National Rifle Association.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I believe the Second Amendment was meant for the citizens to have the right and the ABILITY to defend themselves if the Federal gov becomes abusive.

It was not meant for hunting wildlife but for protection against gov tyranny.

The USA founding parents (male and females) had to take up arms to fight and even war against the injustices of the ruling British authority and therefore the Second Amendment was put there to insure that same right to the future generations.

I do not want to have a weapon myself and I am personally non violent and I use to have guns and I got rid of them all, but I maintain that I understand the purpose and the NEED for the common individual citizen to have their right to own and bare arms which must be maintained.

I totally support the Second Amendment as an individual right so that individuals may form as a militia if the need arises.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Good to know you agree with yourself!

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by This_person

Good to know you agree with yourself!

......and that is still one person to many.

[Lenny]

Originally Posted by Giantone

......and that is still one person to many.

Self-abuse is what's leading to the softening of the brain in this idgit. It really pizzes him off to use the term cerebromalacia. Too many syllables for him to sound out, too long to spraypaint on side of a building before the can runs dry, too tough a concept for his shriveled little brain to get around.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by This_person

Right, that's where you said it, now please explain it. In what way?

????

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

????

I spelled it out in detail in the first place,

so if you do not understand it then there is nothing I can do for you.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I spelled it out in detail in the first place, so if you do not understand it then there is nothing I can do for you.

This is what you "spelled out in detail":

Originally Posted by JPC sr

The separated parents can indeed do as T_p discribes above but it means the separated parent must accept being physically and legally degraded into a second class status like second class parent or as the inferior position or inferior parent that must kiss up to the custodial or never see their own children again.

Please explain how a separated parent is degraded legally and physically as a second class citizen and/or parent.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

I spelled it out in detail in the first place,

so if you do not understand it then there is nothing I can do for you.

Then reprint the post!