras and useless luxuries is reprehensible.

If we let the parents provide all the child needs then the children will have all that the child needs.

It is a simple solution, get the parenting police out of the business and let the parents do their own parenting.

The child is reported to have everything the child needs and this poster calls the parent a "POS" and the children are completely fine.

Having such ignorant beliefs is one thing but turning it into unjust child support laws was an abuse of government.