Elections and Junk.

[FerretRescue]

Originally Posted by somdprincess

You think she did that out of love??

Oh no. She did that for personal gain.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

That was not a nice thing to do to that Forum.

It says "Ladies Room" so we are to stay out of there.

If anyone there wanted to read my post then they come over here.

Other people are not obsessing over me as you are and you are violating their space.

I am not posting there and never would and they are not interested in me on that thread.

You are acting like a tattle-tail baby when no one wants to hear it.

JPC you are acting like a low life scum sucking............oh wait you are a low life scum sucking peice of...................................stuff.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by Giantone

JPC you are acting like a low life scum sucking............oh wait you are a low life scum sucking peice of...................................stuff.

I actually appreciate the way you worded that - and I mean it.

God bless you.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Maybe some of it was out of love,

because I say that Hillary did it out of principle and conviction which are some of the higher aspects of love.

Originally Posted by JPC sr

The woman is the lesser vessal so that if we push them then they break.

Put pressure on and they fold.

It is not their weakness - it represents their value, link

Hillary and Monica, being the women, were clearly the lesser vessals by your wording here. Bill pressured them, and they folded. It represented their value.

Or, were you just full of pointless value?





Again.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

Hillary and Monica, being the women, were clearly the lesser vessals by your wording here. Bill pressured them, and they folded. It represented their value.

Or, were you just full of pointless value?

Again.

My words were written to you and about your children's mom, link HERE.

I did not say it about other situations.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

My words were written to you and about your children's mom, link HERE.

I did not say it about other situations.

"The woman is the lesser vessal so that if we push them then they break.

Put pressure on and they fold.

It is not their weakness - it represents their value"



You're clearly demonstrating yourself to be a liar. Again.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

"The woman is the lesser vessal so that if we push them then they break.

Put pressure on and they fold.

It is not their weakness - it represents their value"

You're clearly demonstrating yourself to be a liar. Again.

I was talking to you and about your children's mom.

And it goes to you pushing or pressuring your new replacement wife / mother too.

If you refuse to apply it as it was posted then you take it out of context.

But onward - I do say it applies to me and to other men as well (and other women too) and I will be happy to discuss that fuller, but I will not do it under some false pretense that T_p is presenting.

Being the "lesser vessal" only means that the females are not as physically large as the male.

Plus I said that it does not mean "weakness" as my own wife was far stronger than I and strength of character is more and most important in comparison to physical strength.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I was talking to you and about your children's mom.

And it goes to you pushing or pressuring your new replacement wife / mother too.

I don't have a replacement wife, nor replacement mother. I have a second wife, which is an entirely different thing.

Now, my second wife was not being discussed, so you're lying - again.

And, if you were only speaking of two people you know nothing about, why did you include that God-awful link?

If you refuse to apply it as it was posted then you take it out of context.

You're creating a context that wasn't there. You're lying, got caught - again - and now you're trying to find a way out. Sad, Jimmy, really sad.

But onward - I do say it applies to me and to other men as well (and other women too) and I will be happy to discuss that fuller, but I will not do it under some false pretense that T_p is presenting.

What's false about it, in context? Look at your link. Look at your words. I'm entirely in context. You just got shown to be the misgynistic horse's ass you really are.

Being the "lesser vessal" only means that the females are not as physically large as the male.

Plus I said that it does not mean "weakness" as my own wife was far stronger than I and strength of character is more and most important in comparison to physical strength.

I thought it "represented their value"? You really are a sad, little, little man.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

why did you include that God-awful link?

I guess that some hard headed persons might not like the link that I gave,

but I still see it as very apropriate and I agree with its content.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I guess that some hard headed persons might not like the link that I gave, but I still see it as very apropriate and I agree with its content.

5 pages of justification for considering a woman's worth only by her sexual attractiveness, then a single paragraph on how we need to stop that.

You're a twisted, misogynistic old coot, do you know that?

Besides, that doesn't answer the question. If you were only describing my ex-wife and a person who was never mentioned previously nor since (until your lame "explaination"), why the need for the link? Why did you call these two people them, they, etc., instead of who you were talking about? How did it fit into the conversation? How did it "represent their value?"


It didn't. That's not what you were saying. You're covering your tracks.

Sad, Jimmy. Sad.