Solution for c/s.

[JPC sr]

A lot of parents make this complaint that the child support is not being used for the children and I think the only solution would be to allow the separated parents to spend any and all of the "child support" directly onto the children.

Do not give the child support to the custodial because the custodial spends the money on whatever the custodial wants,

so then the separated parents can give child support to the child. I like this idea.

It would be equivolent to joint custody because both parents would be providing directly to the child(ren) and the c/s would stop being custodial support.

And this way the custodial would not have to account for anything since they would not touch the money.

This is a real solution for reforming the unjust child support system.

[Barnacle]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

A lot of parents make this complaint that the child support is not being used for the children and I think the only solution would be to allow the separated parents to spend any and all of the "child support" directly onto the children.

Do not give the child support to the custodial because the custodial spends the money on whatever the custodial wants,

so then the separated parents can give child support to the child. I like this idea.

It would be equivolent to joint custody because both parents would be providing directly to the child(ren) and the c/s would stop being custodial support.

And this way the custodial would not have to account for anything since they would not touch the money.

This is a real solution for reforming the unjust child support system.

And just exactly how would this be monitored?? And who would do the monitoring?

[Bird Dog]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

A lot of parents make this complaint that the child support is not being used for the children and I think the only solution would be to allow the separated parents to spend any and all of the "child support" directly onto the children.

If the child support money is not spent on the children, what money pays for their food, clothes, housing, and extra stuff.

I seen guys with high and low child support payments and in my book you still cannot raise a child properly even with the high payments.
Guy's need to quit biatching and just pay them.
JMHO

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by Barnacle

And just exactly how would this be monitored?? And who would do the monitoring?

I do not see why parents need monitoring for their own children by the big daddy gov.

We really need to get the gov out of the family business.

In a free society the parents take care of their own children by their own standards.

There is nothing to monitor unless there is a charge of criminal child abuse.

We do not need the gov monitoring the personal lives of our families.

[budman473]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

A lot of parents make this complaint that the child support is not being used for the children and I think the only solution would be to allow the separated parents to spend any and all of the "child support" directly onto the children.

Do not give the child support to the custodial because the custodial spends the money on whatever the custodial wants,

so then the separated parents can give child support to the child. I like this idea.

It would be equivolent to joint custody because both parents would be providing directly to the child(ren) and the c/s would stop being custodial support.

And this way the custodial would not have to account for anything since they would not touch the money.

This is a real solution for reforming the unjust child support system.

I have another solution for child support. Pay it numb nutz!!

[Roberta (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

A lot of parents make this complaint that the child support is not being used for the children and I think the only solution would be to allow the separated parents to spend any and all of the "child support" directly onto the children.

Do not give the child support to the custodial because the custodial spends the money on whatever the custodial wants,

so then the separated parents can give child support to the child. I like this idea.

It would be equivolent to joint custody because both parents would be providing directly to the child(ren) and the c/s would stop being custodial support.

And this way the custodial would not have to account for anything since they would not touch the money.

This is a real solution for reforming the unjust child support system.

I don't know why I am bothering to reply, but here goes........

Ok, so the custodial parent charges the child for rent, food, electric, phone, cable,water, cab fare, entertainment expences ect......
THAT IS PAYABLE FROM THE NON CUSTODIAL SUPPORT MONEY!
Same thing as child support!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by Roberta

I don't know why I am bothering to reply, but here goes........

Ok, so the custodial parent charges the child for rent, food, electric, phone, cable,water, cab fare, entertainment expences ect......
THAT IS PAYABLE FROM THE NON CUSTODIAL SUPPORT MONEY!
Same thing as child support!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I do not get how anyone can figure that the custodial can charge their own child for their upkeep?

I think the custodials have a lot of gaul to ask the separated parents to pay the custodial for the children.

The custodials wanting paid to care for their own children has got to be the biggest fraud in all history.

[czygvtwkr]

So what happens when the kid spends it all on gummy bears and video games?

[itsbob (Premo)]

So, if the custodial parent is not permitted to handle the child support money in any way, shape of form, how is the child supposed to get diapers, formula, clothes, and so forth? Just who is supposed to spend the child support money, and what are they permitted to buy, and when are they permitted to buy it?

[budman473]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I do not get how anyone can figure that the custodial can charge their own child for their upkeep?

I think the custodials have a lot of gaul to ask the separated parents to pay the custodial for the children.

The custodials wanting paid to care for their own children has got to be the biggest fraud in all history.

For crying out loud, he did not just say that did he? Why would the seperated parent NOT pay for the children? Oh wait that is a question he has been asked so many times. Jimbo you just don't get it. PARENTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR CHILDREN'S WELL BEING REGARDLESS IF THEY HAVE CUSTODY OR NOT.