Political - Junk.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Well I learned a big part of the police style while I was in jail and in prison, and the authorities would send in under-cover agents to spy and to find out info from the inmates. The type of questions they ask and the obvious leadings are present in that type of email.

The emails come from other Countries because the US Homeland Security is a Federal agency and our laws will not allow them to intrap American citizens in internal stings, but having an international sourse makes it into a federal priority type crime.

Plus they ask for unneccessary information like address, age, marital staus and particularly they ask Nationality because they are particularly after foreigners and foreign sympathies here in the USA.

And these kind of "junk-mail" gets through the Yahoo and AOL sensors and Spam-Guards and that is nearly imposible to do, and imposible to do repeatedly, because the search engine email providers are powerful elements of the Internet.

Also these kinds of emails will often do stuff like give sign that they are listed in the address / contacts when they are not. And some will even go into the Spam box after deleting from the inbox and only a the gov would have the authority to violate the search engine's (Google, Yahoo, AOL) spam guards.

So it has many tell-tale signs pointing directly to the gov Homeland Security searching for terrorist links in the USA.

There is also the report that all the 9-11 high-jackers used emails to communicate and so the internal search for enemies is on.

More foolish gov junk :

fondizion di vitorio España S.A.
28042 Madrid, Spain
(Admitted 1986)

The fondizion di vitorio España has awarded your email a cash grant of
five hundred thousand US Dollars in a random email world
progamme,attached to qualification number LV345ES.The objectives is to
make a notable changes in the standard of living world wide.To claim
your award email
your full names,telephon number,mobile,occupation and contact address
to the agent below.

fondizion di vitorio España S.A.
Officer in charge:Dr. Charles melvis
Email:fondizion @aim.com

congratulations in advance!!!
Mrs. Finela Transofa

This Junk is just soooooo lame.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Vote Democrat James P. Cusick Sr. For Pro-Life
Email: JPCusickSr @Yahoo.com, P.O. Box 1252 Lexington Park, MD 20653
Campaign Website: www. VoteCusick.BraveHost.com
Maryland 5th District, to replace Steny Hoyer in the House of Representatives.
Pro-Life vs. Abortion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This ad provided and paid for by the candidate James P. Cusick Sr. (D)

Big News, the Enterprise (and the 3 tri-County papers) have my campaign advertisement (shown in above quote) at top dead center on the inside of the last page of section A.

So the voters here can see it - Cusick vs. Hoyer means Pro-Life vs. Abortion.

Morality me verses immorality Hoyer, voting February 12, 2008.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Big News, the Enterprise (and the 3 tri-County papers) have my campaign advertisement (shown in above quote) at top dead center on the inside of the last page of section A.

So the voters here can see it - Cusick vs. Hoyer means Pro-Life vs. Abortion.

Morality me verses immorality Hoyer, voting February 12, 2008.

Why did the paper suggest your only followers will not allow themselves to be aligned with you publicly?

Why won't your son allow himself to be aligned with you publicly?

I believe I know the answers to these questions, do you?

[Go G-Men]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

If I were really "paranoid" about it then I would not post it in a public Internet Forum like done here.

It is just a piece of trivia that I believe people need to know.

You do this to draw attention to yourself.. That is the total of it.. Typical narcissistic behavior.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

Why did the paper suggest your only followers will not allow themselves to be aligned with you publicly?

She asked me to have some supporter speak to her and I said that people do not want their names or their words put into the paper.

People are afraid of public exposure and I respect that, plus I want to lead the charge (as Alexander did) because I have the power and others do not.

I do not want nor ask others to speak for me - just vote and I will do the rest.

That reporter asked for some thing that I do not want to give, and I am in charge.

Originally Posted by This_person

Why won't your son allow himself to be aligned with you publicly?

I do not know if he would or not as I do not ask.

The fact was and still is that I do not want him involved as this is my campaign and it is my fight.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

She asked me to have some supporter speak to her and I said that people do not want their names or their words put into the paper.

Interesting. Your (probably imaginary) "supporters" don't know what speaking anonomously is?

People are afraid of public exposure and I respect that,

I can see that. I know if I supported you, I'd be afraid to expose that publicly also

plus I want to lead the charge (as Alexander did) because I have the power and others do not.

For you to "lead", someone would have to be following. Otherwise, you're just wandering lost away from the group.

I do not know if he would or not as I do not ask. The fact was and still is that I do not want him involved as this is my campaign and it is my fight.

But, the report wasn't that you refused to let him be involved, it was that he refused to be contacted. You really don't have any power over who the reporter talks to, regardless of what you think. So, it sounds like it was HIS choice to not be associated with you publicly, not yours (just a little reality, sorry!).

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by This_person

Interesting. Your (probably imaginary) "supporters" don't know what speaking anonomously is?I can see that. I know if I supported you, I'd be afraid to expose that publicly alsoFor you to "lead", someone would have to be following. Otherwise, you're just wandering lost away from the group.But, the report wasn't that you refused to let him be involved, it was that he refused to be contacted. You really don't have any power over who the reporter talks to, regardless of what you think. So, it sounds like it was HIS choice to not be associated with you publicly, not yours (just a little reality, sorry!).

So welcome to the Political - Junk thread.

[Giantone]

...............any thread with JPC is junk.

[Harvick29]

People are afraid of public exposure and I respect that, plus I want to lead the charge (as Alexander did) because I have the power and others do not.


Alexander the Great ?? You compare yourself to him while you have a picture of Ghandi by your name ?

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by Harvick29

Alexander the Great ?? You compare yourself to him while you have a picture of Ghandi by your name ?

Well like - obviously - yes I do.

Gandhi led his troops too.

I do not like all that Alexander did, but I particularly like that one tactic he used to defeat Darius of Persia.

A fine point - even needle point, straight to the heart of the opponent.