Elections and Junk.

[hvp05 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by somdprincess

A demon?

Her name was Gwendolyn, and she posted this. Jimmy's response was this.

She could have been somewhat more eloquent, but people do tend to get angry when Jimmy prods them personally the way he so enjoys doing. Her basic point was, "Spite is not expecting someone to contribute to their child's upbringing both financially and emotionally." To that he said, "You are like an angel / messanger showing the demon role."

He sees only what he wants to see, not what's actually there.

[Ken King (Premo)]

Originally Posted by somdprincess

That is correct and those are my scores.

Then I say you have fabricated that score and hold no credibility with me on anything you have posted or will post. Up through 2005 the 1600 point high was used on math and verbal tests and since 2006 it has been the 2400 point possibility with an addition of a writing portion, each section has a possible 800 point potential. This is easily verified so please, if you can, explain how you achieved 1800 out of a possible 1600, did you take the test through the muffler?

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by somdprincess

I see. But wouldnt it be nice if people really do try to change for the better.

I do regret if some people take my comments soooo personally, but I say my comments here are far more correct.

1) I said that the Court laws give custody to only one parent like kidnapping the children and then demanding the child support as ransom money or else the separated parent will never see their kids again.

2) I said if the custodials feel their own God given children are a burden then give the kids to the separated parent instead of stealing the child support loot.

3) The child support needs reform and I will get the process started when I get elected.

Some of my comments might be hard for some others involved but the child support steals and it impoverish parents and it puts dead broke parents into jail for being poor and slanders all the separated parents even when the parents do pay the ransom money.

So the custodials have the kids (the prize) and get paid child support for nothing and the custodials slander the separated parent and I talk back to them and thus some turn their venum onto me too, and they are wrong.

That is my point and it is only a personal shot if there is truth personal.

[hvp05 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I do regret if some people take my comments soooo personally, but I say my comments here are far more correct.

No you don't [regret it], or you wouldn't keep making such comments.

How else are people supposed to take your accusations when you say such nasty things which are clearly not factually-based? Godsbutterfly already recounted her story, I just reposted another, and I'm sure TP would love to repost his.

Everything is out there to be read... and you have been wrong every single time.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by somdprincess

I see. But wouldnt it be nice if people really do try to change for the better.

It would be. He's not.

Ask him yourself those things I brought up. Ask him if he's proud of his temper tantrum thrown against a building for being forced to pay child support. Ask him if he believes parents should remain married as long as they have a child, unless one parent is physically abusing the other. Ask him if he's suggested his son not pay "those thieves" at child support - to stand against the theivery by going to jail as a political prisoner against such defamation of parents. Ask him if there are any children - anywhere - that are going without unless it is the custodial parent's fault, and ONLY the custodial parent's fault.

If you ask him to answer me, he'll simply say I'm lying and twisting his words. Ask him these things yourself, and see what answer (if any) you get from him regarding the issues, not the messanger.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

It would be. He's not.

Ask him yourself those things I brought up. Ask him if he's proud of his temper tantrum thrown against a building for being forced to pay child support. Ask him if he believes parents should remain married as long as they have a child, unless one parent is physically abusing the other. Ask him if he's suggested his son not pay "those thieves" at child support - to stand against the theivery by going to jail as a political prisoner against such defamation of parents. Ask him if there are any children - anywhere - that are going without unless it is the custodial parent's fault, and ONLY the custodial parent's fault.

If you ask him to answer me, he'll simply say I'm lying and twisting his words. Ask him these things yourself, and see what answer (if any) you get from him regarding the issues, not the messanger.

I say that this T_p needs to just try speaking for himself.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by hvp05

Everything is out there to be read... and you have been wrong every single time.

You keep going around the point.

That your "right" and my "wrong" is being based on the present unjust system.

I am saying that I am going to change the wrongs into right when I get the power to do so.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I say that this T_p needs to just try speaking for himself.

Shortbus, I have spoken for myself. I've made my point with you over and over, and you're too thick to get it, because truth violates your inaccurate view of reality. I've tried for months to help you be an honest and better human being, and you not only refuse, you actively fight against the truth.

I'm trying to help someone else from going through that.

But, if you feel the need, I'll ask you: is there anything I quoted you as saying in that paragraph that you did not say?

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

You keep going around the point.

That your "right" and my "wrong" is being based on the present unjust system.

I am saying that I am going to change the wrongs into right when I get the power to do so.

Shortbus, you're not seeking the power to do so, you're a candidate for HoR. You've been shown that each of your signature issues is not something that the HoR has any direct bearing on. You're seeking support for later runs locally, because you think people are stupid enough to follow you later because of your words now (this, of course, is just my opinion - not something you admitted to publicly yet). You know you can't affect abortion, you know you can't affect the child support system, you know you can't affect the local infrastructure, you know you can't affect marriage laws..... so what are you talking about?

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

Shortbus, [ ]

It has been brought to my attention that some people on this Forum do mis-use this school bus for children () as one of their symbols to degrade others.

So just for the record I tell that I see nothing wrong with the short-bus and I never ever mean anything dirty or hateful when I use it, as other do.

I am not one of that group, thank God.

This is a way for that poster to mis-use and degrade children and a school bus to make his perverted point.

That poster is being a pervert concerning school children and I am not going to cooperate with his dirty claims.