Elections and Junk.

[hvp05 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

It appears to me that "hvp" just does not quite know what respect is.

My definition begins with the old directive, "Do unto others...," then I figure in a person's actions, words, and if the two are honest, factual, and congruent. This allows me to respect those with whom I do not actually agree.

You, obviously, harbor another definition. What would that be?

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Telling a poster... none of this is being disrespectful.

Perhaps, but you never proved the existence of slander, profanity, or theft (via CS). That's your problem, not mine.

Originally Posted by JPC sr

See that is setting up the question inappropriately.

So you do not believe you should respect fathers and mothers who actually work to provide for their children. Interesting, Mr. Candidate.

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Mr. Psychiatrist "hvp" is one of those nasty normal people.

Now that I will agree to!

[MMDad]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I do not have any "mental health records" to release.

I do not have a mental illness and I do not take any medications for mental illness either.

So I have no record to release.

When you were in prison, the judge ordered you to receive Psychological and Psychiatric treatment. Are you saying there are no records of that?

By the way, just because you don't take your meds doesn't mean you don't need them.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by smcop

Will you talk at all about your criminal record? Will you talk about your loving family life? Will you discuss any criminal records of your children?

Since my Biography (abridged) is given on my campaign website ( BioPage ) and that website is also listed in the State elections registry link then I have already told the hard truths for anyone to see.

I will try not to discuss my son at all, as I do not speak for him, and that info is irrelevant.

And the Washington Post has pre-selected questions that will be asked of Hoyer and asked to the Republican challengers and I get the same.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by hvp05

My definition begins with the old directive, "Do unto others...," then I figure in a person's actions, words, and if the two are honest, factual, and congruent. This allows me to respect those with whom I do not actually agree.

You, obviously, harbor another definition. What would that be?

I like that "do unto others ... " but my point was in that I will respectfully disagree with others when that is called for.

Originally Posted by hvp05

So you do not believe you should respect fathers and mothers who actually work to provide for their children. Interesting, Mr. Candidate.

Well I certainly never said any crud like that,

and if you want to be respected then you need to rise out of the gutter.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by MMDad

When you were in prison, the judge ordered you to receive Psychological and Psychiatric treatment. Are you saying there are no records of that?

The gov records are not my records and I have no say over those records.

But the fact remains that I do not have and never had a mental illness so there is no record of that.

In due course I told the Judge in much detail that my actions were in open defiance and subversion and not done out of any confusion or otherwise and I believe he got that point.

And my forced evaluations and forced testings by the Courts showed that I was sane and competant.

Originally Posted by MMDad

By the way, just because you don't take your meds doesn't mean you don't need them.

That is very true, and some times I take meds for my injuries and various pains and injuries but I do usually stop long before the perscriptions are finished.

I do believe that most if not all meds are overly perscribed.

[hvp05 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Since my Biography (abridged) is given on my campaign website

But previously you told us we could not trust your "abridged" history...

Originally Posted by JPC sr

It is because I have to tell things in short post while the story covers some 15 years of child support.

Of course I could try to write a year by year autobiography but I say not. (Post.)

So we can not trust the short version, and you do not wish to tell us the entire story. I guess we should be skeptical of any of your "recollections". Correct?

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Well I certainly never said any crud like that

This was just a couple hours ago! I said, "I would think, if you were truly working to 'make amends' for being a crappy father yourself, that you would respect and support fathers and mothers who do unlike yourself and actually support their child[ren]."

To that you said, "See that is setting up the question inappropriately," and apparently completely disagreed. Thus, I am left to conclude that you do not respect parents who care for their children, while you do respect those who treat their children like any disposable item and leave without a second thought.

Originally Posted by JPC sr

In due course I told the Judge in much detail that my actions were in open defiance and subversion...

I'm not sure which is more scary: that you are a sociopath, which would at least provide a reason for your vile behavior and beliefs; or, that you are totally sane and are simply a calculating charlatan.

Originally Posted by JPC sr

And my forced evaluations and forced testings by the Courts showed that I was sane and competant.

Every other time you have been to court, I would say it has been your fault... but this time I think you would be justified in suing the state for giving you a clearly incorrect evaluation. Regardless, whatever the findings were, they should be on record somewhere. Your refusal to release these records as vindication should alert any mindful voter.

[godsbutterfly]

Originally Posted by JPC sr
I like that "do unto others ... " but my point was in that I will respectfully disagree with others when that is called for. "

Really? Then how do you explain the accusations against me in this next post?
Originally Posted by JPC sr
"You having the 3 "wonderful children" means you have the prize, you have the man's children, and you hold them captive like kidnapped prisoners so the dad must pay you child support cash or else he never sees his wonderful children again.

You are a kid-napper demanding ransom money and the unjust laws empower that wrong doing."

That's slander JPC and you never had a right to say it nor have you ever apologized for it. Where is the RESPECT in that post for me? Nowhere.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by hvp05

But previously you told us we could not trust your "abridged" history...So we can not trust the short version, and you do not wish to tell us the entire story.

I have NEVER EVER told anyone not to trust any writings of mine.

You keep making those false accusations and then wonder why people do not respect you.

I stand by everything that I wrote as being true and correct to the best of my abilities.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I like that "do unto others ... " but my point was in that I will respectfully disagree with others when that is called for. "

Originally Posted by godsbutterfly

Really? Then how do you explain the accusations against me in this next post?

Originally Posted by JPC sr

"You having the 3 "wonderful children" means you have the prize, you have the man's children, and you hold them captive like kidnapped prisoners so the dad must pay you child support cash or else he never sees his wonderful children again.

You are a kid-napper demanding ransom money and the unjust laws empower that wrong doing."

Originally Posted by godsbutterfly

That's slander JPC and you never had a right to say it nor have you ever apologized for it. Where is the RESPECT in that post for me? Nowhere.

I believe that I did correct that by saying that it is the custody and child support laws that do the kidnapping and it is the unjust law that demands the ranson money and it is not really you or any custodial that actually does it but the custodial is standing behind that injustice done to the separated parents.

You might take that as personally offencive but there it is and that is how it is and I am putting it as respectful as this can be in honesty.

The law does the dirty deeds in the custodial's name.

[godsbutterfly]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I believe that I did correct that by saying that it is the custody and child support laws that do the kidnapping and it is the unjust law that demands the ranson money and it is not really you or any custodial that actually does it but the custodial is standing behind that injustice done to the separated parents.

You might take that as personally offencive but there it is and that is how it is and I am putting it as respectful as this can be in honesty.

The law does the dirty deeds in the custodial's name.

You didn't "correct" it - you tried to justify it. You failed miserably. You passed judgement on me unfairly and yes, I took it personally and still do. What was I thinking to expect you to do the right thing and apologize? I bet you have trouble sitting down with your backside on your shoulders like that.