Elections and Junk.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

Now, you said that this concept applies to all women. Then, why didn't it apply to Monica? Why wasn't she the weaker one, pushed by Bill. If she was the lesser vessal, broken when pushed, wouldn't that follow that Bill was the one in charge? That he was the one doing wrong?

Lesser vessal does not mean weaker person - and I said that from the very beginning.

It goes back to the fact that your are just being a fraud and you need to stop it.

[somdprincess]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

You are welcome to your own opinion,

but I have backed up everything I said,

and using links is how the Internet functions and I wish others would use links to back up their questionable claims.

And according to your previous post you did not even check out the link your post shown HERE so if you are intimidated by links then it is your own loss.

If you need some assurances then the Forum does not allow obscene or inappropriate links just as it does not allow that language.

Others do try to cheat the rules but I never do.

based on your links from the past and now I just visited the other one you mentioned in here. None of them are trustworthy sites or sources of information.

Hey I am all for being open minded. I have not been rude or disrespectful to you in anyway. However, some of your ideas seem good until you lose it with the weak background.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Lesser vessal does not mean weaker person - and I said that from the very beginning.

I know you said that, but I'm not talking JUST about lesser vessal. How about folding when pushed? Bill pushed Monica, and she folded (straight over, if the reports are right ). Bill pushed Hillary and she folded. "It goes to their value"

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by somdprincess

based on your links from the past and now I just visited the other one you mentioned in here. None of them are trustworthy sites or sources of information.

Oh, I thought you meant that the link might have a virus that could harm your computer or some thing nasty content on the link.

Thank you for now here telling me it more correctly.

So who would you say is trustworthy?

In my opinion and beliefs then I judge for myself if the info is acceptable or not so I do not put any trust in any thing outside of my own decisions.

Like we are to trust the US President but that trust is long gone and betrayed.

When I went to Court I trusted the law and when it was over I did not trust that any more.

So now if I hear a true statement from a weak source then I accept the truth without accepting the source.

Like if a dunk bum said that "God is great" - then I would say - "amen brother."

Originally Posted by somdprincess

Hey I am all for being open minded. I have not been rude or disrespectful to you in anyway.

That is true and you have always been very nice on here to me.

I hope you never see my posts as disrespectful to you but if you do then tell me and I will address it for sure.

Some posts to others might seem disrespectful but we must communicate and so I say we all must take a little and I take much myself even though it is not equivolent for me as I have unusually healthy boundaries.

Originally Posted by somdprincess

However, some of your ideas seem good until you lose it with the weak background.

My personal back ground might appear weak to some and maybe they are right,

but watch out for the future because I am coming.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

I know you said that, but I'm not talking JUST about lesser vessal. How about folding when pushed? Bill pushed Monica, and she folded (straight over, if the reports are right ). Bill pushed Hillary and she folded. "It goes to their value"

Your dirty interpretations and your dirty mind does not apply to anything that I say.

[somdprincess]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Oh, I thought you meant that the link might have a virus that could harm your computer or some thing nasty content on the link.

Thank you for now here telling me it more correctly.

So who would you say is trustworthy?

In my opinion and beliefs then I judge for myself if the info is acceptable or not so I do not put any trust in any thing outside of my own decisions.

Like we are to trust the US President but that trust is long gone and betrayed.

When I went to Court I trusted the law and when it was over I did not trust that any more.

So now if I hear a true statement from a weak source then I accept the truth without accepting the source.

Like if a dunk bum said that "God is great" - then I would say - "amen brother."
That is true and you have always been very nice on here to me.

I hope you never see my posts as disrespectful to you but if you do then tell me and I will address it for sure.

Some posts to others might seem disrespectful but we must communicate and so I say we all must take a little and I take much myself even though it is not equivolent for me as I have unusually healthy boundaries. My personal back ground might appear weak to some and maybe they are right,

but watch out for the future because I am coming.

not your background sorry, wrong word. I meant when it comes to those links or the foundation of how you are going to do something it falls short.

The websites are more self promotion of the ones who wrote them.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Your dirty interpretations and your dirty mind does not apply to anything that I say.

If you can't stand by the logical conclusions of your own posts, and recognize how they directly conflict with your other posts, that's your problem, not mine.

I said nothing dirty. How YOUR mind took it is also your problem, not mine.

If you can't support your own claims, please stop making stupid ones.

TIA.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by somdprincess

not your background sorry, wrong word. I meant when it comes to those links or the foundation of how you are going to do something it falls short.

The websites are more self promotion of the ones who wrote them.

I have been doing Internet Forums for a long time and I find it is necessary to make oneself as very clear as possible or others will misunderstand and that is why many of my post might seem elaborate - IMO.

The fact is that a US Congress person (male or female) has limits to their actual authority while having many options for inhancing that authority and very much of my intention after being elected is from the negation of the destructive and improper policies of our incumbant Representative Hoyer (D).

Particularly my position of being pro-life would be a big improvement over the pro abortion positions of Hoyer and we need this improvement here in 5th District but it is highly unlikely that I could get any real pro-life legislation through the Congress in my two year term.

I would try and I would find other pro-life Reps and team up but I can give no promises of success.

But we still need to have our home 5th District to have a Representative that reflects our moral values and that is not Hoyer.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr to SOMD Princess

So who would you say is trustworthy?

Originally Posted by somdprincess to me

You should have ran against JPC.

Originally Posted by somdprincess to me

Well, he can speak for me. So far everything TP has posted was backed up and argued with reason.

I'm not trying to speak for Princess, but the reasoning speaks for itself. Seriously, though, look at the wording - "argued with reason", "everything ... posted was backed up".... YOU should try those things some time.

However, should I say something, that doesn't make it fact. As I've told you repeatedly, Wiki is not a source, and neither are the loon sites you go to. Try valid, unbiased sites, and see what you get from there.



Princess, I hope you don't mind my quoting you.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I would try and I would find other pro-life Reps and team up but I can give no promises of success.

Team up and do what?

I can assure you you would be unsuccessful in whatever you attempt in that arena. You're running for the wrong office if you want to affect abortion laws.

But, you already know that. It's not important enough to you to run where you could be useful in that arena, so you run now, for an office you admit has no voice on the issue.