National Rifle Association.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Some people consider distruction of property that is not yours and act of violence.

I guess I have to agree,

so yes,

destruction of property is a violent act, and it promotes violence too.

When I spray painted the State Buildings then I certainly did those with malice and contempt.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I guess I have to agree, so yes, destruction of property is a violent act, and it promotes violence too.

When I spray painted the State Buildings then I certainly did those with malice and contempt.

So you fully support your jail time for your violent act, and the violence it promoted, when throwing your infantile temper tantrum?

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

So you fully support your jail time for your violent act, and the violence it promoted, when throwing your infantile temper tantrum?

Yes, of course.

When I spray painted the Circuit Court and the Child Support Office then I stayed right there and told them that I did it and handed the cop the paint can at each of those events.

Then at the State House I stayed but got tired of waiting and a month later when they figured it out that it was me - then I insisted on the jury trial and after convicted then I told the Judge what I thought of the thieving child support - and then I got the maximum jail sentence of three (3) years in MD prison for the misdemeanor of Destruction of Property and I still consider my jail time as a political act of subversion and I did all my three years completely without even one day off for "good time" because I was not "good" (under the laws deffinition) while I was under their control.

In non-violent civil disobediance the jail time is part of the action.

I did consider it as a non violent action at that time but later I came to see it as consisting of both my malice and my contempt so I accept that mine were violent and that some acts of violence are justified.

Like the mouse that scratches the cat's nose or a woman fighting a rapist, then a normally non violent can be compelled to use violence.

So like the Second Amendment - I say that any parent attacked by the child support does have an ethical right to fight back with violence against their gov oppressors.

[bcp (Premo)]

Originally Posted by aps45819

He believes he'll have free beer after he wins the election.

I believe he's an idiot

hold to the horse,
You get free beer if you get elected to a public office?

well no doo-doo (wouldnt let me put the real word in)


Im BCP and I am going to register as a Republican candidate for the U.S. House of
Representatives, for Maryland Congressional 5th District.


my campaign slogan
A 12 pack in every fridge and a big boobed babe in every bedroom.




can I get me some beer now?

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I guess I have to agree,

so yes,

destruction of property is a violent act, and it promotes violence too.

When I spray painted the State Buildings then I certainly did those with malice and contempt.

duhhhh

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

When I spray painted the Circuit Court and the Child Support Office then I stayed right there and told them that I did it and handed the cop the paint can at each of those events. Then at the State House I stayed but got tired of waiting and a month later when they figured it out that it was me - then I insisted on the jury trial and after convicted then I told the Judge what I thought of the thieving child support - and then I got the maximum jail sentence of three (3) years in MD prison for the misdemeanor of Destruction of Property and I still consider my jail time as a political act of subversion and I did all my three years completely without even one day off for "good time" because I was not "good" (under the laws deffinition) while I was under their control. In non-violent civil disobediance the jail time is part of the action.

I've always wondered about this. You were, biologically speaking at least, a young boy's father. You actively chose to go to jail over being out of jail and available for your son - that's the only logical assumption since you (a) actively chose to break the law; (b)waited for the police several times to catch you breaking the law; (c) chose to disrespectfully mouth off to the judge to ensure full jail time; and (d) chose to act improperly in jail to ensure you wouldn't get out early for good behavior.

As a father, what made you choose to be separated from your son?

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

I've always wondered about this. You were, biologically speaking at least, a young boy's father. You actively chose to go to jail over being out of jail and available for your son - that's the only logical assumption since you (a) actively chose to break the law; (b)waited for the police several times to catch you breaking the law; (c) chose to disrespectfully mouth off to the judge to ensure full jail time; and (d) chose to act improperly in jail to ensure you wouldn't get out early for good behavior.

As a father, what made you choose to be separated from your son?

It was the unjust child support laws that pushed me into crime.

It was totally unacceptable to submit to a thieving unjust gov under their untrue claims of supporting my son, so the only honest option I saw was to defy the dirty thieves and so that is what I did.

For me, I found it dishonest and thereby unacceptable for me to just defy the child support and not the thieves, so I decided to spray paint the buildings of the child support thieves as my act of open honest rebellion, and then go to jail for my political act of subversion.

Being separated from my son was the result of my marriage separation and legal divorce and that is the way our system is designed to divide the family unit and disolve the marriage and it happened to me as it does to many millions of other parents accross the USA.

I regretted being separated from my son and I still regret that to this day.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

It was the unjust child support laws that pushed me into crime.

It was totally unacceptable to submit to a thieving unjust gov under their untrue claims of supporting my son, so the only honest option I saw was to defy the dirty thieves and so that is what I did.

For me, I found it dishonest and thereby unacceptable for me to just defy the child support and not the thieves, so I decided to spray paint the buildings of the child support thieves as my act of open honest rebellion, and then go to jail for my political act of subversion.

Being separated from my son was the result of my marriage separation and legal divorce and that is the way our system is designed to divide the family unit and disolve the marriage and it happened to me as it does to many millions of other parents accross the USA.

I regretted being separated from my son and I still regret that to this day.

Did you understand at the time that you could still see your son, go to his school functions, buy him birthday presents, help him with his homework, be there to answer his questions and know what was going on in his life, etc., etc., if you were out of prison, but chose to give those options up anyway? Or, did you not understand what you were giving up?

Did you also understand at the time that you could fight child support later (as you are now), and still be there for your son then? Or, did you really just not understand that you had options other than what you chose to do?

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

Did you understand at the time that you could still see your son, go to his school functions, buy him birthday presents, help him with his homework, be there to answer his questions and know what was going on in his life, etc., etc., if you were out of prison, but chose to give those options up anyway? Or, did you not understand what you were giving up?

Did you also understand at the time that you could fight child support later (as you are now), and still be there for your son then? Or, did you really just not understand that you had options other than what you chose to do?

I did what I thought was right and proper at those times.

Some of my past was a mistake and my own scew ups but I am not going to debate my own regets with you.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I did what I thought was right and proper at those times.

Some of my past was a mistake and my own scew ups but I am not going to debate my own regets with you.

I don't want to debate them (let's face it, there is NO debate). I'm trying to understand you. You knew the results of your actions before you took them, but took them anyway. That's a key to your character. As a candidate for HoR, your character is a factor. What other actions would you take with little or no thought - or with thought and disregard of the horrific consequences?

Why did you think choosing to not be around your son was right at the time? Why was fighting against a system designed to protect your son worth not being there for your son?