Republicans for 5th District.

[hvp05 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

There is nothing "stupid" about me standing by my own words. And since I stand then no one has caught me because I am not running - I stand.

Yeah, you stand alright; one minute you're standing on one argument, and a few minutes later you're standing on another, all while never admitting the obvious, inherent flaws in all your arguments.

You admitted such here. I said you flip, twist, and change your argument every 20 seconds and you responded with, "That is exactly correct and it always amazes me that "hvp" seems to really know me and my message."

So you have already agreed that this perception is accurate, not mere "name-calling".

Besides, if anyone is name-calling at you... it's you! Your latest title is "Ferrous Canus, and Stupidus Giganticus," thus implying that you know you are stupid and are proudly advertising the fact.

Not the greatest characteristics for someone running for public office... public office carpet sweeper, even.

And I can't believe I just wasted the several minutes typing this.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

There is nothing "stupid" about me standing by my own words.

And since I stand then no one has caught me because I am not running - I stand.

That kind of name-calling has its limitations when it is not accurate.

Okay, then stand still. Answer it here, or in the other thread regarding this very thing you've said, and answer it. What was the importance of bringing up the word "white" to describe man? There was a reason you brought his race into your attack of him, what was it? Stand, don't run behind "I've already answered" or "I stand by all I say...." crap. Clearly, you haven't already answered, or people would know. Clearly, you're not standing, or you wouldn't be running to hide behind diversions and distractions. Stand. For once in your useless load on society of a life, stand up and explain yourself to all of us asking.















But, let's face it; as hvp already said, you'll never give a straight answer. You got caught being a self-loathing white person, and you'll run away from ever answering.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by hvp05

Besides, if anyone is name-calling at you... it's you! Your latest title is "Ferrous Canus, and Stupidus Giganticus," thus implying that you know you are stupid and are proudly advertising the fact.

That is a post title and it is not factually calling myself those names.

Like most of my titles it is from other posters' comments that I liked.

It use to be "Batman" but I did not consider myself to be Batman.

The names "Ferrous Canus, and Stupidus Giganticus," are latin words that have various translations.

1) Crazy Dog, and Stupid Giant.

or

2) Magnificant Star, and Roman Emporer.

or could be interpreted to mean

3) The best Democratic candidate for Maryland 5th District.

So name-calling one-self is not the same as others doing the name-calling and yet I got those names from other posters.

This is a funny forum indeed.

[hvp05 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

That is a post title and it is not factually calling myself those names.

That may be a valid point... if it were not proven by the fact that you admitted to "flipping, twisting, and changing" your arguments frequently. Nothing is more stupid than that - especially when you are running for an office where people need to understand what you believe in and support you.

But, of course, you glazed right over that in this most recent response, so I must believe you already know how stupid the admission was - you just want to glaze over it. Spineless cowards tend to act like that.

Similar to say... oh, how you are avoiding the question regarding your "white MAN" comment.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by hvp05

That may be a valid point... if it were not proven by the fact that you admitted to "flipping, twisting, and changing" your arguments frequently. Nothing is more stupid than that - especially when you are running for an office where people need to understand what you believe in and support you.

In an arguement it is necessary to constantly adjust (flip, twist, change) because I ajust untill I am correct even if that means changing over to the other side when the other side turns out to be correct.

To be inflexible or not flexible in an arguement is non-productive.

But my campaign platform has stayed the same and it is recorded on my website.

A couple times I have corrected the wording to be more politically correct but the message is still the same.

1) Pro-life. 2) Stop greed growth. 3) Human rights for all. 4) Reform child support.

Ancient Chinese proverb says: The great tree that does not bend for the wind will surely snap.

I am flexible in many regards and I mean to stay that way.

Originally Posted by hvp05

But, of course, you glazed right over that in this most recent response, so I must believe you already know how stupid the admission was - you just want to glaze over it. Spineless cowards tend to act like that.

It troubles me that so many people do not know what courage and cowardice really mean.

Being afraid and having fear is often times the wise thing to do, as the Wizard told to the Lion, link HERE.

Originally Posted by hvp05

Similar to say... oh, how you are avoiding the question regarding your "white MAN" comment.

I have answered it over and over and it is done.

There is no secret answer in being a male caucasoid.

[hvp05 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

In an arguement it is necessary to constantly adjust (flip, twist, change)

But that's not what you do, and that's not what I meant by using those terms... and you know it, as would any English-comprehending person after reading what I wrote.

Originally Posted by JPC sr

because I ajust untill I am correct even if that means changing over to the other side when the other side turns out to be correct.

You are funny today.

If the above was true you would no longer believe in #2, 3, and 4 (below); you probably would not even be here at all because, if you were honest, you would have admitted by now that the bulk of your 'platform' is a farce.

Originally Posted by JPC sr

2) Stop greed growth. 3) Human rights for all. 4) Reform child support.

Again, it has been proven by countless people using countless methods and countless facts why your belief in those things is inaccurate and plain dishonest.

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Being afraid and having fear is often times the wise thing to do, as the Wizard told to the Lion

And again you are admitting traits any voter should be weary of, but I would expect nothing less from you.

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I have answered it over and over and it is done.

Ugh.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

There is nothing "stupid" about me standing by my own words.

And since I stand then no one has caught me because I am not running - I stand.

That kind of name-calling has its limitations when it is not accurate.

But it is,it's very accurate. You have got to be the dumbest person I have ever seen.

[soul4sale]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

That means the man wanted the job very much and I say that is a positive aspect since most people do nothing but follow orders.

Let me reiterate for the thickies here. Collins Bailey had to buy his way onto the school board in Charles County after nearly getting stomped out in the primary round. That does not indicate a groundswell of support for him in the region's second most populous county.

The point I was making was not that Bailey is or is not committed to running against Hoyer. It is that he is hardly a fed-class candidate. And now he seems to have gone AWOL since his announcement, so maybe I need to make the point that he is just sacrificial lambing at this point.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by soul4sale

Let me reiterate for the thickies here. Collins Bailey had to buy his way onto the school board in Charles County after nearly getting stomped out in the primary round. That does not indicate a groundswell of support for him in the region's second most populous county.

The point I was making was not that Bailey is or is not committed to running against Hoyer. It is that he is hardly a fed-class candidate. And now he seems to have gone AWOL since his announcement, so maybe I need to make the point that he is just sacrificial lambing at this point.

Mr. Bailey (R) is not "AWOL" and I understand that he waits for the Republican Primaries February 12th just as we all wait.

Hoyer is sitting on his many millions from his rich buddies so any challenger must campaign from a weak position.

And I do not believe that "Delusional Duck" is a very credible sourse of inspiration in this election campaign.

I say the point critical to 5th District is that Hoyer needs to be voted out.

Hoyer supports the murder of babies by abortion Doctors.

Hoyer pushes excessive growth and high inflation onto our home.

Therefore I would say that Hoyer is no "fed-class candidate" either, or that Hoyer is a poor Representative for our values.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Hoyer pushes excessive growth and high inflation onto our home.

How, exactly, by what actions he takes, does Hoyer do this?

And, by what specific actions on your part would you do to correct the situation?