National Rifle Association.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Of course it was a joke,

but the joke just has a lot of truth in it and it carries a true message - and that is funny.

Most of my postings on this Board are done in humor and dis-involved.

I find this whole Forum to be fun and entertaining and I always try to do my part to keep it that way.

It is not healthy to take such things too seriously.

Sort of like your candidacy? I see.....

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by This_person

Sort of like your candidacy? I see.....

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

National Rifle Association of America.

2008 U.S. House Candidate Questionnaire [Abridged]

Policy of No-Net-Loss of public hunting acreage for federal lands used for hunting? = I am undecided.

Sportsman must not be denied access to the federal lands for hunting, fishing or trapping. = I am undecided.
=====================

Those last two questions seem to be saying that the Second Amemdment guarentees the right to hunt and I am leaning to disagree.

The Second Amendment is the right to use firearms against people and not to hunt animals.

If the federal lands stop hunting then the NRA can not claim some Second Amendment right to hunt on "other" federal lands.

Like we are NOT going to let them hunt in Yellowstone or other National Parks.

[AndyMarquisLIVE (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Those last two questions seem to be saying that the Second Amemdment guarentees the right to hunt and I am leaning to disagree.

The Second Amendment is the right to use firearms against people and not to hunt animals.

If the federal lands stop hunting then the NRA can not claim some Second Amendment right to hunt on "other" federal lands.

Like we are NOT going to let them hunt in Yellowstone or other National Parks.

I won't take your campaign seriously because you won't even give me a live interview. It makes me think your whole campaign is a joke.

I bet Steny Hoyer will give me a live interview.

[ImnoMensa]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Those last two questions seem to be saying that the Second Amemdment guarentees the right to hunt and I am leaning to disagree.

The Second Amendment is the right to use firearms against people and not to hunt animals.

If the federal lands stop hunting then the NRA can not claim some Second Amendment right to hunt on "other" federal lands.

Like we are NOT going to let them hunt in Yellowstone or other National Parks.

So you are in favor of using firearms against people but not hunting animals.
Makes sense I guess-------------To you.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by AndyMarquisLIVE

I won't take your campaign seriously because you won't even give me a live interview. It makes me think your whole campaign is a joke.

I bet Steny Hoyer will give me a live interview.

I see your avatar as a reflection of what a nasty little man that you have become.

If one wants respected then they must start acting respectable.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by ImnoMensa

So you are in favor of using firearms against people but not hunting animals.
Makes sense I guess-------------To you.

Well some people do seem to ask for the violence they receive while animals are innocent.

And my point remains that the Second Amendment is for weapons to defend the population from the abuses of the US gov and not a right to hunt animals.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Well some people do seem to ask for the violence they receive while animals are innocent.

And my point remains that the Second Amendment is for weapons to defend the population from the abuses of the US gov and not a right to hunt animals.

[AndyMarquisLIVE (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I see your avatar as a reflection of what a nasty little man that you have become.

If one wants respected then they must start acting respectable.

JPC says I'm a "nasty little man."

That's frickin' hilarious!

My avatar has a point behind it. ESPN SUCKS. I missed several IndyCar Series races because of the thieving bastards moving stuff around at the last little second. I missed the end of a fantastic race at Bristol because of "human error." I missed the race winning lead change at Talladega because ESPN was more interested in showing us the race for 23rd position. The communists didn't interview a first time winner at Memphis because getting on the air 5 minutes before a coin toss in a football game was more important. Suzy Kolber did years of damage to my ears with her irritating voice.

Need more?

[residentofcre (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Well some people do seem to ask for the violence they receive while animals are innocent.

And my point remains that the Second Amendment is for weapons to defend the population from the abuses of the US gov and not a right to hunt animals.

Ok... I totally don't get where you are coming from on this one...

The right to bare arms was included in the Constitution so that people like King George could not overtake them again. It has nothing to do with Bambi....

Let's talk about what you would do to fight the crime in the streets of our cities? I think the family sitting in their living rooms tapping on the keyboards in forums like these need a little more attention that the animal rights activitists... JPC... you need to talk about issues that are relavent.... now is the time... you should have this rhetoric down pat by now.... I'm trying to get you to use it....